Summer Mercato Thread 2018 (75 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.

s4tch

Senior Member
Mar 23, 2015
33,852
It makes sense if FFP is our concern.

His book value is ~19.2M. If sold for 100M, that is an 80M capital gain. If we're talking about 3 year periods as per FFP, that would cover ~27M annual charge for 3 years, which is the equivalent of an 133MM player on a 5 year contract. Wages would probably be equal or lower.
ffp is not our concern, but sustainability is. i can easily imagine beppe doing that for financial reasons.

allegri would be happy again: he'd find himself in a position when he had to build a team from scratch at the start of the season :weee:
 

Buy on AliExpress.com
Jul 13, 2010
6,792
It makes sense if FFP is our concern.

His book value is ~19.2M. If sold for 100M, that is an 80M capital gain. If we're talking about 3 year periods as per FFP, that would cover ~27M annual charge for 3 years, which is the equivalent of an 133MM player on a 5 year contract. Wages would probably be equal or lower.
I think this mercato increased our financial iq by couple of thousands since we started to calculate things with amortisation, net gains, depreciations and shit like three weeks ago. Unbelievable scenes!
 

italiacalcio10

Senior Member
Mar 3, 2014
3,866
ffp is not our concern, but sustainability is. i can easily imagine beppe doing that for financial reasons.

allegri would be happy again: he'd find himself in a position when he had to build a team from scratch at the start of the season :weee:
Honestly, with sports, it doesn't matter if you have cash flow deficits. If your revenue grows, your valuation will grow (unless its growth from asset sales).

Sports teams are unique in 1 way. It is live content, with an extremely large and loyal fanbase. Over the last 10+ years non-live content has seen a huge change, and most media companies have been under immense pressure. Even Disney, which has 30-40% of its earnings from ESPN was under heavy pressure, but has seen some relieved by the success of the movie studio business.

Fact is: live content is still hard to replace. News is live content, but it is easier to replace than live sports (ie: go on Twitter or or look for online news). But sports? there is a reason that every time a rights contract is negotiated, the annual fee increases by almost 100%. It is irreplaceable.

So for Juventus, if it wants its stock to go up. There is only 2 it must do.
Drive as much top line growth as possible by being a top 3 club globally. Football becomes more global every year, and one day the Champions League may be replaced by a european super league (maybe not now, but in 10 years, maybe). Essentially, it can't be afraid to invest and have cash flow deficits. It must control the debt load as well, and ensure it can always get out of trouble (if say, the team doesn't make champions league one year).

There are 3 ways a team can go bankrupt:
1: Too many wages, without having players with sufficient market value to alleviate this pressure through sales. Ie: don't buy 10 Ronaldo aged players. If you have a bias for youth, you can always sell.
2: Too much debt, to the point where you cannot cover your interest expenses. Well European interest rates are near 0. Sell Sturaro and you can pay your annual interest. lol.
3: Inability to refinance debt. Once again, I doubt that happens. Juventus is a jewel. Exor would inject equity if needed.

Juventus is fine. As long as Juventus is a prominent team in the world, the market value of Juventus will increase.

Obviously there needs to be some discipline, just don't raise 1B in debt. lol
 

Sjaban

Senior Member
Dec 29, 2012
2,064
Pjanic is not indispensable.

The midfield needs an SMS type of player for sure.

One of Miralems key attributes is his exceptional free kick taking skill from 20/25 yds.

This area is now covered by Dybala and CR7.

Lotito will find a cash/player adjustment valued at €105mincluding MP extremely tempting.
Agree that Dybala can take the free kicks, but why mention ronaldo? His conversation rate is 4% from free kicks. Most of the ones he takes are skies into the second ring
 

Juliano13

Senior Member
May 6, 2012
5,017
Agree that Dybala can take the free kicks, but why mention ronaldo? His conversation rate is 4% from free kicks. Most of the ones he takes are skies into the second ring
Just one more piece of evidence what the Ronaldo PR machine has done. Below average fk taker but its not like there aren't millions of retards out there who think he is one of the best at it.
 

maxi

Senior Member
Aug 31, 2006
3,767
I know Pjanic is good but he always gives the impression that he doesnt fit juve.Having said that and considering the financial gains i wouldnt be so upset replacing him with Pogba
Pogba is better. Much quicker on the break. Pjanic has a tendency to slow the game down whenever we're trying to press forward
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 72)