++ [ originally posted by Geof ] ++
I agree with most of that.
When I said that Brussels would be shithole without EU and NATO, I meant it on international level. Of course I realize that it's a very nice city. Plus, as one said to me, it's a big capital at human size, unlike Paris or London.
True on the image of the Eurocrats too. But they coud spend most of their easy-earned money in Brussels, and we have to exploit that more. And of course there is the housing problem. Living in the city centre is too expensive for a normal human being, even the Marolles are becoming a posh place to live. Which is a pity. We're losing the popular side of the city. The real Brusseleers can't afford to live in their own city anymore.
Who's to blame for that? The EU for paying them too much? The Eurocrats for their mentality? The city council, which seems to do nothing against it? Can't really blame the owners who accept the highest bid...
But this problem is the same in every major city isnt'it?
Yes but it affects a city like Brussels far more than, say, the UN in New York or even in Geneva (them Swiss are already stinky rich anyway:groan

.
The solution is quite simple I think : make them pay taxes!
Of course their salaries would have to remain relatively high in order for them to still want to work here, so let's say a 25/30 % taxation.
That would constitute a nice little amount of money you could directly invest in other things, while the housing market and the cost of living would stop soaring like they currently are.
Unfortunately this is all theoretical, as the Belgian gov't has not much to say in this, and the day it enforces such measures on the EU they'll probably just move elsewhere. Change has to come from the inside, so this is likely to take a long time.
Oh yeah and that ridiculous retirement scheme needs to be scrapped as well. When a EU civil servant retires and goes back to his country of origin, his pension is calculated according to the cost of living in the CAPITAL of said country.
Brussels' cost of living is used as a reference (100). This means that if you are, say, a British civil servant who decides to move back to the UK after retirement, you will receive something like a 60% bonus besides your already very generous pension (since London is the most expensive capital in Europe), no matter where in the UK you actually go live.
So what do these guys actually do? They buy a flat in Grimsby and officially claim to be living there, while in fact spending 11 months out of 12 in their fat house in Brussels.
While the Commission is supposed to supervise this, very few controls are actually implemented, and the Franco-British lobby (for once working together, as Paris comes second in terms of living costs) is refusing to change the system.
On the other hand, if you are a retired Greek and want to move back to Greece, you will receive less than the 100% reference. So they will do the opposite, i.e. claim to still live here in order to get the 100% while being de facto back in Greece.
Ever noticed how many over 60 Brits and French there are in Brussels while their Portuguese and Greek counterparts are nowhere to be seen?