Winter mercato 2022 (53 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Jun 16, 2020
12,435
We don't even own Morata :shifty:

So we buy him just so we can ship him out again? How much money will that Morata adventure, including the expensive loans, cost us at the end of the day?
Probably we get 5m compensation from Baca/Atletico since we paid 10m for a full season and we’ll save the rest of his wages, what should be 5m net for this full season

So overall we’ll save ~8m I think. But his total value (10m loan + ~7m gross wages) would be the biggest difference in the books.

This is what I think tho.
 

petszata

Junior Member
Jul 7, 2020
489
Looks like we will end up dealing with Barca and get some idiots in swap deal for MDL. Like - useless Dembele or Memphis `I am not for a big club` Depay. I hope we will get at least 75-80 then we can think about strikers (Vlahovic soon will be out of reach so plan B or C here)
 

Gigiventus

Senior Member
Mar 3, 2017
3,281
We are not getting Dembele. He is asking far too much money and he is an idiot.

Burned bridges with Rennes, Dortmund, and looks like he will do it again with Barca. Waste of a talent.
 

cimenk

Senior Member
Jul 23, 2008
3,135
Agresti apparently named Aubameyang

Personally I believe we’ll go for Scamacca. Make sense using the money we save on Morata for Scamacca if we really want him next summer anyway
Agree.
I would only give him to Barca if Barca pay some fee that we paid to Atleti. And it worth it and help us get replacement like Scamacca

Otherwise, i would keep Morata until end of the season. All the name mentioned like Icardi, Milik are downgrade from Morata. We should also think on team perspective getting player in mid season
 

Siamak

╭∩╮( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)╭∩╮
Aug 13, 2013
18,476
#Vlahovic ❌
#Cavani ❌
#Martial ❌
#Milik ❌
#Muriel ❌
#Scamacca ❌
#Lacazette ❌
#Aubameyang?
#Depay?
Other names?
 

DanielSz

Senior Member
Sep 6, 2014
14,357
Agresti apparently named Aubameyang

Personally I believe we’ll go for Scamacca. Make sense using the money we save on Morata for Scamacca if we really want him next summer anyway
Scamacca is the most realistic and checks the most boxes. Fits the timeline age wise, and is the prototype 9 for Allegri. Just get it done.

btw how would a Morata deal even work? Technically he’s not a Juve player, so why would we get compensation instead of ATM?
 
Jun 16, 2020
12,435
Scamacca is the most realistic and checks the most boxes. Fits the timeline age wise, and is the prototype 9 for Allegri. Just get it done.

btw how would a Morata deal even work? Technically he’s not a Juve player, so why would we get compensation instead of ATM?
We paid 10m for a full season not a half season so I reckon that we get 5m back and that Barca will pay 5m to Atletico
 

Orgut

Senior Member
Dec 31, 2002
19,332
Vlahovic - Yes - Exactly what we need
Scammacca - Tough to bet on someone who doesnt even has one season full of goals under his belt. I think we should skip unless its a really low cost (and its not)
Dembele - It would be stupid on our part as he will mostly be injured and he is also a troublemaker.
Depay - Not a bad idea as he can also come from the left - The problem is he is not a freebie anymore and for cost+wages we might have better options out there..
 

tosh_rose

Senior Member
Aug 21, 2010
1,465
Potential Scamacca deal would work only if we send player(s) to Sassuolo and of course give them some discount for option/obligation, because we nice people...

So Kaio to Sass for 18 months loan plus option and another young player, most likely one of the two Serie B guys with Ranocchia being the obvious choice...
18 months loan plus option/obligation for Scamacca in exchange for 18 months loan plus option/obligation for Kaio and Ranocchia. Both Kaio and Ranocchia has to have buy-back clause included in their contracts, something like that would be nice and doable...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 40)