Bu Jsaim was selected to officiate in the semi finals of 98. That means he was one of the best at the time.
Buy on AliExpress.com
[WC] World Cup 2010 - General Talk Thread (72 Viewers)
- Thread starter Tommy
- Start date
Buy on AliExpress.com
Tell you what, let's take that example of yours. Asian refs actually impressed in this wc with both the Japanese and the Uzbek one having better games than that of Europeans heavy weights. Rosetti comes to mind here.
So yes, every ref could fuck up but it doesn't take a genius to figure out that it has nothing to do with the continent they're coming from but rather fitness, awareness and many other factors combined must be taken into account and thankfully they're.
Oh and fuck sake where did that sad face on the title come from
So yes, every ref could fuck up but it doesn't take a genius to figure out that it has nothing to do with the continent they're coming from but rather fitness, awareness and many other factors combined must be taken into account and thankfully they're.
Oh and fuck sake where did that sad face on the title come from
He was given a knockout match in 1994 actually.
Though, he fucked that one up
Anyway back to football analysts. Would you rather have Sachi, Wenger and Aragones or some fluke coach like Blazevic, who if he was good enough would have found a decent job in a good league instead of an Asian league.
Yes. Its like saying a Croatian referee would be corrupt just because he's Croatian .
Though, he fucked that one up
Anyway back to football analysts. Would you rather have Sachi, Wenger and Aragones or some fluke coach like Blazevic, who if he was good enough would have found a decent job in a good league instead of an Asian league.
Yes. Its like saying a Croatian referee would be corrupt just because he's Croatian .
What you're missing is that how the players play really hasn't changed. How the referees officiate really hasn't changed. How the fans at the stadiums watch the matches hasn't really even changed.
The only difference that you're bitching and moaning about is centered exclusively around TV viewers. What the TV viewer sees and experiences has changed dramatically with the advent of pivoting, robotic, multi-angle, slow-motion 3-D cameras that would have required a NASA-like budget decades ago.
While TV revenues are obviously critical for the sport to succeed in a modern society, it really leaves a worse taste in my mouth for the players, referees, and pitch to wind up playing to the cameras instead of to the atmosphere of the actual match in real-life view.
People bitch and moan about the credibility of the sport only because they have the luxury of ridiculous perspectives and the presumption that everything you see on TV in slow motion is more "real" and accurate than anything that happens on the pitch in real time, witnessed by real human beings.
It's for those reasons I think technology isn't so much the solution as the original source of the problem. And to make the game bend over and grab its ankles because we want it to cater to fat, cheese-puff-munching, beer-guzzling, corporate sponsored TV viewers thousands of km from the match would be a net loss for the sport and it's credibility.
Throw on a couple of extra goal line refs if needed for the big money matches. But the rest is pure crap. We may as well have the athletes pack it up and we all watch a televised FIFA 2010 Xbox tournament instead.
Yep. Tuesday for Holland-Uruguay.
Bummer that Paraguay lost. I was hoping to go around town here with the chant, "Two Guays, One Cup!!!!"
The only difference that you're bitching and moaning about is centered exclusively around TV viewers. What the TV viewer sees and experiences has changed dramatically with the advent of pivoting, robotic, multi-angle, slow-motion 3-D cameras that would have required a NASA-like budget decades ago.
While TV revenues are obviously critical for the sport to succeed in a modern society, it really leaves a worse taste in my mouth for the players, referees, and pitch to wind up playing to the cameras instead of to the atmosphere of the actual match in real-life view.
People bitch and moan about the credibility of the sport only because they have the luxury of ridiculous perspectives and the presumption that everything you see on TV in slow motion is more "real" and accurate than anything that happens on the pitch in real time, witnessed by real human beings.
It's for those reasons I think technology isn't so much the solution as the original source of the problem. And to make the game bend over and grab its ankles because we want it to cater to fat, cheese-puff-munching, beer-guzzling, corporate sponsored TV viewers thousands of km from the match would be a net loss for the sport and it's credibility.
Throw on a couple of extra goal line refs if needed for the big money matches. But the rest is pure crap. We may as well have the athletes pack it up and we all watch a televised FIFA 2010 Xbox tournament instead.
Yep. Tuesday for Holland-Uruguay.
Bummer that Paraguay lost. I was hoping to go around town here with the chant, "Two Guays, One Cup!!!!"
No, simply that what he says isn't the word of God. Fred had an opinion and he tried to strengthen it by saying that an ex referee thinks the same too.
And after that it was easy to wind him up
And after that it was easy to wind him up
I didn't have an opinion actually, at least not a strong one. I was unsure about the Villa penalty and i was unsure about Paraguays disallowed goal.
As for the second part...
Tell you what, let's take that example of yours. Asian refs actually impressed in this wc with both the Japanese and the Uzbek one having better games than that of Europeans heavy weights. Rosetti comes to mind here.
So yes, every ref could fuck up but it doesn't take a genius to figure out that it has nothing to do with the continent they're coming from but rather fitness, awareness and many other factors combined must be taken into account and thankfully they're.
Oh and fuck sake where did that sad face on the title come from
So yes, every ref could fuck up but it doesn't take a genius to figure out that it has nothing to do with the continent they're coming from but rather fitness, awareness and many other factors combined must be taken into account and thankfully they're.
Oh and fuck sake where did that sad face on the title come from
Yes exactly, Japanese refs are a bit of a joke as a collective but Nishimura has done very well.Going away from the point here though, talking about the overall credibility of the referee - not his ability - in decision making doesn't add up, because ability dictates that.
Rosetti classed as the world's best but his linesman made a big call wrong and out he went, doesn't mean I wouldn't accept his version of events though.
The Uzbek ref was imo the best so far.
It doesn't necessarily mean that an Italian ref is better than an Uzbek ref, as seen so far in this WC. But the chances are that a ref who comes from Italy and officiates a very important match in serie A and CL ever week, where every call he makes is being observed and discussed, where every wrong decision he makes might cost some teams millions, probably means that he became a great referee and means that he's probably better referee than someone who officiates matches in Montenegro, Syria, Guatemala or Croatia.
But, as said, it doesn't have to be the case.
It doesn't necessarily mean that an Italian ref is better than an Uzbek ref, as seen so far in this WC. But the chances are that a ref who comes from Italy and officiates a very important match in serie A and CL ever week, where every call he makes is being observed and discussed, where every wrong decision he makes might cost some teams millions, probably means that he became a great referee and means that he's probably better referee than someone who officiates matches in Montenegro, Syria, Guatemala or Croatia.
But, as said, it doesn't have to be the case.
Perhaps what you're missing is that a game in 1930 is not played at the same pace as a game in 2010. And even if it was, FUCK your reasoning. It's not even about questionable calls. The England goal wasn't questionable. It wasn't a ridiculous perspective, it wasn't about multi angle cameras and whatever THE FUCK you want to talk about. No, it was utter bullshit. For someone to come out right now and say that he doesn't want technology to be used to me means as much as someone condoning cheating.
He was. Sharif wasn't, especially compared to Fanaei who got to officiate as the linesman in Italy-Brazil world cup final
So, Paraguay goal was wrongly disallowed.
So, Paraguay goal was wrongly disallowed.
How was it wrongly disallowed, what did that Persian say about it?
A player in an offside position is only penalised if, at the moment the ball
touches or is played by one of his team, he is, in the opinion of the referee,
involved in active play by:
• interfering with play or
• interfering with an opponent or
• gaining an advantage by being in that position
Didn't Cardozo interfere with Busquets?