Summer mercato thread 2022-23 season (37 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.

.zero

★ ★ ★
Aug 8, 2006
83,502
It's not about being the 20th or not, he was arguing that we don't know if they were going to get a LB or not.

- - - Updated - - -


That was not what you said a few days ago and the reaction was not about Milik's cost. It was all about the priorities which are obvious to everyone with half a brain that they are fucked up.
Management and coaches know more than half wits on an Internet forum. They are the pros. Fans are the morons who invest time and money into something they will never understand. With the exception of a few experts here of course.
 

IlCapitano

Senior Member
Dec 16, 2012
5,614
They spent time on Milik, not resources. This is what 9riorities mean, the deals you finish before others. They spent an entire summer not addressing the LB situation, it's that obvious.
I never said they should not sign a LB, I just said that Milik did not take any time, resources etc from a LB signing. They had time since Pellegrini left, they still have time now. If they do not sign a LB it means they do not want to or can't, but it's not because of Milik
 

JCK

Biased
JCK
May 11, 2004
125,418
I never said they should not sign a LB, I just said that Milik did not take any time, resources etc from a LB signing. They had time since Pellegrini left, they still have time now. If they do not sign a LB it means they do not want to or can't, but it's not because of Milik
Signing Milik took time that could have been spent on fixing the LB situation. Signing Milik did not take five minutes to complete.
 

Post Ironic

Senior Member
Feb 9, 2013
42,253
Signing Milik took time that could have been spent on fixing the LB situation. Signing Milik did not take five minutes to complete.
It took time, certainly… but they had an entire summer to identify and buy a decent LB. Milik is irrelevant to that imo. They just fucked around and clearly ignored the LB problem. I don’t think it’s about prioritizing, I think it’s entirely about them deciding they won’t spend on a LB with Sandro here.

Maybe our last two results will have them panic and go out and buy one, but until now, their moves clearly show they don’t think buying a LB is a necessity. It’s embarrassing at this point.
 
Last edited:

Robee

Senior Member
Jun 21, 2011
7,195
Signing Milik took time that could have been spent on fixing the LB situation. Signing Milik did not take five minutes to complete.
The time arguement is quite useless. 95% of the work is done by lawyers and agents. There's time to sign 50-60 players in a mercato but not enough resources/financial means/room in the squad.
 
Last edited:

JCK

Biased
JCK
May 11, 2004
125,418
It took time, certainly… but they had an entire summer to identify and buy a decent LB. Milik is irrelevant to that imo. They just fucked around and clearly ignored the LB problem. I don’t think it’s about prioritizing, I think it’s entirely about them deciding they won’t spend on a LB with Sandro here.

Maybe our last two results will have them panic and go out and buy one, but until now, their moves clearly show they don’t think buying a LB is a necessity. It’s embarrassing at this point.
Then seeing that they are doing what they are doing, seeing that they are ignoring the needs and buying a 20th player or so is annoying and the reactions from the fans are justifiable.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 20)