UAPs (16 Viewers)

OP
U Picciriddu

U Picciriddu

MDCCCXCVII
Thread Starter #229
Jun 16, 2020
12,435
  • Thread Starter
    • Thread Starter #229
    A new whistleblower will come forward this weekend, this time it seems that it is a first hand witness. Same modus operandi as David Grusch who did a interview with Ross Coulthart aswel.

     
    OP
    U Picciriddu

    U Picciriddu

    MDCCCXCVII
    Thread Starter #234
    Jun 16, 2020
    12,435
  • Thread Starter
    • Thread Starter #234
    I think that we're going towards disclosure.

    After brining NextGen I defeated woke and brought you guys aliens. Still not a moderator. Over 30 years a new generation of Tuzzers will read this post and they'll talk how the moderators did me dirty.

     
    OP
    U Picciriddu

    U Picciriddu

    MDCCCXCVII
    Thread Starter #236
    Jun 16, 2020
    12,435
  • Thread Starter
    • Thread Starter #236
    campionesidd said:
    Still waiting for actual evidence.
    Eyewitness testimony means absolutely nada. I can make up basically anything I want. Doesn’t make it true.
    Click to expand...
    So there are arguments for- and against your statement. Firstly of course I agree that extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, that should be the standard for this phenomenon.

    Secondly (this part has multiple facets), is the credible people who are speaking out, the classified documents and the DOPSR approvals they got. If it were average citizens with these claims I personally wouldn’t care, but for now I try to understand that many will have their hands tied by non disclosure agreements, or that they don’t want to violate the secrecy of classified documents. The military people, scientists and politicians really bring weight to the discussion and make it worth following.

    Compare the situation now to 10 years ago for example, than imagine what the discussion might be over the next years. It’s rational to remain critical, but we’re also passed the point of dismissing everything if you ask me.
     
    OP
    U Picciriddu

    U Picciriddu

    MDCCCXCVII
    Thread Starter #237
    Jun 16, 2020
    12,435
  • Thread Starter
    • Thread Starter #237
    Funny experiment. I asked Grok and ChatGPT months ago when disclosure could happen and both gave me a timetable of ~20/25 years. Now Grok says 2025 and ChatGPT 2026/2030

    Grok (the answer is longer but annoying to copy/paste):
    Based on the available information, trends, and sentiments expressed in both legislative actions and public discourse, here's an assessment of when disclosure regarding UAPs (Unidentified Aerial Phenomena) might occur:

    When Disclosure Might Happen:
    2025: This year is frequently cited in discussions and predictions by insiders, researchers, and some public figures for several reasons:

    Legislative Developments: The National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year 2024 includes provisions for the establishment of a UAP Records Collection at NARA, with deadlines for agencies to submit records by September 30, 2025. This could lead to a form of disclosure as records are declassified and made public.
    Whistleblower Testimonies: Individuals like David Grusch have come forward with claims about UAP programs, suggesting that there's mounting pressure for transparency.

    Public and Congressional Interest: There's been a significant increase in public interest, media coverage, and congressional hearings on UAPs, pushing for more transparency.

    Posts on X: Several posts from figures like Jake Barber and Dr. Steven Greer on X suggest that disclosure might happen in 2025, although these are speculative in nature.
    Click to expand...
    ChatGPT:
    I think significant UAP disclosure could happen between 2026 and 2030, but it depends on political, scientific, and societal factors. Here's why:

    1. Government Initiatives and Political Pressure

    The UAP Disclosure Act of 2023 mandated declassification of UAP-related documents, similar to the JFK Records Act. This could lead to incremental releases over the next few years.

    Bipartisan pressure in the U.S. government, with figures like Sen. Chuck Schumer and Rep. Tim Burchett pushing for more transparency.

    The All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) has been tasked with investigating UAPs, and their reports could eventually reveal more.


    2. Whistleblowers and Leaks

    David Grusch's claims (2023) about a secret crash retrieval program and non-human intelligence suggest disclosure may come through whistleblowers before official acknowledgment.

    If more insiders come forward with credible evidence, it may force the government’s hand.


    3. Military and Scientific Acknowledgment

    The Pentagon's 2021 and 2023 UAP reports confirmed that many sightings remain unexplained and exhibit advanced capabilities.

    NASA and other agencies are openly investigating UAPs, which is a major shift from past denial.

    Scientists like Dr. Avi Loeb (Galileo Project) are actively searching for physical evidence, which could lead to breakthroughs.


    4. Public Readiness and Controlled Disclosure

    Governments might be preparing the public for gradual disclosure to avoid panic or disruption.

    The media and entertainment industry (e.g., increased UAP coverage in mainstream news and Hollywood films) might be subtly shaping public perception.


    5. International Cooperation and External Pressures

    If another country (e.g., China or Russia) reveals information first, the U.S. might be forced to respond.

    Organizations like the United Nations have shown renewed interest in discussing UAPs.


    Conclusion

    While full disclosure (e.g., revealing alien contact or reverse-engineered technology) may still be far off, I expect incremental revelations over the next 5-10 years. Whether this leads to definitive proof of non-human intelligence remains uncertain, but the increasing pressure and momentum suggest we’re moving toward greater transparency.

    What do you think? Will disclosure happen suddenly or in a slow, controlled manner?
    Click to expand...
     
    You must log in or register to reply here.

    Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 14)