What Are You Doing Right Now? (946 Viewers)

[Dostoevsky]

Okay, I'll bite.

What levels?

please discuss

That isn't the trend on the world scale.

I don't care about the trend.

If we've reached a certain number of population world wide that shouldn't mean LET'S STALL THAT and cut down quite a number of new born children.

 

Buy on AliExpress.com

[Martin]

It's like "bow and it shall be given". I don't care if millions support gays, I can't see how that makes me the one who is "wrong".

Because you have nothing to support your opinion other than "I don't like them". And that is not a good argument. In fact it's a really poor one.

 

[Enron]

Why? Because I don't agree with three other people?

It's like "bow and it shall be given". I don't care if millions support gays, I can't see how that makes me the one who is "wrong".

I don't even care. If gays want to be gay, fine go be gay. If they want adopt babies they can do that too. A child could do worse than have gay parents.

 

[Dostoevsky]

Jews. Blacks. Women. Gays.

It's where we disagree. I see a huge difference there between those four and the last part is too much to accept.

We'll have to agree to disagree. Neither of us are gonna convince the other party. It's just a matter of opinion and that's about it.

 

[X Æ A-12]

I don't even care. If gays want to be gay, fine go be gay. If they want adopt babies they can do that too. A child could do worse than have gay parents.

Like end up in the foster care system.

 

[Enron]

I don't care about the trend.

If we've reached a certain number of population world wide that shouldn't mean LET'S STALL THAT and cut down quite a number of new born children.

But the trend is reality. More people are born in the world than die.

Serbia may be an exception but it's only a small piece of the puzzle.

And I don't think I said anything about stalling population growth.

 

[Enron]

It's where we disagree. I see a huge difference there between those four and the last part is too much to accept.

We'll have to agree to disagree. Neither of us are gonna convince the other party. It's just a matter of opinion and that's about it.

So was slavery and the Final Solution.

 

[Enron]

Like end up in the foster care system.

They don't have those in poorer countries where recent wars have left a high number of orphans.

 

[Martin]

It's where we disagree. I see a huge difference there between those four and the last part is too much to accept.

We'll have to agree to disagree. Neither of us are gonna convince the other party. It's just a matter of opinion and that's about it.

Do you have any gay friends?

 

[Dostoevsky]

Because you have nothing to support your opinion other than "I don't like them". And that is not a good argument. In fact it's a really poor one.

There are no fact that prove it's fine. It took them 2000 years to come out with something and say "umm we THINK". I think my arguments are too huge only if you consider no babies being born by their side. It's your fault that you ditch it away by using your poor arguments how there are enough people living at this very moment.

I don't even care. If gays want to be gay, fine go be gay. If they want adopt babies they can do that too. A child could do worse than have gay parents.

And why always look at the negative parts? Yeah...child could die. Sure...that's worse...I guess you're right.

 

[Enron]

Do you have any gay friends?

There probably aren't many gays in Serbia.

 

[Dostoevsky]

So was slavery and the Final Solution.

Do you have any gay friends?

Nope.

 

[ßöмßäяðîëя]

I don't care about the trend.

If we've reached a certain number of population world wide that shouldn't mean LET'S STALL THAT and cut down quite a number of new born children.

Why not, China did it, and look at them.

They've become a better in the past 50 years, comparable to the rest of the world as a whole.

Also, that argument would make sense if the gay men you are talking about would break up if they weren't allowed to marry and start reproducing with women.

They are GAY, they aren't going to have natural children regardless if they are married or not.

 

[Dostoevsky]

Why not, China did it, and look at them.

They've become a better in the past 50 years, comparable to the rest of the world as a whole.

Wait wait wait, how did they do it? Stalled population growth?

And it's can't be compared with Economic interest and success. They are doing great because they use some brain.

 

[ßöмßäяðîëя]

It's where we disagree. I see a huge difference there between those four and the last part is too much to accept.

We'll have to agree to disagree. Neither of us are gonna convince the other party. It's just a matter of opinion and that's about it.

Yea, but we've proved, blatantly, that you are wrong.

 

[Martin]

There are no fact that prove it's fine. It took them 2000 years to come out with something and say "umm we THINK". I think my arguments are too huge only if you consider no babies being born by their side. It's your fault that you ditch it away by using your poor arguments how there are enough people living at this very moment.

What on earth are you talking about with this "2000 years" thing? What is it that is supposed to have happened? Who are you talking about that said "we think"?

Whether we give gay people rights to get married and adopt children or we don't, they exist. They have always existed. So what is this threat to our survival exactly? We have survived so far, and it's not like people will start dying if gay people get equal rights. So again, what is the "danger"?

 

[ßöмßäяðîëя]

Wait wait wait, how did they do it? Stalled population growth?

And it's can't be compared with Economic interest and success. They are doing great because they use some brain.

....and stalled population growth.

 

[Enron]

TONY STARKS!!!

 

[ßöмßäяðîëя]

TONY STARKS!!!

I was just yelling that as loud as I could in my house.

 

[Enron]

Wait wait wait, how did they do it? Stalled population growth?

They just started the single child policy, which took emphasis from an agricultural society based on large family size to a more industrial emphasis.

Granted there are a lot of issues with China and their economic success has come with a lot sacrifice.