No, it wouldn't.
In Chicago, and NYC, and ATL, and Oklahoma City, where there are larger tax bases to support that, sure. To say blankly "it's a good thing" is true on its face, but there is no way there is enough financial support for that to be true across the United States as a whole. Especially when a large percentage of them already operate at a deficit.
- - - Updated - - -
Well, you said earlier "remove people who do dumb shit." So, are you talking about crimes, driving violations, or just plain idiocy? If it's crimes or driving violations, you're talking about having them excluded from society, so, exclusive there. If you mean, "some people" shouldn't HAVE Driver's Licenses, then you are talking about either raising the standards, or being exclusionary by restriction of rights/privileges by some other metric.
My point is, if you have X population doing something, and you enact rules, laws, or standards to make that population X-1, then it's exclusive by definition.