You could argue that my position on VAR is ignorant in that I almost follow the logic of "if it's only correct 98% of the time and not 100%, throw it out!" But VAR is still a seductive and deceptive false reality. We are replacing a human point of reference with multiple, sometimes conflicting, perspectives aided with slow-motion cameras and then fed to humans for judgement. And with technology, I feel there's a major cognitive gap with fans thinking that VAR eliminates all controversy and human decision-making when, in fact, it couldn't be further from the truth. It's just the level of detail at which we argue calls now
The romantic in me prefers we prioritize the viewpoint of those in the stadium at the match, on the pitch, in real time, and that the match isn't played for remote robots, cameras, and casual fans watching on TV. But what we're saying with VAR is that cameras don't lie. But the truth is they do, and I am not just talking about deep fakes and conspiracies like that.
Hence VAR to me is just a Sisyphean effort to produce "Truth Theater"... a false comfort in a belief that we're closer to the truth and devoid of controversy when that is always an element of a human game being performed and judged by fallible humans.