But how does all this makes sense for you?
We spent more than 50m eur on transfers, what more could have Ferrara asked from the directors anyway?
Was some other coach going to ask for more than Diego, Melo, Grosso, Caceres and Cannavaro?
Mourinho asked for more players but Moratti told him that that's it. Mourinho publicly stated that Inter can not compete for the CL with this team and Moratti told him that he has to work with what he has.
Is Mourinho a pawn?
Why would our directors spend more than 50m on player A or player B instead of a player C and player D that the coach will ask for if we're gonna spend the same money?
What orders could the directors give to him? Will they tell him which formation to play or which players to use?
I really don't understand this.
I see our capacity and will to spend as a different issue, from the choice of the coach!
But the choice of when, to whom and how much to spend on some player, both now and in the future are totally relevant!
Many managers would demand a word on that and we have reasons to deny,
that right, enough reasons to sacrifice the services of a proper coach.
I have a few ideas about those reasons, but the thing that i am certain of, is that there are such reason and the do play an important role in our high decision making! Ciro, would not only be a tool now, but also in the future.
And besides that, the need someone to step up and claim responsibility, if those decision fail.
Most def our board values men like Secco, more than any coach we might get.
In order to protect men like Secco, his incompetence and inefficiency, someone else has to take the blame, for the choices made and their end result...
Thats exactly why we need a tool!
There are reasons for that. In the end, it's probably gonna be proven a mistake by the board, but I think they had their reasons.
Bringing a quality and famous manager was gonna mean NO Felipe Melo. Our budget is still limited and in order to bring Melo we even took money from next year's budget. Buying an expensive coach, paying for his wages (with taxes added) was gonna cost us almost the same as buying Felipe Melo, and we weren't gonna buy him.
But we did want to bring a more experienced manager. If you remember, Ferrara was the third choice and the first option was Spalletti. After trying to get him and after he rejected us (he probably regrets that decision now) we decided to keep Ferrara and spend the money on a quality player.
When Spalletti rejected us and we (probably) couldn't get another quality coach, we decided that we should at least make the team stronger with the money we had at our disposal.
We didn't get Ferrara because he's a pawn. We got him after we failed to get a quality coach and we decided to at least buy a good player.
It's a mistake that we didn't succeed in bringing a quality coach, but in no way our directors planned to get Ferrara only because he's a pawn.
The salary of the staff is supposed to be a different budget and IMO, absolutely not at comparable with the amount we spent on Melo!
If we had competent managers on the transfer department, we wouldnt even have to overpay that much, or make up for those additional sales, with the sales of Almiton Palla, Zala, Tiaga etc...
The faulty strategical decisions we made so far already cost us more money than Mourinho's salary! Even from this perspective, our entire managing was faulty!
As for Spaletti, Lippi and co, IMO, we never really intended to bring such a coach, because imo the intentions of our board were very clear from the beginning, were other ppl found excuses, i found reasoning behind those moves.
All those excuses are shot down one by one, during the years, our problem wasnt financial, neither prestige, competitiveness or any other invented excuse,
it has to do with the power and influence of our helm.
This has been the only constant in all situation we have been so far and every coaching choice we made abides to this.
Thats why i was certain that we are not going to replace CR with a proper choice and opposed to CR's naming.
The intention was IMO evident and all the rest just happened for internal consuming. We never really intended to bring a proper choice, because that wouldnt serve their interests. And their interests are above our needs.
There is of course soms substance to the claim that new players take time to settle into a squad, especially when the system in place is new to the WHOLE squad...And also injuries to key players has made matters worse, but still...with the players available to Ciro, he has failed horribly to instill any apparent sense of spirit or pride in merely wearing the bianconeri jersey. and THAT is one of the most important jobs for a manager. It is also the ONE thing I assumed Ciro would impress onto, into, our team. Obviously his tactical inexperience was always going to prove risky, though he has surpassed my own concerns, tenfold, by insane selection policies which make it HARDER for us to win game, or even draw.
Thats a great issue and all the teams suffer from that more or less.
Even if we upgrade to a better coach, we will suffer a bit from the transition.
There are many many reasons for that and the only moment it cant be noticed, is what we hit the bottom (just like it happened with CR)
I look at the management at Gillingham. My british team...admittedly far less glamourous than Juve, but still...a good place for comparison. After years of depression and erosion, they brought in a manager experienced and succesful from the lower leagues in england. At first, we went down, too much dead wood, but then we came straight back up, as Stimson (the manager) was able to rip away the dead wood, and bring in players who really wanted to play for the club, for him, and for each other...Its always pleasing as a supporter to sense that the players respect and believe in their manager, at whatever level. He transfers his will and determination to the players, and if he doesn't see it, he doesn't blame the referee. he blames the players, and himself if he sees fit. We don't see this at Juve...instead...a series of comments by players expressing concern that our coach needs to coach better. These comments are from star players, not those on the fringes of the first team...
In a period of transition, which we are most definitely traveling through presently, with the Old getting older, the youth coming through and an influx of talented 20 somethings, a manager is needed who first and foremost, can spur the troops into action, make them proud and spirited to be part of the club. he also must be capable of accepting the lunacy of playing an unfit lightweight out of position in a crunch game for us (DP v bordeaux).
One of the reasons we are underperforming is the lack of aspiring leaders,
our sergeant on the field (DP), Captain on the bench (Ferrara) and General from the stands (Gigli, Blanc) were far from aspiring.
We need guidance, as we are trying to find our new self, the effects of calciopoli are fading away, the champions of the old guard are no longer part of our team, our history and prestige havent recovered yet.
Thats exactly the kind of damage were aiming for when they destroyed us
and thats exactly why i claimed that we wont win nothing in the next decade if that wont change.
Unfortunately, all goes as planned from our enemies...
We have technically a better squad than everyone bar Inter. Who have a stronger squad and also a far more talented manager, and despite his typically portuguese arrogance, he does demand and receive respect from his players. I saw it at chelsea, and i see it at Inter. people want to play for him.
Who wants to play for Ciro????
Its feeling exactly as it did towards the end of last season when Ranieri was dead in the water...and my thoughts of what must be done are the same.
Well technically, we were second to Milan alone in the tables and now, that Milan is ahead of us, its because of our current forms and the least difference of quality. However we are Juventus and we were supposed to do better.
But in order to do better, we need to be competitive at every line, both on the field and off. In many ways, there are left a lot to be desired and for that reason, we were meant to under-perform, let alone be optimal.
Buying a group of players wont make us the TEAM, we used to be...
There were many reasons we used to be that team and they are absent today...
Gasperini would be perfect. Hiddink obviously the ideal candidate, and he does like a challenge, where he sees potential, but players failing to show what they are truly capable of...it might get him! worth a roll of the dice, if not, lets grab Gasperini, and Criscito can come with him. they can keep Palladino though.
For us the fans maybe, but our board has a different opinion, someone who can be easily manipulated would be a better fit.
Someone young and inexperienced, (Conte, Zenga) bound to make mistakes and become the easy scapegoat in the end is what they need and what we will get... Maybe we can find a compromise between that and someone who may actually offer smth more though.
But again, thats exactly what i was waiting us to find this summer, when we had the PERFECT opportunity to do so, but we didnt even try, what makes you think that things have changed now?