The Mod Thread ("because for some reason,you think we actually care") (27 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Fred

Senior Member
Oct 2, 2003
41,113
Did you just say that I lied? Did you call me a liar?

OMG, stop offending me.
In my religion, that no-one else who doesn't believe in it gives a fuck about it, picturing my God (the invisible friend- PBUH) and calling someone a liar is something we kill people for.
I'm offended. You're repeatedly offending me.
Mods, where is justice here? Why can I be offended and some members can't be offended by Seven?
How do i know you aren't lying about your new religion too. You see after your last few posts, i am automatically assuming that you are lying every time.

I'd stop offending you if i actually believed you. But you're a proven liar, so i don;t believe you i am sorry.
 

Buy on AliExpress.com

Bjerknes

"Top Economist"
Mar 16, 2004
116,112
He never meant it, but i am sure if you guys persist on misunderstanding him and still feel offended by his post, i am sure he wouldn't mind apologizing.

Come on Andy, you know Tahir. He isn't the type of guy he's being made out to be in the past few pages.
I know Tahir sometimes goes overboard when it comes to discussing Seven, and also in the defense of topics regarding Islam. But my opinion does not matter -- it was Dusan who was offended by it, as he should be, and I stand by him.
 

Osman

Koul Khara!
Aug 30, 2002
61,500
You are all bunch of bitches, I really cant stress that enough.

Going emo for how many pages now? And for what? Over an obbsessive, and overaggressive narcissist who craves to be right (not about the topic, but more this in every debate and thread derailed to ad infinitum), who I thought better of before (and in several topics, even agreed with, or despite heavily disagreeing, understood), despite his out of control need to feed his ego.

But after he now showed himself to be nothing but a sad case by keep signing up several times DAILY, its just too pathetic. Nothing different from pathetic trolls I ban daily in another forum, the same god damn loser M.O. Didnt think he would stoop this low regardless, seriously, wtf, gives? Unjust ban or not, fucking pathetic.


P.S Ze, det där var verkligen för lågt, oavsett hur du mena det, spelar ingen roll, borde be om ursäkt med tanke på hur han tog det, och det va för mycket oavsett. Bry dig inte om vad andra säger, men att det var förlämpande för honom, speciellt med tanke på du inte mena det.
 

Fred

Senior Member
Oct 2, 2003
41,113
I know Tahir sometimes goes overboard when it comes to discussing Seven, and also in the defense of topics regarding Islam. But my opinion does not matter -- it was Dusan who was offended by it, as he should be, and I stand by him.
Well then by the same logic, Seven has offended Arabs and Muslims on a constant basis. So how come you are so against his banning?
 

Byrone

Peen Meister
Dec 19, 2005
30,778
But i'm offended by Fred's avatar and he's repeatedly offending me whenever he posts something because his avatar is there.
I don't know, probably more people are offended by it.

So what now?

I don't question Seven's ban Byrone, I question the length of it. He should be unbanned.
Do you have imaginary friends & relatives? How does it offend you?

That's not for any of us to decide.If i think of the constant work the mods have to do in order to watch over seven,i understand the reasoning behind it.


Has he though? He has not yet.
Not that i'm aware of,i'm certainly not gonna go through ten pages to find out.But if he hasn't i'm pretty sure he would but i just don't see how some can't see what he was trying to point out.
 

Suns

Release clause?
May 22, 2009
22,086
You are all bunch of bitches, I really cant stress that enough.

Going emo for how many pages now? And for what? Over an obbsessive, and overaggressive narcissist who craves to be right (not about the topic, but more this in every debate and thread derailed to ad infinitum), who I thought better of before (and in several topics, even agreed with, or despite heavily disagreeing, understood), despite his out of control need to feed his ego.

But after he now showed himself to be nothing but a sad case by keep signing up several times DAILY, its just too pathetic. Nothing different from pathetic trolls I ban daily in another forum, the same god damn loser M.O. Didnt think he would stoop this low regardless, seriously, wtf, gives? Unjust ban or not, fucking pathetic.


P.S Ze, det där var verkligen för lågt, oavsett hur du mena det, spelar ingen roll, borde be om ursäkt med tanke på hur han tog det, och det va för mycket oavsett. Bry dig inte om vad andra säger, men att det var förlämpande för honom, speciellt med tanke på du inte mena det.
Men var det verkligen det? Han menade ju inte allvar med det han sa och han kunde lika gärna kunna sagt svensk, finsk, irländare eller chilenare för att visa sin poäng.
 

Osman

Koul Khara!
Aug 30, 2002
61,500
Byrone: Alen was making sense, even in somewhat biased in this case (ofcourse not alone IN THAT), with his posts in general, until the petty avatar stuff. Thats just a really botched up attempt of playing the devil advocate (just reads like a bad parody), bit too much emo on it too.
 

Byrone

Peen Meister
Dec 19, 2005
30,778
If i were in charge i'd unban seven on two conditions.Those who want him unbanned to open a thread & sign,no off topic posts.

Once he's back & gets banned,all his loyal followers get a little vacation with him the next time he's out of line.
 

Alen

Ѕenior Аdmin
Apr 2, 2007
53,967
Do you have imaginary friends & relatives?
But why were others offended when Seven had an avatar of their imaginary friend?

Seven is too arrogant and he can be a complete asshole most of the time but the main problem, and in the end the main reason for his ban, was that his thoughts about religion, Islam in particular, were bothering some members.
Those comments weren't bothering me, Martin, Dule, Hoori and many more. Even if we didn't approve and didn'tagree with his vocabulary, we did like what he had to say about many topics. Why is that taken from us? Just because another group of people doesn't like to hear what Seven is saying?

That's bullshit.
Now this group of people, in which I belong, is offended by that picture of my God (the imaginary friend-PBUH).
 

Alen

Ѕenior Аdmin
Apr 2, 2007
53,967
Byrone: Alen was making sense until the petty avatar stuff.
That was only an example to show how lame the logic of Altair for approving Tahir's post was while he's always been a critic of Seven's antics.

I thought Fred and you were more intelligent than that. I sure didn't get offended by Fred's avatar. In fact I believe that everyone is free to make fun of everything he wants. By this logic, I'm not offended by any remark disapproving my beliefs and I also make fun of everything that I find "funny". The bold part is where Fred can't stand the likes of me. He's easily losing it when someone makes fun of his beliefs. The ironic part is that the same Fred of all people has no problem if his words are perceived as offensive by someone and even worse, he's woefully trying to justify it.
 

Bjerknes

"Top Economist"
Mar 16, 2004
116,112
Well then by the same logic, Seven has offended Arabs and Muslims on a constant basis. So how come you are so against his banning?
Because I'm not really for banning Tahir, but if the mods are the supposed class of the forum they can't be making such posts as the one under the microscope here.

I'm not really for banning folks unless they're spammers or complete and utter imbeciles.
 

Osman

Koul Khara!
Aug 30, 2002
61,500
I know where you are going with it, the intent with the charade, but just saying the way you used the avatar and basically most of your posts in that nature regarding the BS semantics of avatar analogy and whats offensive, to be a rather poor way to make a point.

Not that I necessarily disagree (and find your passionate way to defend Seven funny :D Even if agree with the hypocracy you pointed out in parts, even if bit selective), but just your posts been bit too much with those avatar stuff and lame philospying over whats offensive or not, more plain talk would make a point across alot better (so far whats offensive or not notion of yours is rather weak, even if as said agree on general hypocracy).
 

Byrone

Peen Meister
Dec 19, 2005
30,778
But why were others offended when Seven had an avatar of their imaginary friend?

Seven is too arrogant and he can be a complete asshole most of the time but the main problem, and in the end the main reason for his ban, was that his thoughts about religion, Islam in particular, were bothering some members.
Those comments weren't bothering me, Martin, Dule, Hoori and many more. Even if we didn't approve and didn'tagree with his vocabulary, we did like what he had to say about many topics. Why is that taken from us? Just because another group of people doesn't like to hear what Seven is saying?

That's bullshit.
Now this group of people, in which I belong, is offended by that picture of my God (the imaginary friend-PBUH).
See that's open for interpretation & i could get all self righteous about that.

Anyway back to the question,are seven's imaginary friends & relatives documented in a book that's follwed by millions?

Seven has zero social skills & its not the body of his message that's not liked it's the way he delivers his presentation.How does Martin make his point without provocation?Is seven incapable of restraining his petty mannerisms?

FYI i do agree that seven has made some interesting & thought provoking statements but we both know he gets a kick out of insulting them & basking in their obvious anger.
 
Sep 1, 2002
12,745
That was only an example to show how lame the logic of Altair for approving Tahir's post was while he's always been a critic of Seven's antics.

I thought Fred and you were more intelligent than that. I sure didn't get offended by Fred's avatar. In fact I believe that everyone is free to make fun of everything he wants. By this logic, I'm not offended by any remark disapproving my beliefs and I also make fun of everything that I find "funny". The bold part is where Fred can't stand the likes of me. He's easily losing it when someone makes fun of his beliefs. The ironic part is that the same Fred of all people has no problem if his words are perceived as offended by someone and even worse, he's woefully trying to justify it.
The problem with that argument is that you are not offended by anything, whereas others are. I would say the majority are, and therefore there has to be some fair moderation to ensure you don't offend others.

I agree it does seem ok to laugh about Jew-Boys and the holocaust, Christ and Women bashing, alas.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 25)