Wishlist and General Juve mercato talk (2013-14) (34 Viewers)

[Ahmed]

Bradley

I would expect Dusie to say something like that, not anyone else.

 

Buy on AliExpress.com

[Dostoevsky]

Suarez is probably the only one i would rate as being close to their level. Jovetic may one day get there if he can manage to get past injury issues. when i say he is overrated i mean it in terms of if he was playing here we would all get to see some of his inconsistencies and weaknesses.

I like Jovetic alot though and feel like he can grow immensely. if veratti is not available then pretty much every single penny we have should be towards getting Jovetic here since the team is well stacked everywhere else

Well, fair enough.

I personally think he'd fin it great here and IMO he's capable of becoming one of the clubs biggest players. Injuries are indeed annoying, though.

Suarez would be brilliant, no doubt about that.

 

[ALC]

Oh well.

Were you the Brek Shea fapper? Exciting move for him

I think that was all us fellow mericans. And yeah, agreed. Hopefully he becomes more consistent there.

 

[Dostoevsky]

Bradley

I would expect Dusie to say something like that, not anyone else.

Why? He was good at Chievo and so far he's doing well. He's all-round player and very good at it.

I don't rate high many of Roma players, but he is one of them.

 

[Gep]

Right!........Jovetic or Suarez everyone?

 

[Quetzalcoatl]

Suarez is better now, but I prefer Jovetic. Either would be sexbomb.

 

[Badass J Elkann]

i would choke myself to death if im gonna see suarez in a juve jersey...he might be a good player, but hes a b1tch...ogbonna, poli and icardi sounds damn nice though

to choose icardi over suarez is just retarded, i don't care how much of a cunt suarez is, at the end of the day his quality speaks louder than Icardi;s

 

[Red]

What would you guys say about a Llorente - Muriel duo next season?

Not convinced by Muriel.

Interesting player and has potential, but would be looking for more of a sure thing that that.

Also far from convinced he has what it takes to do anything in a team that doesn't just play on the counter-attack.

 

[Zé Tahir]

Not convinced by Muriel.

Interesting player and has potential, but would be looking for more of a sure thing that that.

Also far from convinced he has what it takes to do anything in a team that doesn't just play on the counter-attack.

I smell an Amauri.

 

[Bjerknes]

I would 100% want Bradley here over Nainggolan. Two reasons:

1) Nainggolan is a prick and badmouthed us.
2) I rate Bradley more anyways.

We have a massive fan base in Indonesia; Naingodude would be a better marketing move (not that we sign players based on that anyway).

The only thing good to have come out of Indonesia is Sepak Takraw.

Come on, consumer spendings aren't well and unemployment rate is becoming higher. If you're in to marketing $, I would say sign a Chinese/Asian player rather than an American one.

and Bradley is cack. He suits a side like Roma.

He's a good water carrier, just like Marchisio.

Bradley would be a good tactical option for matches when we see less of the ball or are worried about the counter. He never stops running and knows his limitations as a player, so he doesn't give the ball away much. Moreover, I think he's up there in terms of ground covered in serie A.

If we had an opportunity to sign him it would be a no brainer. But knowing Marotta, he'd probably rather go with Migliaccio.

 

[Bianconero_Aus]

Migliaccio

 

[IrishZebra]

Stephen Irelands Gay(er) brother?

 

[Bianconero81]

The only thing good to have come out of Indonesia is Sepak Takraw.

Sepak Takraw was first played in Malaysia and Thailand. It's derived from an older form of the game that was played by the Chinese.

As for Bradely, he is a good player, but it's obvious that you Americans like to over-rate anything. I'd take Nainggolan because:

1) I believe he is the better, more complete player
2) From a marketing perspective, he'd be the logical choice (Indonesia is a soccer mad country with a population of over 230 million people)
3) Nainggolan is a better looking dude

 

[Bianconero_Aus]

Harvest me some wheat, boy.

 

[Bianconero81]

I'm not Joe

 

[Bjerknes]

Sepak Takraw was first played in Malaysia and Thailand. It's derived from an older form of the game that was played by the Chinese.

As for Bradely, he is a good player, but it's obvious that you Americans like to over-rate anything. I'd take Nainggolan because:

1) I believe he is the better, more complete player
2) From a marketing perspective, he'd be the logical choice (Indonesia is a soccer mad country with a population of over 230 million people)
3) Nainggolan is a better looking dude

This is what I said.

Bradley is a good water carrier. Bradley would be a good tactical option. Bradley covers a lot of ground. Bradley would be a no brainer signing if he was available.

None of which is "overrating."

If anything, people underrate American players because they are American.

 

[GordoDeCentral]

bradley is good, but he wont be more than a sub a here, which i doubt hed be ok with.

 

[Bianconero81]

I want Suarez

 

[JuventusMark]

Suarez is impossible please get over him, it will never happen.

 

[Bianconero81]

Fuck you

Let me believe. Don't be such a sour puss like Zac