People are saying "Gallas? Sure, why not; if he's free let's just add him and put him on the bench."
Gallas is likely to seek a heavy wage (let's assume 4M/year) and a signing fee (that should be manageable, let's discard that).
So, on the assumption that he signs a two-year contract for 4M/year, that will cost us 8M, plus taxes. It's almost a given that he'll leave for free / retire at the end of that period.
Instead of investing 8M in Gallas, we could look for a younger defender, worth 8M, who would earn 2M/year and sign a 4-year deal.
After two years (for the sake of comparison with a Gallas deal), we will have paid 12M.
The difference is that after two years, Gallas is worth 0 EUR (net investment = 8 M), while our young and talented defender may be worth between 6M and 18M (net investment = between 6 and -6M)
Simply put, my point is that Gallas on the bench is not "free"
Actually I heard Gallas would earn 2M a season so its 4M
a good younger defender worth 8M is quite hard to fine as it usually starts around 12M
Lets say we do get a player worth 8M and give him a contract worth 2M a season
the differece is 8M
You are right Gallas will go for free but he will give us contribution
A young defender might be sold later in his career and could stay
if he stays and retires here we get nothing for him
If we sell him than it depends on the price we sell him for
What I`m trying to say in the short run it is better for us to look at cheaper solutions and try to strengthen the side as much as possible
In the long run investing in younger players is the more profitable and more affordable
As for this year I hope we get a great CB don`t care if he is free or not because we desperately need it
Gallas could be a backup as I`m not sure about him as a starter
As a backup I would rather we sign him and not some other player since we need to invest our cash in the way that will get us the best team possible and it will make us have more $ for other positions
As for the NBA FINALS GO LAKERS