Martin, in his usual heavy handed, but effective manner, put to death the previously political debate over Nike slave labour.
So, with all intent to keep to simple sporting terms I am writing a response:
Nike and Juve have a very lucrative business contract, and nothing any fan says will change that. The deal is all about the money, especially for Juve. If it wasn't about the money then they'd produce the jersey themselves. It's not as if there aren't textile manufacturers in Italy...Nevertheless, we as fans must realize that in an increasely competitive footballing market, the money is important. Juve don't have the luxury of a marketing scheme as fool proof as Real's or a billionare benefactor like Chelsea. Juve need all the money they can get to compete. That's why Juve take deals with Nike and that's why Juve associates with Kaddafi and his son.
So, whether you like nike or not, keep that out of the discussion. What we should really be talking about is why the footballing industry has backed itself into such a corner as to rely upon jersey manufacturers for economic support. Does this not suggest a serious issue of neglect in terms of market management in football?
We can all agree that the Nike kits have black and white verticle stripes and that's what really counts. What else counts is that Nike is paying Juve. If you don't like the fact that Juventus and every other team in professional football relies upon donations from wealthy multinational corporations, then that is the true issue.
Hopefully, I've opened a new direction without crossing any boundaries...
So, with all intent to keep to simple sporting terms I am writing a response:
Nike and Juve have a very lucrative business contract, and nothing any fan says will change that. The deal is all about the money, especially for Juve. If it wasn't about the money then they'd produce the jersey themselves. It's not as if there aren't textile manufacturers in Italy...Nevertheless, we as fans must realize that in an increasely competitive footballing market, the money is important. Juve don't have the luxury of a marketing scheme as fool proof as Real's or a billionare benefactor like Chelsea. Juve need all the money they can get to compete. That's why Juve take deals with Nike and that's why Juve associates with Kaddafi and his son.
So, whether you like nike or not, keep that out of the discussion. What we should really be talking about is why the footballing industry has backed itself into such a corner as to rely upon jersey manufacturers for economic support. Does this not suggest a serious issue of neglect in terms of market management in football?
We can all agree that the Nike kits have black and white verticle stripes and that's what really counts. What else counts is that Nike is paying Juve. If you don't like the fact that Juventus and every other team in professional football relies upon donations from wealthy multinational corporations, then that is the true issue.
Hopefully, I've opened a new direction without crossing any boundaries...
