The Financial Situation (81 Viewers)
- Thread starter ReBeL
- Start date
the real money made either in Asia or the US
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/fo...ist-sponsors-helping-3billion-super-club.html
(this article is from 2013. by now they have even improved some of their deals/signed new ones for much more money + the upcoming adidas deal and 70M+ each year)
to be fair, they are spending their own money. those guys earn shitload of money from sponsors, not to mention the asian tours they make almost every summer, TV revenue, allways sold out stadium (Old Trafford has around 70000-75000 seats i think + expensive tickets) etc.
(this article is from 2013. by now they have even improved some of their deals/signed new ones for much more money + the upcoming adidas deal and 70M+ each year)
to be fair, they are spending their own money. those guys earn shitload of money from sponsors, not to mention the asian tours they make almost every summer, TV revenue, allways sold out stadium (Old Trafford has around 70000-75000 seats i think + expensive tickets) etc.
FFP won't hamper utd, they simply bring in way too much money, the likes of them, Real ,Barca, Bayern etc will never be effected unlessntyey drop out of the CL for half a decade.
It was designed to stop the City's and PSG's of the world who can't produce big financial turnovers yet spend like there is no tomorrow.
It was designed to stop the City's and PSG's of the world who can't produce big financial turnovers yet spend like there is no tomorrow.
No the idea is not good at all. It's all about status quo. Because of it smaller clubs can't get to the top while the big ones will never be punished for big spending (Real, Barca, Bayern, MU etc.).
If UEFA wants to stop the ridiculous spending they simply shouldn't pay so much to big clubs for CL. The market's gone crazy way before City and PSG so those clubs can't really take the blame for that.
Besides those rules are stupid. If an investor wants to invest, why limiting him? The club is his property as well as the money he has. It's just dumb to tell the guy what he's supposed to do with his own money isn't it?
If UEFA wants to stop the ridiculous spending they simply shouldn't pay so much to big clubs for CL. The market's gone crazy way before City and PSG so those clubs can't really take the blame for that.
Besides those rules are stupid. If an investor wants to invest, why limiting him? The club is his property as well as the money he has. It's just dumb to tell the guy what he's supposed to do with his own money isn't it?
I think exactly the opposite to this. Why would you do that? If someone is willing to pay you big money for your job why should someone else limit it for you? It's none of their business how much you earn. Imagine you earn 10000 dollars per month and someone says it's unfair so it's limited down to 4000. Is it fair?
You can't just set a barrier and be content with yourself you just did it. It's not fair and yet it creates new problems around it. How do you determine the limit? There's always someone who would set it differently and in such case his opinion will be as good as his.
There was a time when Italian teams spent shitload of money and nobody in Italy complained about it. It's time to grow a pair and work hard to be able to join the EU's biggest. No matter how many limits UEFA creates, Juve won't benefit from that. More like it will bite them in the ass.
You can't just set a barrier and be content with yourself you just did it. It's not fair and yet it creates new problems around it. How do you determine the limit? There's always someone who would set it differently and in such case his opinion will be as good as his.
There was a time when Italian teams spent shitload of money and nobody in Italy complained about it. It's time to grow a pair and work hard to be able to join the EU's biggest. No matter how many limits UEFA creates, Juve won't benefit from that. More like it will bite them in the ass.