Hardy har har Martin :groan:
I can contributre when I want to and you know it. Plus, I'm incredibly charming and funny
Back on topic, I didnt get the whole architect thing in the second part. Is he human, a machine or a program? Also, how can Neo's powers strech to the outside world (when he stops the machines with his hand), I can accept the whole virus anomally thingy, but not a freaking superman. Also, have there been "The Ones" before, that have regulary been defeated as I understand it, and if so, why does the arhitect let them choose 23 people to rebuild the city when he could just destroy it?
I feel the first part was brilliant, both for the excellent story line and the visual effect, which were unpresedented at the time, but IMO the real success of the movie was because of it's philosophy that made it deep, something other Hollywood blockbusters lacked. The Matrix was not just simply eye candy, which is pretty much what the second and third part were. The Matrix questioned the morality so to say of the modern capitalist world where we are not what we are, but what others say we are, and it also raises the question of principle, to live happily in ignorance (like tha bald traitor guy) or to fight for what you believe in, maybe even dieing for the cause, and once you understand that you'll be able to somewhat understand the stance of terrorists, who feel the only way of controling their lives is by taking them, being pawns for a greater goal. Also, the movie deals with choices, not so much with what we choose and what the result will be, but more with why we make a certain choice, as it is an inner image of our psyche. It's like the scene in the first part when Neo brakes the vase in the Oracle's kitchen, and as the Oracle says, would he have broken it if she had not said anything. It's like if you tell a man he'll die in 24 hours, and he goes out, gets drunk and gets hit by a car. Would it have happened if you had said nothing? Did you make his destiny, just tell it to him, or is it a connected circle where everything is dependant on eachother?
The problem with the movie is too many questions in the first part, that get backed up with even more questions in the second part, but none of the questions get answered in the third part.
I can contributre when I want to and you know it. Plus, I'm incredibly charming and funny
Back on topic, I didnt get the whole architect thing in the second part. Is he human, a machine or a program? Also, how can Neo's powers strech to the outside world (when he stops the machines with his hand), I can accept the whole virus anomally thingy, but not a freaking superman. Also, have there been "The Ones" before, that have regulary been defeated as I understand it, and if so, why does the arhitect let them choose 23 people to rebuild the city when he could just destroy it?
I feel the first part was brilliant, both for the excellent story line and the visual effect, which were unpresedented at the time, but IMO the real success of the movie was because of it's philosophy that made it deep, something other Hollywood blockbusters lacked. The Matrix was not just simply eye candy, which is pretty much what the second and third part were. The Matrix questioned the morality so to say of the modern capitalist world where we are not what we are, but what others say we are, and it also raises the question of principle, to live happily in ignorance (like tha bald traitor guy) or to fight for what you believe in, maybe even dieing for the cause, and once you understand that you'll be able to somewhat understand the stance of terrorists, who feel the only way of controling their lives is by taking them, being pawns for a greater goal. Also, the movie deals with choices, not so much with what we choose and what the result will be, but more with why we make a certain choice, as it is an inner image of our psyche. It's like the scene in the first part when Neo brakes the vase in the Oracle's kitchen, and as the Oracle says, would he have broken it if she had not said anything. It's like if you tell a man he'll die in 24 hours, and he goes out, gets drunk and gets hit by a car. Would it have happened if you had said nothing? Did you make his destiny, just tell it to him, or is it a connected circle where everything is dependant on eachother?
The problem with the movie is too many questions in the first part, that get backed up with even more questions in the second part, but none of the questions get answered in the third part.
Buy on AliExpress.com
