Which dictator killed the most people? (5 Viewers)
- Thread starter ReBeL
- Start date
Genghis Khan would have killed the most in terms of overall world population percentage, I'm pretty sure.
Caracalla was most likely the most blood thirsty Roman emperor, he massacred the Christians, Germanians, Persians amongst others, it is thought in many of his conquests he would have most of the male population killed, even in large cities.
Caracalla was most likely the most blood thirsty Roman emperor, he massacred the Christians, Germanians, Persians amongst others, it is thought in many of his conquests he would have most of the male population killed, even in large cities.
If it wasn't for some of those dictators killing people, many of us wouldn't exist at all.
Just think about it. If uncle Hitler, for example, didn't start the war and so many people didn't die, maybe our grandmothers or great grandmothers wouldn't have met our grandfathers and they'd have married someone who died in the war (and wouldn't have died if there was no war), and so on and so on. The odds for us not to exist are becoming even stronger as you go back in the past.
We should be thankful to these people.
Just think about it. If uncle Hitler, for example, didn't start the war and so many people didn't die, maybe our grandmothers or great grandmothers wouldn't have met our grandfathers and they'd have married someone who died in the war (and wouldn't have died if there was no war), and so on and so on. The odds for us not to exist are becoming even stronger as you go back in the past.
We should be thankful to these people.
as much as i find hitler interesting...and i am far removed from any semblance of a Zionist...to suggest that we should be thankful to hitler, is truly fkn appalling...and makes me count you instantly, alen, as an element of a bloodline, i would gladly destroy in its entirety, had i the chance////
'he means it purely in jest' part of my mind suggests...but there is not 'jest', to smiling in any way at the existence and life and actions, of a man, who demanded and made damn sure, that millions of innocent people were viciously massacred...
where the hell are you from??? serbia???
'he means it purely in jest' part of my mind suggests...but there is not 'jest', to smiling in any way at the existence and life and actions, of a man, who demanded and made damn sure, that millions of innocent people were viciously massacred...
where the hell are you from??? serbia???
If it wasn't for some of those dictators killing people, many of us wouldn't exist at all.
Just think about it. If uncle Hitler, for example, didn't start the war and so many people didn't die, maybe our grandmothers or great grandmothers wouldn't have met our grandfathers and they'd have married someone who died in the war (and wouldn't have died if there was no war), and so on and so on. The odds for us not to exist are becoming even stronger as you go back in the past.
We should be thankful to these people.
Just think about it. If uncle Hitler, for example, didn't start the war and so many people didn't die, maybe our grandmothers or great grandmothers wouldn't have met our grandfathers and they'd have married someone who died in the war (and wouldn't have died if there was no war), and so on and so on. The odds for us not to exist are becoming even stronger as you go back in the past.
We should be thankful to these people.
It depends if you believe in the soul, I could be a Cambodian living below the poverty line. Otherwise, if you are never born you don't miss it.
I think media played a major factor there, Hitler's crimes were focused on more than anyone else's, obviously because he killed jews but if he had killed the same or even 10x the number of Arabs they'd have called it a war on terrorism to introduce demacracy and human rights for 3rd world countires
I find Bush as much of a criminal as Hitler
I must admit thoughm, Mao is shocking, never expected it
I find Bush as much of a criminal as Hitler
I must admit thoughm, Mao is shocking, never expected it
you're right
Well in terms of numbers, Mao undoubtedly is number 1, with probably about 50 million deaths. However, it is true that he had more people to kill than the others.
As for the "worst dictator category", it would be Hitler for me. I study in history and I have had courses on both Stalinist Russia and Nazi Germany and as much as Stalin was evil, Hitler was just worst.
Stalin killed lots of people because he wanted to assure his own legacy and safety. He was a paranoid who killed everyone that was in his way to guaranty his own welfare. Hitler, on the other hand, killed millions of people for the alleged science of eugenics. He killed many for their skin colors, religions, mental abilities, etc.
Stalinist Russia, as awful as it was, was not worst than Nazi Germany.
As for the "worst dictator category", it would be Hitler for me. I study in history and I have had courses on both Stalinist Russia and Nazi Germany and as much as Stalin was evil, Hitler was just worst.
Stalin killed lots of people because he wanted to assure his own legacy and safety. He was a paranoid who killed everyone that was in his way to guaranty his own welfare. Hitler, on the other hand, killed millions of people for the alleged science of eugenics. He killed many for their skin colors, religions, mental abilities, etc.
Stalinist Russia, as awful as it was, was not worst than Nazi Germany.