he's not as good as people say he's allright but he's not the world beater that he's valued at. it's fuc*** how highly priced and overated players are these days. also I have no idea why the hell we gave 50 percent of immobiles rights to genoa just loan him without a fee ffs
---------- Post added 29.08.2012 at 13:12 ----------
Getting him on loan wouldn't be that bad. We're not spending money on medicore short-term fixes and save the money for winter/next summer. He'll not be a star here but I can see him scoring some goals for us. He's younger and definitely better than both Quag and Matri. Better ball skills, decent header and he's stronger.
That's not what I was hoping for (JoJo, Dzeko) but on loan we don't waste money and keep them for someone better.
I have to say that its really embarassing that we're trying to pursue Bendtner..Really embarassing for one of the biggest spenders in the transfer Market and the current Italian Champions..I really really hope its fake.
Getting him on loan wouldn't be that bad. We're not spending money on medicore short-term fixes and save the money for winter/next summer. He'll not be a star here but I can see him scoring some goals for us. He's younger and definitely better than both Quag and Matri. Better ball skills, decent header and he's stronger.
That's not what I was hoping for (JoJo, Dzeko) but on loan we don't waste money and keep them for someone better.
To be honest, Bendtner wouldn't be that bad. He impressed me at the EURO and the way he can hold up the ball up front, let the ball drop to the midfielders, he could work out very well here! Loan Deal even better as its cheap!
Well maybe you're right he's nothing special, but Matri is really clueless. He just runs and barely scores, but that's not enough. I'd prefer take Bendtner on loan and pray for him to succeed, than relying only on Matri. He's got no potential to improve whatsoever.
We were supposed to get a classy striker and once again we settle with a short-term random solution