Bjerknes

"Top Economist"
Mar 16, 2004
116,151
whats cracking guys?

andy why the world trade centers?
We are approaching the 11th of September. I think it's time we called for more investigation of the attacks.

Also, the 11th coincides with a cycle shift in the "Gann Death Cycles", which is basically a turning point after 180 days of stock market behavior, possibly signaling a major trend change in our economy. It will be an entirely negative trend change, meaning bad news.

This stuff is extremely difficult to explain, but the numerology is adding up to be extremely weird these days. It will be an interesting September and October.
 

Salvo

J
Moderator
Dec 17, 2007
62,842
hmm, i agree with there needing to be more investigations.

sadly i dont no much about the stock market though.

with september 11 though are you one of the conspiracy theorists?
 

Bjerknes

"Top Economist"
Mar 16, 2004
116,151
hmm, i agree with there needing to be more investigations.

sadly i dont no much about the stock market though.

with september 11 though are you one of the conspiracy theorists?
If you want to use that terminology, then yes.

There is no concrete evidence Osama Bin Laden orchestrated the attacks, which is why the FBI does not cite said attacks on his profile, and one-third of the supposed hijackers are still alive. Everybody should be demanding more investigation because nothing adds up.
 

Salvo

J
Moderator
Dec 17, 2007
62,842
wow really? still alive?

ye look i think it was total bullshit, something fishy went down. a lot of it didnt add up, not sure if this is entirely true but wasnt there something odd about how the buildings collapsed aswell?
 

Bjerknes

"Top Economist"
Mar 16, 2004
116,151
I'm no expert in structural engineering, but some experts have claimed that there was thermite in the buildings, a substance used in demolitions. If you look at the video, there are certain trademarks to how the buildings came down, similar to demolitions. But the real giveaway, IMO, is Building 7, the one that was brought down hours after the attack. The media first reported that 7 had structural deficiencies and could collapse, something not true due to how the building was situated around the Towers. But later the media and the building owner admitted that they were going to bring down 7, specifically for the purpose of safely destroying a building that would eventually collapse. The problem is that it takes days, but most probably more than a week, to safely set the charges to successfully orchestrate a controlled demolition of a building of that size. People have to realize that professionals had only about 6 hours to work with after the planes hit to set up the charges. That's not enough time.

All of the surrounding buildings next to the twin towers did not collapse or needed to be demolished, but yet this one building did despite not being directly adjacent to Ground Zero. Just for disclosure, B7 housed offices of Arthur Anderson, the defunct Enron buddies, along with some investment bank offices and FBI/CIA substations. But these facts don't really matter.

I don't understand why these supposedly "sane, non-conspiracy theorists realists" don't even call for more investigation. I understand why they might not believe what I have to say, but if they read the 9/11 Commission Report, they should at least acknowledge that more investigation would be a good thing, but they don't. They want to brush it under the rug.
 

Salvo

J
Moderator
Dec 17, 2007
62,842
ye it was all planed, an excuse to attack iraq? for the oil?

if all this info is out there especially to the american public why hasnt there been further investigation?
 

Bjerknes

"Top Economist"
Mar 16, 2004
116,151
ye it was all planed, an excuse to attack iraq? for the oil?

if all this info is out there especially to the american public why hasnt there been further investigation?
Well, you said it yourself. I am a conspiracy theorist. And as such, this stuff is not tolerated in the United States because if so, you're anti-American.

The public equates investigation into the matter with disrespecting the victims of the attacks, even though many of their family members are 9/11 Truthers.

That's all you need to know, basically.
 

Bjerknes

"Top Economist"
Mar 16, 2004
116,151
That's basically the deal. Either that or you're a nut case. People don't even listen to such facts because it's simply too difficult for them to believe that our own government brought down the towers. Chris Matthews of Hardball said it himself: he will not tolerate any stupid theories about 9/11 because it's not American.

That says it all.
 

Salvo

J
Moderator
Dec 17, 2007
62,842
ridiculous, to seek the truth is not american. it is clear it was the government's doing otherwise why would they all be running from the truth? to deny it could very well be the most incriminating part of all
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 225)