i didnt see his post, he got the infraction, also you, zoso, lion, b_aus, and zach are on 0 tolerance because of your history with the marotta shit, so like i said consider that your last warning, start any more gang wars and get straight banned
for at least making it look like the same set of rules apply for everyone.
The bold part is where the dispute arises and I'm really interested to know if owner of the site @Marty (if it's him?) approves straight ban only for selected members. The main issue is that this system can easily be manipulated, when in the wrong hands and rather uncertain how I made that list or other folks on it. Or how long will this
probation period last? Yeah, we quarreled at times, but there will always be fights, feuds, quarrels, trolling around here and I checked occasionally general pulse of this place when on vacay; unsurprisingly it seems the same issues persisted, with different protagonists. Don't think you'll be able to eradicate this, but might make the place dull. Being a football forum, some sort of bantering will always be present, in one way or the other, eventhough insults should get sanctioned and there are infraction points that have been serving its purpose, since in a heat of the moment people can say ridiculous things and warnings/ infractions served exactly for the purpose of members to cool down. At least that's the way I understood it. Dynamics of the place seemed to encourage this particular behavior (bantering, trolling), but there is a thin line and it can be pretty vague at times what can get you banned. Now couple of us are even denied of this basic privilege. Calling someone a nerd or bastard can have a different context. Once I posted
and got thread banned. Well...really weird place at times. That's it I guess. End of rant.