The Official Mod Thread (1 Viewer)
- Thread starter Alen
- Start date
And if we defend Seven we're labeled Seven lovers or Seven's puppies. Not that it would be any different if one of then (and quite a few of these guys tend to loose their head fairly easily) were on the proverbial choppy block. I'd like to think that we would do the same for them in a similar situation and vice versa, but their actions make me think otherwise.
They don't really understand faith, that's why they're aggressive toward those with who oppose their viewpoints. They want people to respect their views on religion, but if we question it they tell us it's too complex or label the questioning party an "anti".
-Seen a man standin' over a dead dog lyin' by the highway in a ditch
He's lookin' down kinda puzzled pokin' that dog with a stick
Got his car door flung open he's standin' out on highway 31
Like if he stood there long enough that dog'd get up and run
Struck me kinda funny seem kinda funny sir to me
Still at the end of every hard day people find some reason to believe
They don't really understand faith, that's why they're aggressive toward those with who oppose their viewpoints. They want people to respect their views on religion, but if we question it they tell us it's too complex or label the questioning party an "anti".
-Seen a man standin' over a dead dog lyin' by the highway in a ditch
He's lookin' down kinda puzzled pokin' that dog with a stick
Got his car door flung open he's standin' out on highway 31
Like if he stood there long enough that dog'd get up and run
Struck me kinda funny seem kinda funny sir to me
Still at the end of every hard day people find some reason to believe
Professional deformation.
I caught myself having a hard time trying not to be biased at all when I write about something I care about....country, football club etc or something I hate (Milan).
History students, everywhere, are thought how important the position of the writer, origin, timing etc of the historical source are.
Naturally, you can't dismiss the opinion of a supposedly biased person but you need to take it with a pinch of salt and you can dismiss it only when you have other sources for comparison and proof that the person who wrote the source was indeed biased about this, that or everything he said.
Though I don't need to know the nationality or the religion of the people when I debate with them about 99.9% of the things.
I caught myself having a hard time trying not to be biased at all when I write about something I care about....country, football club etc or something I hate (Milan).
History students, everywhere, are thought how important the position of the writer, origin, timing etc of the historical source are.
Naturally, you can't dismiss the opinion of a supposedly biased person but you need to take it with a pinch of salt and you can dismiss it only when you have other sources for comparison and proof that the person who wrote the source was indeed biased about this, that or everything he said.
Though I don't need to know the nationality or the religion of the people when I debate with them about 99.9% of the things.
