Zé Tahir

JhoolayLaaaal!
Moderator
Dec 10, 2004
29,281
Don't you need to use regression analysis to do that?
I don't even know what that is and I'm pretty sure that's not necessary for this.

ßüякε;1923662 said:
Could you just post the whole question?

I don't have enough information to help you.
In the example my professor gave he picked a Piper Pilatus PC-12 and this is what he wrote:

1. Aircraft expenses are based on information from www.planequest.com: variable cost will be $287 per hour and the total fixed cost will be $35,000 annually with an average usage of 200 hours a year, fixed cost becomes $175 per hour for a total cost of $462 per hour.
I went to planequest.com and all it lists are the prices.
 

Zé Tahir

JhoolayLaaaal!
Moderator
Dec 10, 2004
29,281
ßüякε;1923684 said:
Yea, left side of the link there is a link to "operating costs."

I just chose the Cessna 175 randomly.

So it's possible they don't have information for some of the aircraft.
Yeah, they didn't have the one I picked but I'll just go with one they have. Good look broseph.
 

Bjerknes

"Top Economist"
Mar 16, 2004
116,170
ßüякε;1923685 said:
Give me examples, from credible sources.
I already gave you some but you refused to review it. Too bad. But we have Japan, Weimar Republic, Zimbabwe, and our own Great Depression that tells us the Keynesian approach doesn't work. Never has, never will. Especially when some of the money is appropriated towards nonsense such as regulation of hunting registration licenses in Utah.
 

Enron

Tickle Me
Moderator
Oct 11, 2005
75,665
ßüякε;1923685 said:
Give me examples, from credible sources.
It's difficult to say, while the second great war did help the economy move out of depression faster. You can't really say that Roosevelt's social programs didn't play part, the CCC, TVA, and others were ongoing into the 1960's.
 

Bjerknes

"Top Economist"
Mar 16, 2004
116,170
It's difficult to say, while the second great war did help the economy move out of depression faster. You can't really say that Roosevelt's social programs didn't play part, the CCC, TVA, and others were ongoing into the 1960's.
Production of goods got us out of the great Depression, which partly stems from the war.

We don't produce anything in this country besides websites and a few other things.
 
OP
ßöмßäяðîëя
Apr 12, 2004
77,165
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #32,679
    I already gave you some but you refused to review it. Too bad. But we have Japan, Weimar Republic, Zimbabwe, and our own Great Depression that tells us the Keynesian approach doesn't work. Never has, never will. Especially when some of the money is appropriated towards nonsense such as regulation of hunting registration licenses in Utah.
    Are all of those countries still around?
     

    Enron

    Tickle Me
    Moderator
    Oct 11, 2005
    75,665
    Production of goods got us out of the great Depression, which partly stems from the war.

    We don't produce anything in this country besides websites and a few other things.
    Still the Great Depression isn't an example you can use because of WWII. No one can say what would have happened.

    Perhaps we should start producing again? Small businesses should be the backbone of the economy. Pumping more cash into those areas would not be a bad idea.

    I'm not excited about the money given to the banks or the auto industry, but I can understand why he did it.
     

    Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 6, Guests: 152)