When you have hundreds of people from all different parts of the world of course there is going to be some conflicts over opinions and the ways people present those opinions. I personally have rarely had any trouble presenting my opinions and discussing them around here.
When you have hundreds of people from all different parts of the world of course there is going to be some conflicts over opinions and the ways people present those opinions. I personally have rarely had any trouble presenting my opinions and discussing them around here.
No I know that I’m just the one that’s used as a flogging post and you know it brother. Look at the Sandro post within minutes my faith in Christ was brought up and mocked
No I know that I’m just the one that’s used as a flogging post and you know it brother. Look at the Sandro post within minutes my faith in Christ was brought up and mocked
Like I said before, it's not about you. If you post things that people think ridiculous, they will jump you for it, unless you can back up what you're saying.
Like I said before, it's not about you. If you post things that people think ridiculous, they will jump you for it, unless you can back up what you're saying.
Well I thought I did. I thought explaining that Spinazzola was better tactically defensively and could be as effective going forward. I didn’t see how that didn’t explain my belief. So why then did the mockery continue. I stated an opinion backed it up as to why I believed that way and also said it was primarily for the money of 70 mill or more. How is any of that worth mockery ? All because I’m not on the group think ? I believe for that money you have to think of the sale. No matter who you are. We aren’t real or Barca that are basically government run with the banks manipulating everything for them. We can’t sit on millions of debt and still buy like they do
You can’t compre facts stats etc because one plays on a world power house and the other on a mid table team. That completely effects a players stats and facts. You have to look at the player individually and assess their play, skill and aptitude in the tactics of their position
You can’t compre facts stats etc because one plays on a world power house and the other on a mid table team. That completely effects a players stats and facts. You have to look at the player individually and assess their play, skill and aptitude in the tactics of their position
You didn't compare anything. You said he is better defensively. Now you are saying he is better tactically defensively and could be as effective going forward. You haven't presented a single argument as to why this is the case, and people have asked you many many times. Why is he better defensively? You can't just say he is better and not provide a single shred of evidence. Of course you get ridiculed for that.
You didn't compare anything. You said he is better defensively. Now you are saying he is better tactically defensively and could be as effective going forward. You haven't presented a single argument as to why this is the case, and people have asked you many many times. Why is he better defensively? You can't just say he is better and not provide a single shred of evidence. Of course you get ridiculed for that.
I said those exact words go look back at both posts because I had to repeat myself. I also said he concentrates better in the box tracks back and isn’t as lazy defensively
im not familiar with who he has as a source, but i think not. my fratello has got everything right so far for the time i know him. how many gurus you know with such a record?