Search results

Those texts are between Bergamo and AIA's secretary. They are discussing their fear of Juve winning because no one can catch them and if only Inter could beat them, then maybe Milan could close the distance but Inter were "dead". Bergamo tells this Fazi twat that he already called the referee...

That is amazing. It sounds like there was a system after all...against us.

I think today they are discussing the 2006 title and not Moggi’s ban. In any case I don’t see Moggi being reinstated. It would leave everyone too open to liability suits. The title will likely be revoked from Inter eventually. When and from which court I don’t know.

We likely won't hear anything before Monday. Today they present their arguments and that should be it.

All they had to do was ask for proof though. They just accepted a punishment willingly without a fair trial. That was irresponsible and being clueless in that regard isn’t much of an excuse. These are professionals (not Gigli and Blanc but the Agnelli’s, Elkunts, Montemerda, Zaccone, Franzo...

Moggi resigned from Juventus...not from football. As stated earlier, the theory isn't that they had one objective (that of ousting Moggi/Giraudo. The theory is that they had two objectives, ousting the triad to gain financial control, and ensuring that Moggi and Giraudo never went to work...

Finally, people who fail to see the Elkanns as businessmen and instead view them as fans like us find it impossible that they were involved from the beginning. I'm the first to say that I do not know for sure but I can formulate an opinion based on what I see and so far no one (them included)...

This might be the 7th time I write this. EXOR SAW NO JUVE MONEY BEFORE THE SCANDAL! They saw dividends for being shareholders but those are pocket change compared to the cash flow and net income Juve could provide.

Maybe but the latter wouldn't shock me in the least and in the meantime I hate them already for not doing right by the team at the onset of the scandal.

You missed the point. Profitable as they were the Elkanns saw none of it. Now they have new sponsorship deals, a stadium to their name and 100% financial control. Moratti was on the brink of losing his team. Their ultras were beating up the players in airports and demanding Moratti sell the...

I don't know, maybe because Telecom was willing to sponsor Ferrari and Juventus and Mediaset wasn't.

Being hard to believe is one thing. I too won’t commit to one side or the other. It is possible and the motive for financial gain is definitely present but unless someone comes out and admits it, proof is damn near impossible which is why it is a theory. Sticking to what we know is enough...

Moggi resigned because he wanted to distance himself from Juventus’ legal team. He wanted to fight, they didn’t. He couldn’t afford to have Zaccone defending him when Zaccone was being told to rollover by the Elkunts. He also understood that at the next general meeting he would be fired...

Nothing new. This journalist is wondering if the FIGC's position will remain so tranquil when UEFA finds out that Palazzi's declaration shows Inter's role in the 2004-2005 season and that they were never punished for it in the sports tribunal of 2006.

Wrong thread no? Long story short, they remind me of Lippi's clan in the 90s. There is plenty of room for improvement but the foundation is a solid one for the first time in years. If they can stay healthy a top 3 finish isn't out of the question especially considering they don’t have any...

Doesn't read that way exactly. They cleverly left room for differences and debate. Juve's lawyers wrote that the title was revoked from Juve and handed to Inter who had committed "acts of the same genre in the same season.” That translation is literal but what they are saying is that they...

It's not fake. In fact, in a recent meeting in Cyprus Abete was informed that he was going to receive correspondence from UEFA on the matter of Calciopoli. What will happen is anyone’s guess. Don’t jizz yourselves just yet. It could have been a means to keep all parties content without any...

I wrote as John

Go to the article now...there are some comments at the bottom. Order got screwed up. The second last and last comments are actually the 1st and 2nd. All else is in order.

That might be because you don't stand to make or lose money over it. They would likely let the leagues deal with it domestically and if they chose to do nothing (like the FIGC) then it would be the domestic league that would look bad and UEFA powerless to take action. It's like the hot potato...