Winter Mercato 2015 (42 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.

reallegends

Senior Member
Jan 12, 2013
744
Considering what they paid for him,Mata is almost impossible to bring under 30 million and we will probably not pay that kind of money for someone who looks more and more to have benefited from Chelsea's system rather than individual quality.Overrated and not worth the price
 

Zacheryah

Senior Member
Aug 29, 2010
42,251
Dear, if you have a player that is showing huge potential, and is doing that for the entire first 6 months of his stay, it would be foolish to spend on a player that would block him. I'm kinda talking about El Sharaawy first half of his first milan season. Big talent and potential

Imagine if Fabregas would have been available last summer and for some reason for a very low fee we could pay, when Pogba just pushed Marchisio out of the team. Would be foolish to block a big time talent.
 

Raz

Senior Member
Nov 20, 2005
12,218
Wait what? If it's possible to bring in Mata it would be stupid not to bring him in here. The guy is a world class player and have lots of years in him. And not buying fabregas for a low fee would be even more stupid.

But yeah, I know you want to be special and hip with your flair and fancy opinions that are shared by no one but you and argue them till death with your phd arguments so please, write another wall of text how you are right in your mind and everybody is wrong.

Again, what you are saying is stupid, not buying a world class player because we might have one youngling on our hands who only could become one is fucking retarded, specially when you mention such circumstances as in low cost.
 

Badass J Elkann

It's time to go!!
Feb 12, 2006
69,013
Wait what? If it's possible to bring in Mata it would be stupid not to bring him in here. The guy is a world class player and have lots of years in him. And not buying fabregas for a low fee would be even more stupid.
Question is where would be play? Hes innefective out wide meaning he will either hinder coman's progress and we'll be pretty much tied with a 4-3-1-2 system
 

Raz

Senior Member
Nov 20, 2005
12,218
If we buy Mata I wouldn't care if we use Coman only for shining Mata's boots.

Why buy an already established young world class player when you have 18 year old who has a chance to become one in three years. Great logic.

Mata is an attacking midfield player, I think we would find a place for him.

I'm not saying we will get him or should go for him, I'm just saying that not signing someone of his quality because some kid is in our team in his position is retarded.
 

Osman

Koul Khara!
Aug 30, 2002
61,503
We have no AMs and only one winger in this team, and he's 18 and just had his first fucking game (I dont count Pepe, because, who the heck thinks he matters), and still there's people who would say no to a top 3 best AM around in the game. Ludicrous. Even in teams filled with AM/winger options they would buy him, but us who barely have any? Come the fuck on.
 

Raz

Senior Member
Nov 20, 2005
12,218
We have no AMs and only one winger in this team, and he's 18 and just had his first fucking game (I dont count Pepe, because, who the heck thinks he matters), and still there's people who would say no to a top 3 best AM around in the game. Ludicrous. Even in teams filled with AM/winger options they would buy him, but us who barely have any? Come the fuck on.
Just wait one sec while you have to read a series of wall of texts how what you say there is laughable and how you are wrong and are delusional, mostly because you lack phd knowledge of this thing called soccer.

It's really shocking to see people think like that. Declinging Mata because of Coman :lol:
 

Bianconero_Aus

Beppe Marotta Is My God
May 26, 2009
81,127
We have no AMs and only one winger in this team, and he's 18 and just had his first fucking game (I dont count Pepe, because, who the heck thinks he matters), and still there's people who would say no to a top 3 best AM around in the game. Ludicrous. Even in teams filled with AM/winger options they would buy him, but us who barely have any? Come the fuck on.
Mata would be an orgasmic signing. We don't have many creative players, or AMs, and he'd fit us like a glove. Too bad he'd be as expensive as fuck, and we wouldn't in a million years be able to afford him.
 

Raz

Senior Member
Nov 20, 2005
12,218
Mata is a significant investment. Why would we sign Mata when we have a great talent comming trough, if there are other area's to improve ?

Should we have gotten Weah in 1995 When we had the massive prodigy of Del Piero in our ranks ?
Nothing to add here.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 42)