Greg, check the youtube thread plz 
Some events from your hometown were videotaped.
Some events from your hometown were videotaped.
Man, that dude took some serious drugs...
Buy on AliExpress.com
What Are You Doing Right Now? (179 Viewers)
- Thread starter ßöмßäяðîëя
- Start date
- Tags gay space iliveforfinasteride iliveforjuve is not white loldevil size queens sweet matt is sweet errwhere virgin devil
Hometown nothing. That's the 16th & Mission BART station, which is about two miles up from my house. I call it the "Plasticuffs Station", because at 10pm you will always find a police squad car up on the sidewalk and several people face down in the plaza wearing plasticuffs while they're getting apprehended.
Man, that dude took some serious drugs...
Man, that dude took some serious drugs...
Buy on AliExpress.com
That's pretty close.
And yeah, that was some serious stuff he must've taken
I was kinda impressed with his acrobatics, on the other hand.
And yeah, that was some serious stuff he must've taken
I was kinda impressed with his acrobatics, on the other hand.
http://blog.sfgate.com/crime/2013/06/11/video-emerges-of-naked-man-accosting-riders-at-bart-station/
Now don't act like this phenomenon doesn't exist. People will donate thousands of dollars to aid an injured pet, but an injured black kid without health insurance gets, "Tough luck...that's life in the big city."
A number of people treat animals with more respect and reverence than people. Many often do so out of some self-appointed psychological need to "defend the defenseless," whereas a six-year-old boy -- who ranks as a fellow human and with rights observed by a court system -- can get far less sympathy.
In other words, a lot of people rush to the defense of animals over people because they can personally claim a kind of "lordship" over them, whereas a fellow human being is a potential rival with rival rights and the capacity to hurt them, either physically, financially, or even emotionally. Hence they get much less sympathy, and sympathy is offered more readily to an entity (animals, etc.) that the person feels they can "control" and not feel threatened by.
This is the biggest dirty secret within the animal rights movement that no animal rights group will face up to.
A number of people treat animals with more respect and reverence than people. Many often do so out of some self-appointed psychological need to "defend the defenseless," whereas a six-year-old boy -- who ranks as a fellow human and with rights observed by a court system -- can get far less sympathy.
In other words, a lot of people rush to the defense of animals over people because they can personally claim a kind of "lordship" over them, whereas a fellow human being is a potential rival with rival rights and the capacity to hurt them, either physically, financially, or even emotionally. Hence they get much less sympathy, and sympathy is offered more readily to an entity (animals, etc.) that the person feels they can "control" and not feel threatened by.
This is the biggest dirty secret within the animal rights movement that no animal rights group will face up to.
Never said it justified his idiocy. Just that abuse situations like that can often get far more public sympathy when it's an animal and not a human, which just seems wrong, IMO.
Physical abuses of people happen, and it's called "getting punk'd" and is fair entertainment in some circles. You have the same treatment given to an animal, and a large group of people will freak out of their minds and share it all over the Internet.
Given all the cruelty in the world, I find it odd that the stuff perpetrated on animals is what seems to get shared and highlighted more often.
Physical abuses of people happen, and it's called "getting punk'd" and is fair entertainment in some circles. You have the same treatment given to an animal, and a large group of people will freak out of their minds and share it all over the Internet.
Given all the cruelty in the world, I find it odd that the stuff perpetrated on animals is what seems to get shared and highlighted more often.
it is the asme fallacy as violence against men compared to that against women, women just like animals are perceived as weak and susceptible to abuse and therefore should get more protection and highlight than violence against the traditional perpetrators: men. However, historically, no group has seen as much systematic abuse as men.
I was just thinking this the other day, about that Filipino dog who saved a kid, but lost its snout in the meantime, and people paid something like $27,000 for this dog to be flown to the US for facial reconstructive surgery. What about kids who need medicine, or people needing food, and what if the dog gets hit by a car on its first day back in Manila?
Controvertial, but true. Some good points were made in the courts recently about women on death row sentences: do the jurors have to feel threatened by the person in order to vote for the death penalty? It makes you take pause and think about your motivations.
Here I was worried I was being too much of an irritant lately. 
Totally great example. Which isn't to admonish people who have the heart to help out a dog. But there's some worthy soul-searching here when we show a generosity towards animals that we wouldn't towards our fellow human beings.
Here I was worried I was being too much of an irritant lately. Totally great example. Which isn't to admonish people who have the heart to help out a dog. But there's some worthy soul-searching here when we show a generosity towards animals that we wouldn't towards our fellow human beings.
