The Financial Situation (74 Viewers)

Bianconero81

Ageing Veteran
Jan 26, 2009
40,174
that's not. an italian team needs to be up there with the best clubs, and only juve have the chance to do that. you can call that a right business choice, take away some $$$ from ONLY ONE team, the best one :baus: i can't find any explanation for the change of contributions of the two chinese clubs either, but the cut juve received is plain stupid. juve is the ONLY disfavored team of the new system, that's what you call a penalty, but i can't see the ground for it.

serie a needs the strongest possible juve to keep or improve its appeal. they still haven't learned from calciopoli: once they put juve aside, serie a went downhill.
Yes, but it's not enough. No one wants to watch a one team league. Serie A should learn from Die Bundesliga and even Ligue 1. Make the league more attractive, so investors come in. New stadia, better atmosphere, a better brand of football, less racism, etc...

Juventus winning 10 consecutive Serie A titles and getting more money from the TV deal isn't good in the long term, not for the league, and not for Juve. We need to find other ways to generate income, and that will happen by attracting interesting players, playing better football, and remaining competitive in Europe on a consistent basis.
 

Buy on AliExpress.com

s4tch

Senior Member
Mar 23, 2015
33,585
in any part of the world you manage to get a more balanced league by weakening the strongest team, and only the strongest team. you do that by strengthening the lesser ones.

also, take away ANY domestic money from real, barcelona, bayern or manutd, and heads are gonna roll.
 

zizinho

Senior Member
Apr 14, 2013
51,816
has the new tv money distribution been discussed yet? this pic speaks for itself:



juve is the team that still attracts some international viewers, yet it's the only club that would get less from the bigger pool. congrats, you morons leading italian football.
how do they calculate this anyway? how does milan suddenly get less than inter?
 

s4tch

Senior Member
Mar 23, 2015
33,585
19 out of 20 teams get more money, from their perspective this deal is great.

And us having more money means shit for the league, look at PSG.
it could have been 20 out of 20 getting more money.

psg and its "galacticos" attracts a lot of viewers towards other clubs, too. for instance, digi is the tv company that broadcasts serie a and league 1 in hungary, and in case psg play at 20:45 on saturdays, they move that match to their 1st channel (out of 3 in hungary). it's a well considered move as psg's matches are more watched in hungary than a random serie a match not including juve or milan.
 

Xperd

Allegrophobic Infidel
Jun 1, 2012
34,838
Sooner or later Serie A teams would've demanded parity just that it has happened now. Both PL and Bundesliga have followed the same model and it was inevitable Serie A did the same.

If an equal share deal means 'weakening' Juventus then I'm afraid they can't sustain themselves in the long term. We are experiencing a fortunate phase of pocketing as much TV money as we can. Next season will have 4 Italian teams in CL so the market pool share is going to be much lesser for us compared to previous seasons. Sooner or later this was going to happen.

Even the management knows that hence are finding alternate solutions to increase revenue.

I personally think it's a good move because this league needs to be repackaged big time. Juventus aren't like oil rich PSG where they can buy superstars without breaking a sweat so they are dependent on the league one way or another, for their growth.
 

icemaη

Rab's Husband - The Regista
Moderator
Aug 27, 2008
36,323
how do they calculate this anyway? how does milan suddenly get less than inter?
Current split is basically this:
40% of pot is divided equally among 20 clubs
30% is divided based on popularity of the club (attendance, season tickets etc. and also population of the city)
15% based on past five years performance
15% based on last year performance

In the new deal they are increasing the equal distribution part to 50% while, as far as I can tell, reducing the money made from club popularity part to 20%. Hence why our change is drastic.
 
Jul 2, 2006
19,433
has the new tv money distribution been discussed yet? this pic speaks for itself:



juve is the team that still attracts some international viewers, yet it's the only club that would get less from the bigger pool. congrats, you morons leading italian football.
if true, club should sell his own rights to another channel. this is unacceptable.
 

zizinho

Senior Member
Apr 14, 2013
51,816
icemaη;5690198 said:
Current split is basically this:
40% of pot is divided equally among 20 clubs
30% is divided based on popularity of the club (attendance, season tickets etc. and also population of the city)
15% based on past five years performance
15% based on last year performance

In the new deal they are increasing the equal distribution part to 50% while, as far as I can tell, reducing the money made from club popularity part to 20%. Hence why our change is drastic.
How does inter get more than Napoli and Roma then? The 50%+15%+15% should clearly favor them and i dont think inter is that much more popular than them for the Popularity 20% to make a difference, otherwise the gap with us and Milan would be larger as well. Quite clearly inter benefits the most out of this from the top clubs, and i wanna know why
 

icemaη

Rab's Husband - The Regista
Moderator
Aug 27, 2008
36,323
How does inter get more than Napoli and Roma then? The 50%+15%+15% should clearly favor them and i dont think inter is that much more popular than them for the Popularity 20% to make a difference, otherwise the gap with us and Milan would be larger as well. Quite clearly inter benefits the most out of this from the top clubs, and i wanna know why
I think that table is wrong. The future season column adds up to ~1.2bn euros, while the deal is only worth 1.05bn euros :shifty:
 

Maddy

Oracle of Copenhagen
Jul 10, 2009
16,545
How does inter get more than Napoli and Roma then? The 50%+15%+15% should clearly favor them and i dont think inter is that much more popular than them for the Popularity 20% to make a difference, otherwise the gap with us and Milan would be larger as well. Quite clearly inter benefits the most out of this from the top clubs, and i wanna know why
With the new deal according Stich' source, Inter is - besides Milan and Juve - the club that benefits the least, they only have a revenue increase of around 12% unliek Roma with 17% and Napoli with 23% (quick math).

Looking at this picture, it's clear Inter have a lot to lose on popularity just as Juve and Milan

 

pitbull

Senior Member
Jul 26, 2007
11,045
19 out of 20 teams get more money, from their perspective this deal is great.

And us having more money means shit for the league, look at PSG.
I recently read a random footie agent stating that young french stars don't want to leave Ligue 1 for Serie A nowadays as opposed to the past and it does seem true that we hear less and less about import from Ligue 1. PSG probably has something to do with it
 

Xperd

Allegrophobic Infidel
Jun 1, 2012
34,838
If this equal distribution of money is applied to la Liga I am sure Barcelona and Real Madrid will play in another league
And which league ? Nearly every top league follows the equal distribution model now. They'll have no choice but to accept. And besides , they make enough money as it is to be majorly affected by this equal distribution model.
 

juve123

Senior Member
Aug 10, 2017
16,638
And which league ? Nearly every top league follows the equal distribution model now. They'll have no choice but to accept. And besides , they make enough money as it is to be majorly affected by this equal distribution model.
I am talking about model where juventus TV rights decrease from 122 million euros to 91 euros if Barcelona earned 140 million euros from the TV rights from the same model
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 70)