tactics and formations (27 Viewers)
- Thread starter sateeh
- Start date
- Status
Absolutely. He's no Camoranesi, but he's an intelligent player who knows how to twist and turn with the ball to his favour. He also has this special number which I've seen him perform three times this season 
:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u-ngtHv4g8A
:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u-ngtHv4g8A
yeah, there are these kinds of players that do naturally try to run down the wings when they get the ball and other players that are more comfortable to play in central positions keeping possession by passing and not just running forward ...
marchisio is surely the second type of player, that was easy to see last time he had to play on the right, in the match where marchionni roamed to the left
marchisio is surely the second type of player, that was easy to see last time he had to play on the right, in the match where marchionni roamed to the left
me either.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/blog/2009/mar/25/the-question-full-backs-football
Very good article on the development, and importance, of the full back.
Very good article on the development, and importance, of the full back.
The way Manchester United played in the Champions League last year is my ideal kind of football. I'm bringing them up because we actually have quite similar squads.
They essentially played a formation which easily switched between 4-4-2 and 4-3-3, and what we lack to play like they did is a creative midfielder and better fullbacks.
On paper you had this:
Van der Sar
Brown, Ferdinand, Vidic, Evra
Hargreaves, Scholes, Carrick, Ronaldo
Tevez, Rooney
With Ronaldo and Evra being the more attacking pair, and the opposite side providing width whenever necessary but also able to strengthen the defence and midfield. In attack, this would become pretty much a 4-3-3.
In our team, Marchisio can be our Hargreaves. Giovinco = Ronaldo. Amauri and Del Piero are not worse than Tevez and Rooney in terms of being able to bring the rest into play. (or anything else, really). And like I have said before, Marchisio has everything necessary to be a good right midfielder if he has other players around him who are more attacking.
They essentially played a formation which easily switched between 4-4-2 and 4-3-3, and what we lack to play like they did is a creative midfielder and better fullbacks.
On paper you had this:
Van der Sar
Brown, Ferdinand, Vidic, Evra
Hargreaves, Scholes, Carrick, Ronaldo
Tevez, Rooney
With Ronaldo and Evra being the more attacking pair, and the opposite side providing width whenever necessary but also able to strengthen the defence and midfield. In attack, this would become pretty much a 4-3-3.
In our team, Marchisio can be our Hargreaves. Giovinco = Ronaldo. Amauri and Del Piero are not worse than Tevez and Rooney in terms of being able to bring the rest into play. (or anything else, really). And like I have said before, Marchisio has everything necessary to be a good right midfielder if he has other players around him who are more attacking.
................Buffon
????...Canna....Chiellini...Criscito/DC
..........Momo....Marchisio
..Camo......Diego...........Gio
...............Amauri
or 4-4-2 with Ale in front
Criscito,Cannavaro,Diego whos next?we need a reliable RB
im praying to GOD to keep Gigi and Trez...i really hope the new coach make the best available choices because im very very dissapointed the last 46 days.
????...Canna....Chiellini...Criscito/DC
..........Momo....Marchisio
..Camo......Diego...........Gio
...............Amauri
or 4-4-2 with Ale in front
Criscito,Cannavaro,Diego whos next?we need a reliable RB
im praying to GOD to keep Gigi and Trez...i really hope the new coach make the best available choices because im very very dissapointed the last 46 days.
- Status