U.S. Soccer (11 Viewers)

Bjerknes

"Top Economist"
Mar 16, 2004
117,549
Whomever wrote this is a fucking moron.

"The one thing that the Americans lack is a recognizable, and definite style of play. For stretches, it was unclear what the Americans were trying to do. Were they playing a possession game? A counter-attacking style? Were they trying to draw the Italians in or just playing kick and chase and hoping for the best."

Uhhh, perhaps that's because we were down a man for close to an hour? What do you want us to do, keep playing the same way after the red card?

Jamie Trecker, from the Windy City. At least you got one thing right -- the true meaning of your town's nickname!
 

Bjerknes

"Top Economist"
Mar 16, 2004
117,549
Howard - He did well for the most part, but maybe could have done a little better on the De Rossi shot. 6.5

Spector - Did an OK job for the most part, but got skinned a couple times by the Italiens. Perhaps Heydude would have made better tackles. 6

Jay - Thought he did well, although should have done better on the second Rossi goal. I think he did a better job than Bocanegra would do. 6

Onyewu - Beastly back there, very solid in all aspects of the game. Unfortunately those in front of him let him down. 7

Bornstein - Did fairly well against Camoranesi and don't even bring Beasley into this discussion. 6

Bradley - OK but he needs to get stuck in more in midfield. I don't care if Clark was out for the second -- he needs to stop the long shots that killed us. 5.5

Clark - Maybe he should have controlled the tackle more, but it still wasn't red. 5.5

Feilhaber - Good first half, horrible second. Gave the ball away for the first Rossi goal. Not convincing enough. 5.5

Dempsey - Still needs to get involved more. Missed a great chance. 5.5

Donovan - Did well to get involved and made some slick runs, plus should have won us a penalty. Really troubled Legro and Chiellini. 7.5

Altidore - Great move on Chiellini and did some other good things with the ball up top. In the second he was left stranded though. 7

Beasley - Who? Meh

Kljestan - One good shot and that was it. NA

Davies - No help. NA

Team defense - Good for the most part. 7

Team midfield - Didn't win the midfield battle in the second half. 5

Team attack - Very poor finishing but at least troubled the Azzurri. 6
 

Bjerknes

"Top Economist"
Mar 16, 2004
117,549
Team with ratings.

Howard (8.5)

Spector (7) - Demerit (7.5) - Onyewu (8) - Bocanegra (6.5)

Dempsey (7.5) - Bradley (7) - Clark (6.5) - Donovan (7)

Altidore (8) - Davies (7)


Overall the entire team was amazing, no qualms here, but next time we need to hold the ball more and not give possession away to teams like Spain so frequently. But the backline was fantastic, perhaps the best I've ever seen one of our back fours play.
 
Jul 10, 2006
6,760
I'm watching the replay and I just can't believe Spain couldn't get one of those shots to go down in the second half. from 45-70 mins they seemed to be constantly around the US goal, flinging shots from everywhere.

Great effort by the d-line and Howard has been on top of his game.
 

Bjerknes

"Top Economist"
Mar 16, 2004
117,549
What sort of bullshit squad is that? Where is Torres, Orozco, and other more high profile players? Players like Arnaud and Pause have no future with this team, so why bring them?

Adu better start every fucking game. And jeez, what a WEAK midfield.

Perkins

Cherundolo - Conrad - Parkhurst - Pearce

Cronin - Holden - Rogers

Adu

Cooper - Davies
 
OP
Enron

Enron

Tickle Me
Moderator
Oct 11, 2005
75,733
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #1,110
    I think Robles will get the start in GK.

    That back line is fine. The midfield is gonna suck and the forwards should be fun to watch. It's nice to see Cooper finally called up.

    Bradley is resting the better players because on Aug 8 we play the Mexicans at Azteca.
     

    Bjerknes

    "Top Economist"
    Mar 16, 2004
    117,549
    I suppose all sports writers need to make a name for themselves somewhere. Sure, we may have screwed up the final, and maybe a lot of faggot-ass, sorry-ass sports writers who love sucking baseball dick were "suckered" into paying attention to our own national team (oh how horrible), but at least we have made some progress.


    Fast forward to now, and here we go again.

    When America beat Spain, the top-ranked country in the world, in the Confederations Cup last week, we were again lectured about watershed moments and forecasts of increasing U.S. interest. "This win is huge for American soccer," said U.S. player Clint Dempsey.

    Then the U.S. lost 3-2 to Brazil on Sunday, after taking a 2-0 lead. Typical U.S. soccer. The Spanish win was a set-up. Another tease, followed by another spate of predictions on the upcoming American soccer emergence, followed by another letdown. It's the old U.S. soccer mamba.

    How many times have Americans heard the soccer-will-transform-us mantra before? The site Deadspin.com compiled an interesting list.

    In the 1994 World Cup the U.S. beat Columbia 2-1. "This game is going to have a permanent effect" on soccer in America, said Alan Rothenberg, president of the United States Soccer Federation. "It's the biggest so far in history."

    The permanent effect wasn't so perfect.

    The U.S. beat heavily favored Argentina in 1995 in the Copa America tournament. "I think this is the first step ... to become a major soccer power," said one of the U.S. players, Cobi Jones.

    If by soccer power he meant minor world player, that was accurate.

    The U.S. team beat Brazil in the 1998 Gold Cup, and the U.S. coach, Steve Sampson, was in full peacock mode. "[The win] states we can play with anyone in the world, and on occasion, beat the best in the world,” he said then.

    Not in the World Cup, we can't.

    In 2002 the U.S. beat Portugal in the World Cup 3-2. One MLS official at the time said it was the beginning of the emergence of that league.

    What the U.S. does is get a handful of wins every decade or so -- or some faded star like Beckham uses our country -- and our wishful-thinking genetics kick in. I've been just as guilty of this as anyone.

    It's typical American arrogance, however, to think that we can compete in a sport that, in many parts of the world, kids start playing in the womb.

    If German athletes started crowing about how that country could put together an NFL team and then take on the Pittsburgh Steelers, we'd laugh.

    The Great Soccer Con fooled me once before.

    Feel free to be suckered again. I've learned my lesson.
    http://www.cbssports.com/soccer/story/11903198

    Mike Freeman, do us a favor and follow your buddy Jacko into the ground.
     

    Bjerknes

    "Top Economist"
    Mar 16, 2004
    117,549
    I don't understand how people can seriously get paid for this stuff. Anybody can conjure up some weak article about how they're waiting for us to win the World Cup while not giving praise where it is due, so why can't I write for CBS Sports?

    I can write a fantastic article about how CBS is filled with cocksuckers who love College Basketball and skew media reports like they did in the Ahmedinijhad interview in 60 Minutes.

    These sort of people really ruin the game for us. The fringe freaks who love sports media will fawn over crap articles like this.
     

    KB824

    Senior Member
    Sep 16, 2003
    31,789
    What sort of bullshit squad is that? Where is Torres, Orozco, and other more high profile players? Players like Arnaud and Pause have no future with this team, so why bring them?

    Adu better start every fucking game. And jeez, what a WEAK midfield.

    Perkins

    Cherundolo - Conrad - Parkhurst - Pearce

    Cronin - Holden - Rogers

    Adu

    Cooper - Davies

    They said that they were fielding a "B" team for the Gold Cup.

    Doesn't surprise me in the least.
     

    Bjerknes

    "Top Economist"
    Mar 16, 2004
    117,549
    Nothing wrong with what he said at all. I've gained more respect for Donovan over the past week than ever before, really. I'm glad to see him speak out against this piece of shit player, so well done.

    I hope people boo him so much he leaves the league. He's nothing short of a mercenary and disgusting human being. The world will be better off without him, especially the MLS.
     

    Red

    -------
    Moderator
    Nov 26, 2006
    47,023
    I don't disagree with what he says.

    Folk have to justify their salary, and Beckham is no different in that regard.


    It really would amuse me if Americans turned against Beckham.
     

    pitbull

    Senior Member
    Jul 26, 2007
    11,045
    The funny thing being that probably Beckham himself is more popular and recognized than the whole league he is playing in, not talking about the club. For example, for me the situation is like "wow, Eto'o screwed Kurucvhi? Well, whatever, I don't give a shit".
     

    Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 9)