Terrorism (27 Viewers)
- Thread starter Zlatan
- Start date
- Status
Damn that first link gave me chills. But I really do not believe that the info given in that video is feasable evidence for their case. It does look suspicious, but I have heard many people's accounts, and they all stated that they watched the 737 fly into the Pentagon.
The Twin Tower demolition one is a farce. There is video of both planes flying into the towers, both of which were broadcasted live here for all to see. The people who made that site also do not know simple laws of physics that pertain to skyscrapers.
The Twin Tower demolition one is a farce. There is video of both planes flying into the towers, both of which were broadcasted live here for all to see. The people who made that site also do not know simple laws of physics that pertain to skyscrapers.
BTW, I just watched a National Georpahic documentary about the biggest civil air disaster ever, the Tenerife plane crash. Check it out here
http://www.super70s.com/Super70s/Tech/Aviation/Disasters/77-03-27(Tenerife).asp
Two Boing 747s collided on the ground and left over 500 people dead.
http://www.super70s.com/Super70s/Tech/Aviation/Disasters/77-03-27(Tenerife).asp
Two Boing 747s collided on the ground and left over 500 people dead.
It's interesting that these people have asked questions about the tragedy. By all means, fine. No harm in that. It's good to see some people try to analyize it on their own and not just take in what they're fed by the media.
Anyhow, having said that. I don't agree with their analysis. There are too many why's and if's involved. I don't think their case holds water, though I do believe that there's a lot more involved in the issue. I don't belive the public knows the whole truth or the most accurate details. So there must be little lies here and there.
Anyhow, having said that. I don't agree with their analysis. There are too many why's and if's involved. I don't think their case holds water, though I do believe that there's a lot more involved in the issue. I don't belive the public knows the whole truth or the most accurate details. So there must be little lies here and there.
A whole 757 to desintigrate and leave absolutely no debris??? I find that hard to believe. There would have to be evidence of it hitting the Pentagon, the wings, engines, something.
Look at these pictures:
Those are pictures of the KLM Boing 747 involved in the Tenerife disaster in '77. The plane crashed into another Pan Am Boing 747, and burst into flames. it had completely refueled just two hours earlier. My point is, no matter how fast or how much fuel, a plane cant just dissapear, disintigrate into thin air without leaving at least some debris.
Look at these pictures:
Those are pictures of the KLM Boing 747 involved in the Tenerife disaster in '77. The plane crashed into another Pan Am Boing 747, and burst into flames. it had completely refueled just two hours earlier. My point is, no matter how fast or how much fuel, a plane cant just dissapear, disintigrate into thin air without leaving at least some debris.
A plane, though, can seem to dissapear when hitting other debris, i.e. buildings. The plane which hit the Pentagon went straight into the body of the structure, not touching the ground first. The jet would not have stopped there, either, as the main body of the aircraft would have travelled further into the structure, along with other big parts of the craft. Now that 'documentary' does not show pictures further inside of the Pentagon now does it? All they showed was a little hole in the wall futher inside the Pentagon, which was obviously man-made for fire fighters. The makers of the film did not even bother to edit the words "punched out", which were spray painted on the wall next to the hole. That is another falsity of the documentary.
- Status