Tradition means nothing these days and those guaranteed trophies are Serie A titles and maybe Coppa Italia.
Those things can be won with those other clubs as well and there he'd have a real shot at winning the Champions League with most of them.
Also, naming Chelsea as a "traditional" team over City's pretty interesting. At least City had a history of winning something(even if it was a long time ago) before they were sold to a billionaire, while Chelsea won nothing prior to being owned by Abramowich.
1st, the bolded part. i didnt say Chelsea is a traditional club. but City also doesent have more tradition than them. and simply having more titles doesent make you a more traditional club. if that was so, Nurnberg would be a more traditional club than Dortmund or Gladbach which isnt true.
League titles before 2004: City 2, Chelsea 1
FA Cups before 2004: City 4, Chelsea 3
League Cups before 2004: City 2, Chelsea 2
Cup winners Cup: City 1, Chelsea 2
UEFA Super Cup: Chelsea 1
also, keep in ind that Chelsea played CL before Abramovich (in 2000) when they went out to Barca (3-1, 1-5) in the QF. they then finished 4th and qualified for the CL again in 2003 by beating their direct rival Liverpool one year before Abramovich buyed them. You can see that they were an important club in English football before Abramovich too while City was in the 2nd and even 3rd division sometimes. Chelsea also have some players that spent there a long periond of time like Lampard, Tery, Drogba or Cech which makes them somehow likeable for some people unlike City who ditched their captain Steven Ireland as soon as they became a money club. but thats not the point. The point is, Chelsea is the only club from these new generation money-clubs who has established themself as a top European club. Playing CL semifinals 8 times in the past 11 seasons (2 finals and one title) with one QF exit, two R16 exits, and a group stage exit (which resulted in another European trophy) and all this when City struggles to even finish 3rd in they group in the past 4 years and the one time they finished 2nd they were eliminated immediately speaks of how supperior Chelsea is to City when it comes to European Cups. im telling you this to show you that 1st City doesent have more tradition than Chelsea (even when both dont have much of it) and 2nd that Chelsea is a more wanted destination for most footballers today (better project and more success)
now to the 1st part of your post. ofcourse those guaranteed trophies are Serie A and maybe Coppa Italia. can any club in Europe promise him that he would win a CL if he joins them? no. no-one can guarantee you CL trophies no matter how much money, tradition or quality they have. but my point was that Juventus, WITH Reus in the squad (and maybe one or two more signings), could become a CL contender. one of the strongest and most organized defensive teams in Europe (with Barzagli maybe the strongest) with a player like Reus upfront to support Tevez would be deadly (keep in mind that i said we only have a chance to get him if we reach a CL semifinal or sell Vidal and assuming that he would accept 6-7M salary). you cant say Reus wont think about it if we send an offer. winning serie A every year and being competitive for the CL while being one of 2-3 best players in the team surely is something to think about.
but since its only november now, and we have no clue how things would stand in march, april or may, lets talk about the winter mercato and leave the Reus talks for the summer mercato thread.
- - - Updated - - -
I'd really like us to get Lazio's Keita.
Him and Coman, dat pace
Morata/Gabbiadini
Keita - Coman - Berardi
/rakibOFF
fixed. now you sound like rakib