Why not? Seems ridiculous that you can't compare managers the same way we compare sporting directors or past players. There is a weird attitude with Allegri on here where people jump on top of any post that mentions him.
Also seems ridiculous that we can't critique our new manager and whether we want to mention him or not, Allegri is the predecessor and last season will be the benchmark for Motta. Same way as Sarri/Pirlo, Pirlo/Allegri in their first seasons etc.
It is 100% too early to make sweeping judgements about Motta. But that doesn't mean he can't get criticism and you can't talk about the results or decisions he makes. This isn't Bologna where he will almost get a free pass on his first season. He's implemented a lot very quickly (a lot of it very positive) and deserves credit for that. But as time goes on the results need to improve or the criticism will build and become more valid.
It is ridiculous because you are comparing based on hypothetical situations. 'If Allegri had the same squad, we'd have more points right now'.
Last season being the benchmark for Motta will only make sense if we finish the season to make an accurate judgement. At the end of the day, where we finish in the league table is what matters most. With Motta, hopefully we can achieve some sort of continuity with our football which we lacked under Allegri.
You can definitely be critical of the coach and I'm in agreement with you especially with his selections or the fact that we are cut open so easily but bringing up hypothetical scenarios to how Allegri would've done in the same situation is not relevant and makes zero sense.
The weird attitude is from Allegri's fans who can't keep his name out of their mouths and are very clearly struggling to move on from him.
Motta doesn't get a free pass but as long as he makes top 4, it will still be considered an acceptable first season. Bremer injury killed our hopes of any possible silverware or title aspirations this season.