This is one of the most retarded posts I have seen in a long time. I've seen every game our NT played since 1998 or something. If people are preferring De Bruyne over Hazard that IS overrating De Bruyne. It's insane to build a team around De Bruyne, when you have Hazard at your disposal.
You're going on my ignore list, because frankly, I have no need for your bullshit.
Lastly, I find it remarkable how you underrate two French speaking players, yet completely overrate a Flemish speaking one. Must be Flemish newspapers getting to you.
Its insane how you can just be so completely stubborn and subjectively wrong, and then drag the language part into this. Extremely funny, considering i dont give a flying fuck about it.
Lets sum up the facts
- Hazard is our most talented player, but for a long time severely performs under his quality at Belgium. I find this mostly a failure of the Coach.
- De Bruyne is less talented then Hazard. But he performed better.
- Nobody would build around De Bruyne and leave out Hazard. We just didnt build around anyone.
- De Bruyne has been on fire in the bundesliga this season, 14 goals and 24 assists in 38 games. Seriously, how is that overrating ?
- Witsel's defensive issues were highlighted in the Argentina game. Might want to look up analysis cause it was pretty obvious. In his defence, De Bruyne was also playing deep in the midfield, and was just as worse, but De Bruyne isnt a deep cm technically (wtf wilmots).
- My preferred central midfield used to be Defour-Witsel-Fellaini. The old Standard axis. Preferring this over using both Simons and Dembele, both dutch.
- Considering Nainggolan is better then Defour, i swapped them.
I'm beeing objective. You are apparently very offended i'm giving criticism at french speaking players. Do explain me what it means that i'm also giving heavy critique over our entire defence, wich is mostly flemish ?
I'll tell you. I care about performance. I dont give a shit about language.