Wesley Sneijder - AM LC - Galatasaray (20 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Robee

Senior Member
Jun 21, 2011
7,030
this can only happen at summer i suppose. then we need at least two players. then we want them to be world class ones. looking at availabilities, and our budget again, who would you buy for the wings?
We'd need 2, agree. But with Coman and Berardi almost certainly coming here, we already have 2 options next season. So 1 class act and one backup winger will do. Just sell Pepe and use that funds for it.
 

Buy on AliExpress.com

Akshen

Senior Member
Aug 27, 2010
10,668
I think it is clear by now that Coman is considered by Max as attacker and not trequarista. Sneijder will do good here in my opinion and I will support this transfer if he come for anything below 6m and 3.5m wages max. Im pretty sure he can play for 2-3 more years on highest level and Pirlo will probably leave after next season.
 
Jul 13, 2010
6,792
Then it's better to start preparing for that byt using what we have, using youngsters and/or buying players that will be used for this in the summer. Going for an interim solution by getting Sneijder just to fix the formation for the end of the season is wrong. We will mess with our budget which is small anyway and any sum would affect it, we will have an extra player that we might not use next season; his wages and his age will not help either, wage budget and hard to get rid of.

Everything about the Sneijder move is wrong to be honest and mostly it is dealing with Galatasaray who have repeatedly managed to $#@! Marotta up. History also tells us that Marotta does not learn from his mistakes.
so basically lets play coman as am this season and rewamp our tactics during the summer? we need another coach to play the wings i think
 

Badass J Elkann

It's time to go!!
Feb 12, 2006
69,001
Sell pepe... Funds... :lol:
almost as funny as that "Load of cash" we should be getting from the gabbiadini sale he mentioned earlier in the week.... all 3 mill of it!

- - - Updated - - -

Well, you got it :D, that includes us to stop paying loads of money for backups. A freebie like Coman will do.
so why are you still defending the purchase of Pereyra?
 

Robee

Senior Member
Jun 21, 2011
7,030
so why are you still defending the purchase of Pereyra?
If you actually read what I said, you'd know by now I think it's a misfit, so the transfer is not what we needed and was expensive. BUT the player itself has quality. And whoever denies that, should have an ocular check-up.

You're just getting wound up about everything that doesn't fit your (very narrow) vision.
 

Badass J Elkann

It's time to go!!
Feb 12, 2006
69,001
meanwhile shitty Inter about to finalize deal with Shaqiri
:lol: un fucking believable and inter are meant to be cash strapped and in breach of financial fair play :lol:

- - - Updated - - -

If you actually read what I said, you'd know by now I think it's a misfit, so the transfer is not what we needed and was expensive. BUT the player itself has quality. And whoever denies that, should have an ocular check-up.

You're just getting wound up about everything that doesn't fit your (very narrow) vision.
no i just find it funny that you defend the money allocated for pereyra but you were against the money allocated for Tevez
 

Robee

Senior Member
Jun 21, 2011
7,030
:lol: un $#@!ing believable and inter are meant to be cash strapped and in breach of financial fair play :lol:

- - - Updated - - -



no i just find it funny that you defend the money allocated for pereyra but you were against the money allocated for Tevez
Tevez still has us paying 10m per season 'though and I already told you I now think it's money well spent, but you still insist on the post(s) from about 1,5 years ago that didn't fit your narrow view.

And again you're having trouble actually reading the post or you wouldn't say I'm defending the money towars Pereyra. Is my language too hard to understand for you or are you just stubborn?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 16)