Worst way to do negotiation. They tested our end of line and when we keep increase our offers, they know we have resource and in the end meet their €60m expectation.
In beginning €40m , €45m + €5m , €50m + €5m , €52m + €7m.
It's actually better if we look elsewhere.
Koop certainly can improve us but i dont see him as irreplacable. There are lots of alternatives for Koop
Which is the most important for sustainability. 50-60 mil is overpaying... If he doesn't perform, it's a huge waste ofc and probably big capital loss as well... If he does, it won't weigh that heavy.
total cost would still be probably much higher than Koop
Koop yearly cost with reported fee and wages will be about 20m.
Bernardo Silva, depending on the length of the contract close to 30m annually (if we really believe he is even available for 35m in the first place).
I know he is a better player, but we dont only need quality but also bodies and his cost would be similiar to signing both Nico Gonzalez and Koop.
Worst way to do negotiation. They tested our end of line and when we keep increase our offers, they know we have resource and in the end meet their €60m expectation.
In beginning €40m , €45m + €5m , €50m + €5m , €52m + €7m.
It's actually better if we look elsewhere.
Koop certainly can improve us but i dont see him as irreplacable. There are lots of alternatives for Koop