Wishlist and General Juve mercato talk (2012-13) (33 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.

ZoSo

Senior Member
Jul 11, 2011
41,656
Pazzini is a good striker, but so is Matri. They are very similar. Making it a pointless signing.
This, Pazzini is hardly even likeable. Matri is better imo and Quag is a different type of player (and also better) thus we would be going backwards if we sign him and get rid of one of Quag & Matri.
 

Bianconero81

Ageing Veteran
Jan 26, 2009
40,174
Could we please focus on closing the deals for Jovetic and Armero first? This fucking Pazzini deal can wait. It's not even a big deal if we lost out on him. However, it would suck monkey balls if we acquire him and this compromises/scuppers the JoJo deal. I'd call the Mercato a fail if that scenario were to transpire.
 

baggio

Senior Member
Jun 3, 2003
19,250
I think off the lot, the most accessible is JoJo and Fiorentina are willing since we're able. But I the feeling I get, is we've put this move on hold because there are some people ahead of JoJo on Conte's list. The usual suspects, and I don't think we'd close JoJo till we know for a fact that players like Cavani and RvP have resolved their futures elsewhere. Also, new links to Ramirez, may not necessarily be a bad thing, as it could still mean we'd get him plus a higher profile forward than Pazzo/Destro, unlike in the JoJo case where it would sure be Pazzo/Destro to fill the CF spot which would not be a significant upgrade over what we have, and therefore wouldn't necessarily count as a positive reinforcement.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 32)