ALC

Ohaulick
Oct 28, 2010
46,035
I can pm you the test results tonite :boh:

Edit: tested also other things like HIV by this opportunity tho.
Maybe you have it and it hasn’t fully developed into chlamydia yet.

- - - Updated - - -

Finasteride is a derivate of the most powerfull steroid on the market : trenbolone. (you gotto have seen all dem memes).

increasing hormonal levels, has a chance to mess up your HPTA. the stronger the androgenic value, the bigger the chance. Thats why roiders user synthetic testosterone along with steroids (a steroid is synthetic testosterone with an alteration in the structure to give different effects)

You take a derivate, you run the risk. How big it is, i dont know. No one does.

Some people get erectile disfynction from high blood pressure medication for example, others dont.


Likely, its rather small. And its oral, so the ester is very short and fast acting. quick onset, quick offset. Try it and see.

- - - Updated - - -



Thanks :)

We got solars on the roof, and they directly feed the house supply and back into the grid.

Our green energy plan was retarded (it was made by a socialist, obviously). You generate electricity and put it into the grid. But transformers can only handle 5% fluctuation of this, so this never works if plenty do it. If you need energy, you take back.

for every 1000kwh you put into the grid, you get a payment. We bought these certiciates from the previous owner and receive 230 euro/1000kwh and we generate more power than we use so itsa net positive

Thats retarded

They should encourage the use of battery based systems. Make ur own energy, and draw from the grid if short, but dont put in it.


Oh and we switched wye cause as you say, efficient, but not everywhere cause belgium is slow and old and socialist as fuck
That’s free money, good shit. I don’t have my own house but would definitely get solar if I did. :tup:
 

Maddy

Oracle of Copenhagen
Jul 10, 2009
16,541
Last night a girl texted me and told me she has a Chlamydia infection, she got tested yesterday. She made also a test last November (dunno what's wrong with her:shifty:) which has been negative and I slept with her twice in December and February.
She tried to be nice, but between the lines she blamed me for this mess, so that she got the infection from me.
Today I made the test and it's negative. Now she's confused, cause she says she hasn't had unprotected sex with other guys during this time. ::lol3:: Kind of funny.

@Maddy - self-appointed King of Chlamydia - you have a similar story to tell?
One of you is lying.

Girls always lie about this stuff. They don't wanna look slutty; especially not unprotected slutty. Liek we care. Inexperienced and insecure girls are shite in the sack

- - - Updated - - -

Maybe you have it and it hasn’t fully developed into chlamydia yet.
Confident you can test for Chlamydia no more than 5-10 days post-exposure.
 

Zacheryah

Senior Member
Aug 29, 2010
42,251
No. Belgium is neither the most socialist country in the World nor is it socialist. Belgium is a Welfare State based on a capitalistic system; sitting somewhere between Social Democracy (Scandinavia) and Conservative/Corporatist (Germany, France)
In Belgium, we are taxed to around 56% of our income. There is time unrestricted wellfare (only nation in the world who has) and very little "push" to force people back into working. The welfare is astoundingly close to the minimum wage. We have social housing thats rather easy to abuse, and a variety of support for all layers of the population. We are rather lax on "welfare migration". Unions hold rather massive power, and if shitty cant fart, we have 3 weeks of striking. It takes insane measures to fire a person, and everything is overly protected.
We have basically free health care, basically free but rather high standard educations. We got cash money per child you spawn, increasing per child.

And if you dare make money without a significant part comming from shiftbonusses, you get taxed into oblivion.

I'm this engineer peasant. My employer pays €4650/month for me, of which i merely get €1900 and a company car(VW polo on lease, cause that costs half as much as paying it in extra cash). My bonusses are taxed 70%.

A fucking peasant that lives alone gets close to €1000 euro, and social housing.


Please tell me in what country i'd get ripped off even more, to pay some workunwilling slut with 7 kids who sits at home with a drunk bastard father that doesnt work.
 

Seven

In bocca al lupo, Fabio.
Jun 25, 2003
38,289
No. Belgium is neither the most socialist country in the World nor is it socialist. Belgium is a Welfare State based on a capitalistic system; sitting somewhere between Social Democracy (Scandinavia) and Conservative/Corporatist (Germany, France)
Agreed.

In Belgium, we are taxed to around 56% of our income. There is time unrestricted wellfare (only nation in the world who has) and very little "push" to force people back into working. The welfare is astoundingly close to the minimum wage. We have social housing thats rather easy to abuse, and a variety of support for all layers of the population. We are rather lax on "welfare migration". Unions hold rather massive power, and if shitty cant fart, we have 3 weeks of striking. It takes insane measures to fire a person, and everything is overly protected.
We have basically free health care, basically free but rather high standard educations. We got cash money per child you spawn, increasing per child.

And if you dare make money without a significant part comming from shiftbonusses, you get taxed into oblivion.

I'm this engineer peasant. My employer pays €4650/month for me, of which i merely get €1900 and a company car(VW polo on lease, cause that costs half as much as paying it in extra cash). My bonusses are taxed 70%.

A fucking peasant that lives alone gets close to €1000 euro, and social housing.


Please tell me in what country i'd get ripped off even more, to pay some workunwilling slut with 7 kids who sits at home with a drunk bastard father that doesnt work.


There are flaws within our system. Mostly, there are inexplicable differences between categories of people. As I am self employed much more of my wages goes to taxes and social contributions. I get that there can be a slight difference with employees, as I have deductibles, but the difference is astronomical.

Of everything you said I think the most important part is that if you're in the bottom half as far as your wages are concerned, you don't get that much more than if you were to rely solely on benefits. People don't work only for money, but obviously it is still the most important reason. No one is going to work an entire month if the difference is 100 Euros.
 

Fred

Senior Member
Oct 2, 2003
41,113
In Belgium, we are taxed to around 56% of our income. There is time unrestricted wellfare (only nation in the world who has) and very little "push" to force people back into working. The welfare is astoundingly close to the minimum wage. We have social housing thats rather easy to abuse, and a variety of support for all layers of the population. We are rather lax on "welfare migration". Unions hold rather massive power, and if shitty cant fart, we have 3 weeks of striking. It takes insane measures to fire a person, and everything is overly protected.
We have basically free health care, basically free but rather high standard educations. We got cash money per child you spawn, increasing per child.

And if you dare make money without a significant part comming from shiftbonusses, you get taxed into oblivion.

I'm this engineer peasant. My employer pays €4650/month for me, of which i merely get €1900 and a company car(VW polo on lease, cause that costs half as much as paying it in extra cash). My bonusses are taxed 70%.

A fucking peasant that lives alone gets close to €1000 euro, and social housing.


Please tell me in what country i'd get ripped off even more, to pay some workunwilling slut with 7 kids who sits at home with a drunk bastard father that doesnt work.
That is terrible, I don't think anyone can defend that. You don't have to be capitalist to say that there has to be a difference between those who work and those who don't, especially if you are young and able.
 

Seven

In bocca al lupo, Fabio.
Jun 25, 2003
38,289
That is terrible, I don't think anyone can defend that. You don't have to be capitalist to say that there has to be a difference between those who work and those who don't, especially if you are young and able.
It's a difficult debate imo.

On the one hand you can't allow people to whither and die just because they don't work. And I don't just mean physical death. Welfare that is too low causes social isolation and really doesn't help people get out of the hole.

I think the problem in Belgium is that we have quite low wages for unskilled work.
 

Seven

In bocca al lupo, Fabio.
Jun 25, 2003
38,289
As I said Belgium is a Welfare State based on a capitalistic system, not a Socialist State as you claimed.
Zach doesn't get that distinction.

Also, not all our money goes to supporting drunk, abusive and sex crazed parents who produce children in order to get child support. In fact I think most of our resources probably go to our healthcare system, which ranks among the best in the world. But that's Zach for you.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 2, Guests: 802)