Summer Mercato season 2024-25 (51 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.

athas

Senior Member
Jul 15, 2007
576
Thankfully we don't make such silly judgments, right?
Yes. I said base on that match only. I can see why Motta values him. Super versatile, can play CB, DM, CM, AM, hardworking and has good final ball. He can be a glue upfront, runs around to help connect things.

If Motta values versatile and playing for others more than technical, then I guess Koop can be the best player in Serie A in his view.
 

rainhard

Senior Member
May 5, 2004
4,230
We all understand the accounting tricks. But there's other players we could sell if we wanted to. We could have sold Bremer for 70M for instance. Not saying we should though. If we sold Bremer would we just have to accept it because they did it?

At the end of the day, we sold Soule to help fund Douglas Luiz. That's what it really boils down to. In the long run, Luiz will cost us 30M net after the other players went to Aston Villa, so we basically traded three young players away for him.

Would the result be different if we regarded Soule as a better talent than he might be? Probably not, because regardless of who is in charge here, we always up selling or loaning young players. It's just what we do. I wouldn't be surprised if we ended up selling Yildiz next summer too. Interchange his name with Guler and it would be the same result as well. So the morale of the story is, it doesn't matter to many of us what the financing ramifications are. People are sick of this nonsense year after year.

We spent a lot on Douglas Luiz and he better put in consistent, world class performances, otherwise he will cost us huge in the long run.
You already answer your own question, we decided it is better to sell Soule than to sell Bremer, case closed

For Douglas Luiz it is not the case if in the next 2 or 3 years we can sell him for more than 50m or at least 50m we can still coup profits in that way(because the more years we amortized him the more profit we can coup from his transfer value) same as Koopmeiners. If both are proven to become players with 70-80m valuation in 2-3 years then all the loss when we sell Soule will be covered easily. There are no guarantee that Soule can become a top player too, I will take the gamble on Douglas Luiz and Koop in heart beat even if I need to sacrifica Soule

I think with our buying of 26 years old players that already proven plot as our big signings and use the money from Soule to finance it means we are really want to stabilize our stature in and off the pitch simultanously. Those players still have resale value and with our "more attractive" football hopefully we can sell them at least the same amount we buy them and reinvest later
 
Last edited:

Siamak

╭∩╮( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)╭∩╮
Aug 13, 2013
17,037
The reintegration of #McKennie risks fueling some false hope to those who are out of the #Juventus squad, but some substantial differences should be highlighted. In the case of #Chiesa, for example, #Juve has interrupted the negotiations on the renewal because, after the first discussions with #Giuntoli, #ThiagoMotta has rejected him on a technical-tactical level. Whereas #Kostic and #Rugani have long contracts. Therefore, the exclusions are not only due to contractual issues as for the Texan, that has a contract expiring in 2025 and will renew under the conditions proposed by the club. #calciomercato

[Giovanni Albanese]
 

GrandeGigi

Senior Member
Sep 18, 2012
1,792
We are doing the same mistake, 70m for de ligt and he floped,
70m for Vlahovic and still a big question mark for that amount we paid for him
70m for Chiesa and no club has offered a half of it yet
90M for Higuaín and always disappeared in the big games.
koop is overvalued, he worths 50m at maximum.
De Ligt was very young, came off of one excellent season and landed with a huge signing on fee and wages that we would never be able to maintain for his next contract renewal.

Vlahovic came off the back of 1.5 excellent seasons, but was clearly raw and brought in on a high exponential wage.

Chiesa came off the back of a couple of decent seasons as a promising Italian player on a decent salary with large deferred fees.

The Higuain thing is a lie, he delivered in the majority of domestic league and cup games. The only big game for Juventus he was average in to my memory was the Cardiff final, but there were many worse players that day.

Yes Koop is overvalued at 60m, even by current transfer fees, but he’s produced consistently in the league for the past two years, is 26 and by reported figures would be joining on a reasonable wage.

Therefore, there are minimal similarities between these others transfers you mention, other than maybe Higuain where you are expecting end product, high fee, bringing in at the prime and not expecting to recoup a fee at the end, and even then we are bringing in Koop 2 years younger.

Unless of course you deem a ‘mistake’ to simply be paying a large transfer fee, in which case we should fill the squad with mediocrity or prospects at 20 million and continue playing for a 4th place trophy year on year by your logic. (Kind of like Milan’s strategy)
 

juve123

Senior Member
Aug 10, 2017
16,162
Milik stays at Juventus. Kostic has a chance. Nothing changes for Chiesa: unlike McKennie, he is not even offered a renewal at a lower price, Thiago Motta does not consider Chiesa suitable for his playing system and model and does not compromise on the ex-viola player.
(@mirkonicolino)
 

Badass J Elkann

It's time to go!!
Feb 12, 2006
68,092
Crystal Palace are offering €8m to sign Kostić, who is currently out of the project. If he doesn't leave at the end of the transfer window, A reinstatement into the squad cannot be ruled out.

[@GiovaAlbanese)
Just take the money and run

- - - Updated - - -

Milik stays at Juventus. Kostic has a chance. Nothing changes for Chiesa: unlike McKennie, he is not even offered a renewal at a lower price, Thiago Motta does not consider Chiesa suitable for his playing system and model and does not compromise on the ex-viola player.
(@mirkonicolino)
Kinda goes with what I said about sometime ago about Chiesa being an instinctive player and not one that would necessarily have the tactical discipline to fit into a system like Motta's
 

Siamak

╭∩╮( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)╭∩╮
Aug 13, 2013
17,037
De Ligt was very young, came off of one excellent season and landed with a huge signing on fee and wages that we would never be able to maintain for his next contract renewal.

Vlahovic came off the back of 1.5 excellent seasons, but was clearly raw and brought in on a high exponential wage.

Chiesa came off the back of a couple of decent seasons as a promising Italian player on a decent salary with large deferred fees.

The Higuain thing is a lie, he delivered in the majority of domestic league and cup games. The only big game for Juventus he was average in to my memory was the Cardiff final, but there were many worse players that day.

Yes Koop is overvalued at 60m, even by current transfer fees, but he’s produced consistently in the league for the past two years, is 26 and by reported figures would be joining on a reasonable wage.

Therefore, there are minimal similarities between these others transfers you mention, other than maybe Higuain where you are expecting end product, high fee, bringing in at the prime and not expecting to recoup a fee at the end, and even then we are bringing in Koop 2 years younger.

Unless of course you deem a ‘mistake’ to simply be paying a large transfer fee, in which case we should fill the squad with mediocrity or prospects at 20 million and continue playing for a 4th place trophy year on year by your logic. (Kind of like Milan’s strategy)
I don't say they are/were not quality players, the point is we did overpay for them. Higuain was brought here when we won Scudetto 7 times in a row with the most goals scored in each season However, we had a problem scoring goals in the CL , two goals in two finals is proof of that. but scoring statistics actually shows he scored against weak opponents, i think it was just not worth paying 90m for him. Morata did similiar work for much less. 70m was so much for both of De ligt and Chiesa you can't justify it, the injury track records caused them to spent a lot of time out of squad, when you pay 70m for a player you expect him to be available
 

Robee

Senior Member
Jun 21, 2011
6,290
I don't say they are/were not quality players, the point is we did overpay for them. Higuain was brought here when we won Scudetto 7 times in a row with the most goals scored in each season However, we had a problem scoring goals in the CL , two goals in two finals is proof of that. but scoring statistics actually shows he scored against weak opponents, i think it was just not worth paying 90m for him. Morata did similiar work for much less. 70m was so much for both of De ligt and Chiesa you can't justify it, the injury track records caused them to spent a lot of time out of squad, when you pay 70m for a player you expect him to be available
Wait, what? Higuain scored against all the big teams...? Milan, Roma, Inter, Napoli...

Some transfers just don't pan out. Physical, tactical, mental issues, form, luck, etc. Can't expect them all to be spot on and if you want a certain type of players sometimes you just have to splash some cash. If they fail, yes, it hurts more. But there's no building a team of the level we were (and want to be) without spending big once and a while. Whether Koop is the right choice to overspend or not, don't know. We'll see...
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 33)