Summer mercato 2021-22 (88 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Jun 16, 2020
12,435
Why did we sign him up if we did not have the money and also Haaland release clause gets activated next season instead of spending 60 million on Vlahovic
I thought that the clause of Haaland is around ~75m and besides that there will be a big difference between his contract and the one of Vlahovic.

Haaland is twice the player Vlahovic is, but we’ll face competition of every big club in Europe. Even if we accept the financial conditions, it would still be a gamble as other clubs are probably willing to do the same.

If Vlahovic renews this summer, with rumors saying that Fiorentina offered him a 3m contract, we will probably have to make a offer around 70m with Vlahovic asking more then he does now.

So I expect Vlahovic to get more expensive with time, and Haaland a option with not many certainties as everyone in Europe wants him. Big financial differences between the 2, with the risk of paying more for Vlahovic over a year.

The only positive outcome for Vlahovic would be if he doesn’t renew at Fiorentina. Pushing for this transfer would certainly help that.

Btw l think that Fiorentina will accept 50m for Vlahovic.
 

juve123

Senior Member
Aug 10, 2017
16,651
I thought that the clause of Haaland is around ~75m and besides that there will be a big difference between his contract and the one of Vlahovic.

Haaland is twice the player Vlahovic is, but we’ll face competition of every big club in Europe. Even if we accept the financial conditions, it would still be a gamble as other clubs are probably willing to do the same.

If Vlahovic renews this summer, with rumors saying that Fiorentina offered him a 3m contract, we will probably have to make a offer around 70m with Vlahovic asking more then he does now.

So I expect Vlahovic to get more expensive with time, and Haaland a option with not many certainties as everyone in Europe wants him. Big financial differences between the 2, with the risk of paying more for Vlahovic over a year.

The only positive outcome for Vlahovic would be if he doesn’t renew at Fiorentina. Pushing for this transfer would certainly help that.

Btw l think that Fiorentina will accept 50m for Vlahovic.
This is Italy not Germany where clubs bend over to bayern Munich again Vlahovic will cost us between 60-70 million do we invest the money in a new midfielder like SMS or de paul
 

Dostoevsky

Tzu
Administrator
May 27, 2007
89,014
I don’t really care about his wife, and I agree that he is probably entering his prime years, but still I’m sceptical regarding him as he failed in France and is way too one dimensional striker.
He failed in France because he scored 20 goals on 40 matches?

He had injury issues. But there's no way that's a failure.
 

Quetzalcoatl

It ain't hard to tell
Aug 22, 2007
66,773
Pjanic? Primary transfer target? :rofl: Dear god, allegri gone nuts and the season hasn't even started. We're in for a ride this summer
Watch how people will rationalise it if it becomes reality

- - - Updated - - -

Both Luca Gramellini and Agresti are saying the pjanic storyline is more about pjanic wanting a return more so than allegri or Juventus wanting him back

Locatelli is the one
Fingers crossed
 

Post Ironic

Senior Member
Feb 9, 2013
42,253
Finished? He's 28. He has at least 4-5 more good seasons in him. His track record is insane and if he was return to Italy he's a sure banger of 25+ goals in a season. He sure does have a whore wife but who the fuck cares, he'd be here to deliver performances and imo having him with Chiesa and Cuadrado on the side would be insane.

I wouldn't mind gambling on Vlahovic, though. I'm a bit sceptical about him but I'd probably give it a go.
:lol:

Icardi had 7 goals - 3 assists between CL and Ligue 1 this year. Playing with Neymar, Mbappe, Di Maria, etc. Insane. So prolific. We should definitely pay 50mil plus for him and give him 7-10 mil/year net. Would be incredible!:tuttosport:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 74)