Terrorism (20 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Vinman

2013 Prediction Cup Champ
Jul 16, 2002
11,482
++ [ originally posted by Majed ] ++
It's more convenient for them to think of us as anti-American (How insulting, being that I am an American!!?), because that makes our views illegitimate.
No offense pal, but its ppl who think like you (which I would call "liberals" ) that will be the demise of this country

We need another guy like Clinton running the country, so he can ignore the impending waves of attacks against this country
 

Bjerknes

"Top Economist"
Mar 16, 2004
115,928
++ [ originally posted by Vinman ] ++


No offense pal, but its ppl who think like you (which I would call "liberals" ) that will be the demise of this country
Don't you think that's a little extreme Vinny? I mean, depending on how you look at it, the same could be said about the Bush era.
 
OP

Zlatan

Senior Member
Jun 9, 2003
23,049
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #945
    ++ [ originally posted by Andy ] ++


    Besides attacking Bush, some people label our government as a whole in the same tone as Bush. Or some just make up absurd things like the U.S. will attack Sweden or we fix other elections. That's what gets me.
    I never said anything about Sweden. The elections, on the other hand... ;)


    ++ [ originally posted by Vinman ] ++


    No offense pal, but its ppl who think like you (which I would call "liberals" ) that will be the demise of this country

    We need another guy like Clinton running the country, so he can ignore the impending waves of attacks against this country

    9/11 happen under Bush's watch. He had 8-9 months to prepare the country for future attacks. He didnt.
     

    Vinman

    2013 Prediction Cup Champ
    Jul 16, 2002
    11,482
    ++ [ originally posted by Andy ] ++


    Don't you think that's a little extreme Vinny? I mean, depending on how you look at it, the same could be said about the Bush era.

    NO...our national security is the number 1 issue right now, and the liberals dont see it that way


    Remember Andy- Kerry will say ANYTHING to get elected


    Mark my words, if Kerry wins, he'll make cuts to our homeland security budget
     

    Vinman

    2013 Prediction Cup Champ
    Jul 16, 2002
    11,482
    ++ [ originally posted by Zlatan ] ++


    I never said anything about Sweden. The elections, on the other hand... ;)





    9/11 happen under Bush's watch. He had 8-9 months to prepare the country for future attacks. He didnt.
    Excuse me, MR. Expert, but the 9-11 planning was all done under Clintons watch.....everthing but the actual date was done before Jan 2001
     
    OP

    Zlatan

    Senior Member
    Jun 9, 2003
    23,049
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #948
    ++ [ originally posted by Vinman ] ++


    No offense pal, but its ppl who think like you (which I would call "liberals" ) that will be the demise of this country

    We need another guy like Clinton running the country, so he can ignore the impending waves of attacks against this country
    Again, why exactly is "liberal" an insult?
     
    OP

    Zlatan

    Senior Member
    Jun 9, 2003
    23,049
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #949
    ++ [ originally posted by Vinman ] ++


    Excuse me, MR. Expert, but the 9-11 planning was all done under Clintons watch.....everthing but the actual date was done before Jan 2001
    I'm not pretending to be the expert, you are.

    But let me ask you this: are you saying that the terrorists, got together, made a plan before Bush was elected, kept silent for 10 months and on 9/11 did something they planned a year before, having no contact in the meantime? damn, thats some planning. Clinton didnt know what would happen, neither did Bush. But my point is this: If Clinton knew there was a problem (as you claim), Bush would have known it too, and he would have paid more attention to it prior to 9/11.
     

    Vinman

    2013 Prediction Cup Champ
    Jul 16, 2002
    11,482
    ++ [ originally posted by Zlatan ] ++


    Again, why exactly is "liberal" an insult?
    Its not an insult...... but there is something very wrong about ppl who are compassionate towards terrorists who would like nothing better than killing them because their not a fundamentalist Muslim, and because they are American
     
    OP

    Zlatan

    Senior Member
    Jun 9, 2003
    23,049
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #951
    Who said they were compassionate to the terrorists? I'd sooner say they were compassionate to the innocent people dying every day at the hands of the US Army. Is there something wrong with that?
     

    Majed

    Senior Member
    Jul 17, 2002
    9,630
    ++ [ originally posted by Vinman ] ++


    No offense pal, but its ppl who think like you (which I would call "liberals" ) that will be the demise of this country
    What happened to unity, respect, and freedom of speech?

    The demise to this country would only happen when our unity is disrupted. Ask yourself if calling people, who don't agree with you, yet who care as much as you about these issues, anti-american is keeping us united.

    I can read your posts all day and bang my head on the wall for the lack of logical arguments in many of them, but I'll never insult you by calling you Anti-American.



    Take note. Yes, from a 21 year old.
     

    Vinman

    2013 Prediction Cup Champ
    Jul 16, 2002
    11,482
    ++ [ originally posted by Zlatan ] ++


    I'm not pretending to be the expert, you are.

    But let me ask you this: are you saying that the terrorists, got together, made a plan before Bush was elected, kept silent for 10 months and on 9/11 did something they planned a year before, having no contact in the meantime? damn, thats some planning. Clinton didnt know what would happen, neither did Bush. But my point is this: If Clinton knew there was a problem (as you claim), Bush would have known it too, and he would have paid more attention to it prior to 9/11.
    First of all, I know alot about this subject..........

    They had planning this attack since the first WTC attack that failed......

    Bin Laden declared war on the US in 1996

    Clinton did zilch after 3 more terrorists attacks

    Clinton was not a war time pres- he didnt like to think about hurting others

    All the planning , recon, and training was done prior to Jan 2001, it was only when Bin Laden gave the order, that it was time

    The only info that Bush got from Clinton was in Feb 2001 that terrorists might try to hijack a plane....no other info was given (the reason he got that info so late was because with all the monotony after the 2000 election, Clinton and the democrats were still bitter, and made the Bush admin wait for everything...TRUE FACT !!
     
    OP

    Zlatan

    Senior Member
    Jun 9, 2003
    23,049
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #954
    OK, but lets look at this from another perspective. I'm pretty sure it didnt go like this:

    "Clinton: Look George, we think someone's gonna hijack a plane somewhere.
    Bush: Yeah, OK, thanks for the info playa"


    I'm pretty sure that there would be other people that would be able to pass the info on from one administration to the other. The CIA director for example, the military intelligence, etc. I really, REALLY doubt that Bush didnt have the same info Clinton did.

    EDIT: Also, even if all the planning did take place before Bush, I'm pretty sure the terrorists had to keep in touch during that time.
     

    Vinman

    2013 Prediction Cup Champ
    Jul 16, 2002
    11,482
    ++ [ originally posted by Majed ] ++


    What happened to unity, respect, and freedom of speech?

    The demise to this country would only happen when our unity is disrupted. Ask yourself if calling people, who don't agree with you, yet who care as much as you about these issues, anti-american is keeping us united.

    I can read your posts all day and bang my head on the wall for the lack of logical arguments in many of them, but I'll never insult you by calling you Anti-American.



    Take note. Yes, from a 21 year old.
    I never called you "anti American", so dont put words in my mouth

    Believe me, our unity will be disrupted if Bin Laden has his way and blows off a few bombs here in the US

    Not logical arguments ??? Yes, and 9-11 never really happened either did it ?????
     

    Bjerknes

    "Top Economist"
    Mar 16, 2004
    115,928
    Interesting story today.

    In the history of the National Football League, the Washington Redskins have a rather superstitious, but telling, record before Presidential Elections. Maybe not what you think though.

    The Redskins have won 11 games the weekend before the Presidential Elections in the team's history. These 11 wins against different opposition were followed by a Republican victory in the Presidential Elections the following Tuesday. Now in the other six games the Redskins have played before a Presidential Election, they lost them all. Incidently, in the same Elections after those 6 Redskin loses, the Incumbent Party has lost each respective election. Now this might be an Urban Legend or whatever, but so far this unofficial election predictor has been correct, ever since the 1940's.





    Oh by the way, the Green Bay Packers beat the Redskins in Washington on Sunday, 28-14.
     

    Majed

    Senior Member
    Jul 17, 2002
    9,630
    ++ [ originally posted by Vinman ] ++


    I never called you "anti American", so dont put words in my mouth

    Believe me, our unity will be disrupted if Bin Laden has his way and blows off a few bombs here in the US

    Not logical arguments ??? Yes, and 9-11 never really happened either did it ?????
    I'm glad you don't think that about me, but let me hit two birds with one stone here:

    I don't agree with the US gov.'s policy and I think Bush has been crap. That's pretty much what others have been saying, yet they are anti-american and I'm not?


    "Got Logic?!"


    There's no doubt that we can't let another attack happen. No arguments here.

    I just looked it up, yes, I think 9-11 did Happen. :rolleyes:
     

    Vinman

    2013 Prediction Cup Champ
    Jul 16, 2002
    11,482
    ++ [ originally posted by Majed ] ++


    I'm glad you don't think that about me, but let me hit two birds with one stone here:

    I don't agree with the US gov.'s policy and I think Bush has been crap. That's pretty much what others have been saying, yet they are anti-american and I'm not?


    "Got Logic?!"


    There's no doubt that we can't let another attack happen. No arguments here.

    I just looked it up, yes, I think 9-11 did Happen. :rolleyes:
    I'm glad we cleared the air there............

    Let me ask you this, you may not agree with everything Bush does, and I dont agree with everything either, but, have we been attacked since 9-11 ???

    Do you think the Patriot Act is working ????

    So, everything he has done to protect us isnt crap
     
    Jan 7, 2004
    29,704
    ++ [ originally posted by Andy ] ++
    Interesting story today.

    In the history of the National Football League, the Washington Redskins have a rather superstitious, but telling, record before Presidential Elections. Maybe not what you think though.

    The Redskins have won 11 games the weekend before the Presidential Elections in the team's history. These 11 wins against different opposition were followed by a Republican victory in the Presidential Elections the following Tuesday. Now in the other six games the Redskins have played before a Presidential Election, they lost them all. Incidently, in the same Elections after those 6 Redskin loses, the Incumbent Party has lost each respective election. Now this might be an Urban Legend or whatever, but so far this unofficial election predictor has been correct, ever since the 1940's.





    Oh by the way, the Green Bay Packers beat the Redskins in Washington on Sunday, 28-14.


    stupid coincidence (again)
     

    swag

    L'autista
    Administrator
    Sep 23, 2003
    84,749
    ++ [ originally posted by Vinman ] ++
    Let me ask you this, you may not agree with everything Bush does, and I dont agree with everything either, but, have we been attacked since 9-11 ???

    Do you think the Patriot Act is working ????

    So, everything he has done to protect us isnt crap
    While I understand what you're getting at, I derive no confidence from the past three years where we've lacked major terrorist attacks on our soil. As I mentioned previously in this thread, the terrorists took 8 1/2 years to return to the WTC ... and during a time when anti-terrorist scrutiny was far more lax than it is today.

    If we say that being rightfully prepared for terrorism means that we don't take anything for granted and that we don't shortchange the capacity of what horrible things terrorists are committed to doing (as we did with 9/11), we equally cannot take any confidence that the past three years are any indicator of future results. Fundamentalist Islam thinks in terms of centuries, not years. The past three years are a blink of an eye to terrorists, but an eternity for attention-deficit-disorder American culture.
     
    Status
    Not open for further replies.

    Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 19)