so it does make more sense to name schweinsteigers name in the same threads were names like diego and co. there is a mile of a skill difference between diego and schweinsteiger ...
if you all blame the board for going for a "mediocre" mellberg you can not say that you want schweinsteiger...
we did have players of equal quality and send them away only to get a player that looks like crap and is not worth a penny more when it comes to how useful he is to the team.
compare it with your love for attractive football ...
you can have someone that does a thousand step-overs and then scores a goal
and you can have someone that always uses the side of his foot to score a goal
for me both players are worth the same, but i bet most of you do like robinho for doing his (imo useless) step overs and stuff. it might be more attractive (to your eyes) but i don't care about that and just like players that are efficient.
why is it more ridiculous to say " i would not like to have an ogre as player in the team" than "i would like to have my players thousands of step overs in a game" ? when the outcome is the same, than it is a choice of personal preferences.
i do like a 3-0 where every goal is only a side footed goal the same like a like a game we win 3-0 where every goal is scored by a bicycle kick! the outcome is the same ...
so when we have crap players that dont deliver and do not have a guess what to do with the ball in midfield (like palladino last season), then why buy another clueless player that on top of that looks that ugly ?
we could take palladino back and had the same efficiency just without scaring the kids in the stadium.
P.S.:
thx fred for starting a dialogue instead of that brainless quoting and childish words/name calling from our brainiacs here.
if you all blame the board for going for a "mediocre" mellberg you can not say that you want schweinsteiger...
I too dont rate the player dont get me wrong.
But what has his looks got to do with any of this??
But what has his looks got to do with any of this??
compare it with your love for attractive football ...
you can have someone that does a thousand step-overs and then scores a goal
and you can have someone that always uses the side of his foot to score a goal
for me both players are worth the same, but i bet most of you do like robinho for doing his (imo useless) step overs and stuff. it might be more attractive (to your eyes) but i don't care about that and just like players that are efficient.
why is it more ridiculous to say " i would not like to have an ogre as player in the team" than "i would like to have my players thousands of step overs in a game" ? when the outcome is the same, than it is a choice of personal preferences.
i do like a 3-0 where every goal is only a side footed goal the same like a like a game we win 3-0 where every goal is scored by a bicycle kick! the outcome is the same ...
so when we have crap players that dont deliver and do not have a guess what to do with the ball in midfield (like palladino last season), then why buy another clueless player that on top of that looks that ugly ?
we could take palladino back and had the same efficiency just without scaring the kids in the stadium.
P.S.:
thx fred for starting a dialogue instead of that brainless quoting and childish words/name calling from our brainiacs here.
