tactics and formations (27 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Bjerknes

"Top Economist"
Mar 16, 2004
115,912
Hi to everyone , i'm a long time juve fan but just reccently joined this forum .
In my opinion what our team needs more than anything , is a sporting director with a better vision for the future and better nose for talent .I am awful with numbers and years but i remember the january transfer window of a few years ago.Things started sluggish for us after the winter break ,lost some ground to the second place ,it looked like the begining of the end when....someone had signed Edgar "muthafucking" Davids and what a turn around that was .The midfield got the tank that we needed.Anyone else remembers what i'm talking about? So the message is this that it takes one well placed bid ...one key player signed to turn it all around and re-energize the team .I would beg Ranieri to give Marchioni his 5 cents and let him go quietly into the night ,not only does he not contribute anything to our team but his unneccesary one-on-one duels with the opponents defenders cost us possesion and we become proned to be countered.Sissoko (momo) is in my opinion filling Deschamps shoes very well ,a true destroyer and ball snatch-and-distributor.Can we resurrect the glory days of 4-3-3 (ravanelli,vialli,del piero up front) where every match we won was 3-0 or 4-1?To do that we need two momo-s and a healthy Camo in the middle and chiellini ,zebina,molinaro,mellberg. (not in that particular order)

Albanian by birth
American by choice
Juventino by the grace of god
Welcome to the forums. Good first post.
 

Sadomin

Senior Member
Apr 5, 2005
7,327
He can beat his man? I must have been watching a different Marchisio :confused:
Absolutely. He's no Camoranesi, but he's an intelligent player who knows how to twist and turn with the ball to his favour. He also has this special number which I've seen him perform three times this season ;):

 

Fred

Senior Member
Oct 2, 2003
41,113
Absolutely. He's no Camoranesi, but he's an intelligent player who knows how to twist and turn with the ball to his favour. He also has this special number which I've seen him perform three times this season ;):

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u-ngtHv4g8A
He's a decent passer, and a player that makes intelligent forward run's. But i wouldn't exactly say he's a good dribbler. He could work on the wing as an emergency backup, but to play him ahead of Marhionni who is a natural winger wouldn't be a good idea if you ask me.
 

v1rtu4l

Senior Member
Mar 4, 2008
6,349
He's a decent passer, and a player that makes intelligent forward run's. But i wouldn't exactly say he's a good dribbler. He could work on the wing as an emergency backup, but to play him ahead of Marhionni who is a natural winger wouldn't be a good idea if you ask me.
yeah, there are these kinds of players that do naturally try to run down the wings when they get the ball and other players that are more comfortable to play in central positions keeping possession by passing and not just running forward ...

marchisio is surely the second type of player, that was easy to see last time he had to play on the right, in the match where marchionni roamed to the left
 

Salvo

J
Moderator
Dec 17, 2007
62,790
ßüякε;1895255 said:
I don't understand 90% of your signature.
:lol: me either.


about marchisio, i think he would do his best work in the middle but im not against trying him on the wing he surely would be better than marchionni
 

Fred

Senior Member
Oct 2, 2003
41,113
No he wouldn't. Marchionni isn't as bad as you guys are making him out to be. surely he has been performing poorly most of the time. But fact of the matter is, he's a natural winger. His link up play with the fullback is good, and he's comfortable on the wing.
 

Sadomin

Senior Member
Apr 5, 2005
7,327
The way Manchester United played in the Champions League last year is my ideal kind of football. I'm bringing them up because we actually have quite similar squads.

They essentially played a formation which easily switched between 4-4-2 and 4-3-3, and what we lack to play like they did is a creative midfielder and better fullbacks.

On paper you had this:

Van der Sar
Brown, Ferdinand, Vidic, Evra
Hargreaves, Scholes, Carrick, Ronaldo
Tevez, Rooney

With Ronaldo and Evra being the more attacking pair, and the opposite side providing width whenever necessary but also able to strengthen the defence and midfield. In attack, this would become pretty much a 4-3-3.

In our team, Marchisio can be our Hargreaves. Giovinco = Ronaldo. Amauri and Del Piero are not worse than Tevez and Rooney in terms of being able to bring the rest into play. (or anything else, really). And like I have said before, Marchisio has everything necessary to be a good right midfielder if he has other players around him who are more attacking.
 

Lucky Luke

Senior Member
Jul 23, 2007
6,218
................Buffon
????...Canna....Chiellini...Criscito/DC
..........Momo....Marchisio
..Camo......Diego...........Gio
...............Amauri
or 4-4-2 with Ale in front

Criscito,Cannavaro,Diego whos next?we need a reliable RB
im praying to GOD to keep Gigi and Trez...i really hope the new coach make the best available choices because im very very dissapointed the last 46 days.
 

Juve_Kosova

★ ★ ★
May 4, 2004
11,622
Buffon

Motta - Cannavaro - Chiellini - Criscito

Sissoko - Zanetti

Camoranesi - Diego - Giovinco

Amauri​


Zanetti / Marchisio
Criscito / Molinaro
Giovinco / Del Piero
Amauri / Iaquinta
Sissoko / Poulsen...

Thats the team i would play..
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 24)