tell your carer they shouldn't let you on the computer until they have cleaned up all the drool, otherwise crap like this gets typed on the keyboard
Buy on AliExpress.com
The Financial Situation (59 Viewers)
- Thread starter ReBeL
- Start date
Buy on AliExpress.com
Haha. The new generation of females are quite tall too (cue ladyboy jokes). They do like tall men, even though some shorter guys get away with the whole "cute and harmless" look.
- - - Updated - - -
I wasn't offended at all 
I just saw it as an ideal opportunity to take a not so subtle dig at you
- - - Updated - - -
Shit, didn't see that until now.
Sorry man if I've offended you, didn't mean to, though my post actually was a bit offensive now that I think about it.
I only make offensive jokes about people or thinks I like though, if that helps in any way
Sorry man if I've offended you, didn't mean to, though my post actually was a bit offensive now that I think about it.
I only make offensive jokes about people or thinks I like though, if that helps in any way
I just saw it as an ideal opportunity to take a not so subtle dig at you 
That makes more sense. Never got the alleged fetish of asian females for tall men tho. Especially considering the stereotype that they are okay with plenty of action(if true).
I mean, considering the smaller average vagina volume, its just seeking issues. Beeing to large is pretty damn annoying for quantity
I mean, considering the smaller average vagina volume, its just seeking issues. Beeing to large is pretty damn annoying for quantity
I will be expecting some movements on the market very soon, not because of that figure posted above, since that has already been budgeted for, but mostly because our co-ownerships are resolved and that is one worry less for our mgt. By reaching an agreement with Sass over Berardi we solved the last problem in that regard, that is for now and our mercato practically started. It will be extremely important to offload few players, like Quag and Vuci, not for the the reasons of the immediate monetary gains, but reducing wage bill should be our imperative and making more room for arrivals seems sensible at this point, when roughly 70% of our income has been spend on salaries for personnel. By Increasing that percentage further we would be risking our stability.
Agreed.
I think it's pretty obvious that Juventus overpaid on a lot of talent in attempts to pull ourselves out of those back-to-back seasons of 7th place. However, by bringing in multitudes of average to above average talent on high wages, it has caught up to us in a way as now our wage bill is stuffed with players who contribute little but soak up so much of our wage bill. These players, whose wages range from 1-2m per season, are the kinds of players we need to remove from our wage bill, replacing them (like the big club do) with younger, cheaper options.
I think it's pretty obvious that Juventus overpaid on a lot of talent in attempts to pull ourselves out of those back-to-back seasons of 7th place. However, by bringing in multitudes of average to above average talent on high wages, it has caught up to us in a way as now our wage bill is stuffed with players who contribute little but soak up so much of our wage bill. These players, whose wages range from 1-2m per season, are the kinds of players we need to remove from our wage bill, replacing them (like the big club do) with younger, cheaper options.
Market pool for Italy is fixed. Half of market pool is distributed according to previous year's league position and half of it according to the number of matches played.
If Juve played more matches only the second part would increase but not more than €4-5m at the expense of Milan and Napoli. The major difference would have been the performance based money: €3.5m from round-16, €3.9m from QF.
Juve got €7m from Europa League which almost compensates for that. Also Juve player 4 home matches instead of 2. Only if Juve played CL semifinals would have Juve got more money for sure.
CL and Europa League 13/14: distribution to clubs
http://www.uefa.com/MultimediaFiles...aorg/Finance/02/11/95/44/2119544_DOWNLOAD.pdf
If Juve played more matches only the second part would increase but not more than €4-5m at the expense of Milan and Napoli. The major difference would have been the performance based money: €3.5m from round-16, €3.9m from QF.
Juve got €7m from Europa League which almost compensates for that. Also Juve player 4 home matches instead of 2. Only if Juve played CL semifinals would have Juve got more money for sure.
CL and Europa League 13/14: distribution to clubs
http://www.uefa.com/MultimediaFiles...aorg/Finance/02/11/95/44/2119544_DOWNLOAD.pdf
Regarding money to buy players... let's say we have an established revenue of 270M/year now.
Of these, around 220M are for wages + fee installments.
As reports say, we have already reached that level, considering we pay a lot of installments every year and we are still paying for the likes of Bonucci, Quagliarella, Matri, Giovinco, Isla, Asamoah, Litch, Caceres, Vidal, Ogbonna, Tevez, etc. This means that before we sign new players, we have to let some of them go, at least to shed salary off. We cannot increase our spending this year.
Next year we will be able to spend some money, as part of these fee installments will be gone and our revenue should increase 30/50M.
The salaries and value of some players who aren't useful anymore are:
Vucinic - 3M net - 6M/year; (value around 5M)
Quagliarella - 2.1M net - 4.2M/year; (value around 4M)
Giovinco - 1.4M net - 2.8M/year; (value around 6M)
Isla - 1.4M net - 2.8M/year; (value around 6M)
Pepe - 1.3M net - 2.6M/year; (no value because of injuries)
De Ceglie - 1.3M net - 2.6M/year; (value around 3M)
Peluso - 0.8M net - 1.6M/year; (value around 3M)
Padoin - 0.7M net - 1.4M/year; (value around 2M)
Motta - 0.6M net - 1.2M/year. (value around 1M)
If Marotta is successful in shipping these guys away for their current value and not needing to pay part of their salaries, the total saved would be of around 25M in salaries only. Plus increase of 30M in revenue from sales. If these sales are received in 2 installments it equals 15M revenue.
If you include Immobile and Zaza's sales both paid in 2 installments it makes a total of 25M saved in salaries + 22M increase in revenues by sales.
It makes a grand total of 47M to spend this year with new players signings = 1st installments + annual salary.
If we for example signed Sanchez for 30M in 3 installments and a net 5M wages his annual cost would be of 20M.
This money would be enough to sign one great player and a few other good players, with lower salaries. That may be the reason why they are chasing young players.
So even without being able to actually spend money, we can have a decent mercato. But it completely depends on Marotta's ability to sell our players, specially Vucinic, Quags, Giovinco, Isla, Pepe, De Ceglie. Not even for a high price, but just for a small but fair price and without having to keep paying part of their salaries.
Of these, around 220M are for wages + fee installments.
As reports say, we have already reached that level, considering we pay a lot of installments every year and we are still paying for the likes of Bonucci, Quagliarella, Matri, Giovinco, Isla, Asamoah, Litch, Caceres, Vidal, Ogbonna, Tevez, etc. This means that before we sign new players, we have to let some of them go, at least to shed salary off. We cannot increase our spending this year.
Next year we will be able to spend some money, as part of these fee installments will be gone and our revenue should increase 30/50M.
The salaries and value of some players who aren't useful anymore are:
Vucinic - 3M net - 6M/year; (value around 5M)
Quagliarella - 2.1M net - 4.2M/year; (value around 4M)
Giovinco - 1.4M net - 2.8M/year; (value around 6M)
Isla - 1.4M net - 2.8M/year; (value around 6M)
Pepe - 1.3M net - 2.6M/year; (no value because of injuries)
De Ceglie - 1.3M net - 2.6M/year; (value around 3M)
Peluso - 0.8M net - 1.6M/year; (value around 3M)
Padoin - 0.7M net - 1.4M/year; (value around 2M)
Motta - 0.6M net - 1.2M/year. (value around 1M)
If Marotta is successful in shipping these guys away for their current value and not needing to pay part of their salaries, the total saved would be of around 25M in salaries only. Plus increase of 30M in revenue from sales. If these sales are received in 2 installments it equals 15M revenue.
If you include Immobile and Zaza's sales both paid in 2 installments it makes a total of 25M saved in salaries + 22M increase in revenues by sales.
It makes a grand total of 47M to spend this year with new players signings = 1st installments + annual salary.
If we for example signed Sanchez for 30M in 3 installments and a net 5M wages his annual cost would be of 20M.
This money would be enough to sign one great player and a few other good players, with lower salaries. That may be the reason why they are chasing young players.
So even without being able to actually spend money, we can have a decent mercato. But it completely depends on Marotta's ability to sell our players, specially Vucinic, Quags, Giovinco, Isla, Pepe, De Ceglie. Not even for a high price, but just for a small but fair price and without having to keep paying part of their salaries.