Juvenann

Senior Member
Sep 3, 2018
1,248
Sure... with my phone with a shitty camera. :D Anyway, I doubt photographer will be a happy one :lol2:
Why not? Is it the same camera with which you took the bracelets's photo? Its quality is enough to photograph a wedding.
I like weddings, I can dance a lot and eat a lot. You don't like dancing?

She can pee on my tree.
Min 0:40 :shifty:.

Man, I have such a bad feeling about tonights match. I think it's gonna be horrible to watch.
Me too. Especially since Mandzo has been injured.
 

Dostoevsky

Tzu
Administrator
May 27, 2007
88,980
Why not? Is it the same camera with which you took the bracelets's photo? Its quality is enough to photograph a wedding.
I like weddings, I can dance a lot and eat a lot. You don't like dancing?
Because it will be a mini crime nest. Chances are high to see some shit happen.

Haha, not really. That camera is shit. On a weddin there's a person holding ~2k euro camera. It can't be compared with a phone camera. Phone is just used among friends really :p

No. I find dancing awkward and I can only enjoy watching it. From distance.
 

DAiDEViL

Senior Member
Feb 21, 2015
64,590
Because it will be a mini crime nest. Chances are high to see some shit happen.

Haha, not really. That camera is shit. On a weddin there's a person holding ~2k euro camera. It can't be compared with a phone camera. Phone is just used among friends really :p

No. I find dancing awkward and I can only enjoy watching it. From distance.
I wouldn't bring a 2k camera to a wedding :p

Entry level DSLR is good enough for your average wedding pictures. As if them instagram-filter fools could spot the difference. Even pros having a hard time to tell them apart.
 

Juvenann

Senior Member
Sep 3, 2018
1,248
Because it will be a mini crime nest. Chances are high to see some shit happen.

Haha, not really. That camera is shit. On a weddin there's a person holding ~2k euro camera. It can't be compared with a phone camera. Phone is just used among friends really :p

No. I find dancing awkward and I can only enjoy watching it. From distance.
Then your camera will be in line with the level of the wedding :p.

You don't know how to dance or you just don't like it? I hope you enjoy the wedding anyway.
 

Seven

In bocca al lupo, Fabio.
Jun 25, 2003
39,323
Why not? Is it the same camera with which you took the bracelets's photo? Its quality is enough to photograph a wedding.
I like weddings, I can dance a lot and eat a lot. You don't like dancing?


Min 0:40 :shifty:.


Me too. Especially since Mandzo has been injured.
I wouldn't bring a 2k camera to a wedding

Entry level DSLR is good enough for your average wedding pictures. As if them instagram-filter fools could spot the difference. Even pros having a hard time to tell them apart.
No. Just no. There is a very obvious difference between pictures taken with a camera phone and those taken with a professional camera. And we're talking about pictures you want to see again in fifty years time.


Verstuurd vanaf mijn ONEPLUS A6003 met Tapatalk
 

DAiDEViL

Senior Member
Feb 21, 2015
64,590
No. Just no. There is a very obvious difference between pictures taken with a camera phone and those taken with a professional camera. And we're talking about pictures you want to see again in fifty years time.
Obviously. And i didn't disagree with that at all. They don't have to be 2k is what i said. Plenty of pros shooting on Micro 4/3 cameras or APSC. Cheapest Sony full frame is like €800. All of them can get you perfect pro results in the right hands.
 
Last edited:

Seven

In bocca al lupo, Fabio.
Jun 25, 2003
39,323
Obviously. And i didn't disagree with that at all. They don't have to be 2k is what i said. Plenty of pros shooting on Micro 4/3 cameras or APSC. Cheapest Sony full frame is like €800. All of them can get you perfect pro results in the right hands.
For a wedding maybe, yes. But tbh in terms of cameras 2k is very easily reached. I took it as if you felt it was an obscene amount, which I don't think is true for a camera.

And you're right about them having to be in the right hands.

Verstuurd vanaf mijn ONEPLUS A6003 met Tapatalk
 

DAiDEViL

Senior Member
Feb 21, 2015
64,590
For a wedding maybe, yes. But tbh in terms of cameras 2k is very easily reached. I took it as if you felt it was an obscene amount, which I don't think is true for a camera.

And you're right about them having to be in the right hands.
It is easily reached, however, you are able to shoot everything from weddings over portraits all the way to professional commercials on cameras half the price and close to no one will spot the difference, as sensors have reached great quality, even on entry level DSLR's.
 

swag

L'autista
Administrator
Sep 23, 2003
84,750
Obviously. And i didn't disagree with that at all. They don't have to be 2k is what i said. Plenty of pros shooting on Micro 4/3 cameras or APSC. Cheapest Sony full frame is like €800. All of them can get you perfect pro results in the right hands.
I honestly thought everyone understood that we're at a point where pixels are meaningless and everything is about the analog lens.
 

s4tch

Senior Member
Mar 23, 2015
33,559
I honestly thought everyone understood that we're at a point where pixels are meaningless and everything is about the analog lens.
+ image processing algorithm

btw i still use my nikon d40 despite its modest resolution (6 mp) and ancient sensor. a cheap 35mm lens makes it a brilliant tool.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 1, Guests: 184)