Ok.
But Hoori made a good point in the other thread and I think she deserves a reply.
Burke keeps making fun of Muslims, Juve, Religion, keeps provoking on purpose all the fucking time, creates double accounts, doesn't even care about Juve, but we accepted him as such, most of us love him the way he is and we don't even want him to change, but he's not getting banned while Seven makes fun of Muslims and religion, keeps provoking on purpose (and gets provoked, unlike Burke), creates double accounts, CARES about Juve and gets his info from here, but we aks him to change and he gets a permanent ban.
I think Hoori deserves an explanation from the mod team why is one of them a moderator and the other one is permanently banned?
It's easy Swag. I am reasonable, Hoori is reasonable. If you give us a good explanation, we'll be smart enough not to mention it anymore.
Unfortunately I didn't see Hoori's post. But you've given me a pretty good summary here I can go with.
Burke isn't above banning. His history has proven that. The strange irony here is perhaps that Burke has become a better member when he became a moderator. (I was really dicey on the idea, Bozi heavily supported it, and to be honest, I think Burke has been a lot more fair and unbiased than I ever would have given him credit for.)
Burke does what he does for outrageousness and laughs, for the most part. Not everyone sees the humor, of course. But while you cannot avoid offending everyone, life is absurd enough and I would concur there are times where humor is appropriate. Even at my own expense.
But others do what they do to provoke insult and belittle the other person's belief systems and culture almost out of an air of superiority and self-smugness. That's less about trying to earn laughs as much as inflict pain. Sure, we're dealing with some very fuzzy borders here, and my interpretation is far from flawless. But that's a bit of how I genuinely see it, since you sort of reasonably asked.
I think many of you don't realize that Seven was under a permanent ban a long time ago, and I was the one mod who eventually had a change of heart and lobbied to have him return to the forums. I did that once, convinced he was making an honest effort to be less destructive. It lasted for a while, but his habits returned heavily after several months.
Having been through all that once before, it shouldn't come as a surprise as I'm not willing to be one to be the first to go to bat for him again. Not so much that I felt betrayed by him (that doesn't really matter in the end), but rather because I know exactly what will happen again. The forums will self-centeredly become about
him. These forums should be about nobody in particular, and I even hate the thought of answering you in this thread because once again we are making the forums about some single member -- and that's just wrong.
The truth is, if I take a step back, these forums have operated with a lot more health, vitality, and less negativity/antagonism while he's been out. Seven got more than his fair share of provocation, of course. There are a lot of other guilty parties as well. But funny how that hasn't been much of an issue at all since Seven's been away. There's something to that, and I will vote for the good of the forums over the good of any one poster every time.
You can say "fuck Ciro" now. I can say it too.
Yep. That was me who carded you on that I know. But you have to understand context. Here you're just toying. When I carded you, you were inciting a bit of the ol' hatred. There's a difference.
The other difference is that I decided to clamp down because it was getting out of control. We're human. We cannot be perfectly fair and balanced, consistent, and be everywhere at all times. So that's a little of why things come out that way.