Summer mercato 2015 (77 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Dostoevsky

Tzu
Administrator
May 27, 2007
89,026
its says because of the pogba to barca deal
lol

I think we're gonna sell Pogba, it's just a matter of time. We might keep him for the next season but I can't see him staying here for many years. It's just a matter of time before some club gives an offer we won't refuse.

Having said that, signing Witsel as his replacement would be nothing but pathetic. Seriously.
 

Dostoevsky

Tzu
Administrator
May 27, 2007
89,026
The only way i would be ok with Pogba leaving this summer would be if we get Verratti and Isco with the money from his sale.
Getting Verratti here would be absolutely amazing. Brilliant player.

And yeah, he's probably the only I'd like to have here instead of Pogba.

Seeing Witsel as his replacement makes my eyes cry blood.
 

mondo1

Senior Member
May 14, 2006
11,465
The only way i would be ok with Pogba leaving this summer would be if we get Verratti and Isco with the money from his sale.
even with 100m we will not get them. psg and real dont want to sell and i guess isco and veratti dont want to leave either.
i think we changed enough already this summer with losing 2 starters in pirlo and tevez. would be a pretty bad idea to sell another one. i think we should integrate dybala/mandzukic/khedira first before making more changes.... we also need to think about replacing buffon barzagli evra lichtsteiner and maybe moratta in the next 1-2 years. hopefully we can find a good oppertunity for an AM this summer and than we are set. sell pogba next year and sign 2 good defenders a midfielder and maybe a wc striker if moratta leaves.
 

Osman

Koul Khara!
Aug 30, 2002
61,503
so you would take Isco who hasnt played a single minute at AM last season.

the season he actually played AM he was benched most of the time, now that he plays CM/LM he suddenly gets more playing time. i wonder why

SIMPLE: Because Real play 4-3-3, wide forwards or CMs for attacking midfielders/playmakers available.

Isco is the very definition of AM, little slower central attacking playmaker with brilliant technique (dude just floats by players, seen him live, and its sick how impressive he looks up close), dribbling and good vision who attacks the channels, plays 1-2s easily and has keen eye for the final pass. He is bit too much of a non direct ball hog at times, doesnt realise it quickly, plus inconsistent at times, but can be ironed out with a persistent coach. But he is pretty much as creative central AM/playmaker in the hole as a player can get these days, in a time where these players get pushed to wide positions or lower CM position, as he has been in Reals tactical set up.




Elegant mofo, no way will Real get rid of him, and if they do, expect bidding war with EPL teams.
 

zizinho

Senior Member
Apr 14, 2013
51,816
this year or next year?

- - - Updated - - -

SIMPLE: Because Real play 4-3-3, wide forwards or CMs for attacking midfielders/playmakers available.

Isco is the very definition of AM, little slower central attacking playmaker with brilliant technique (dude just floats by players, seen him live, and its sick how impressive he looks up close), dribbling and good vision who attacks the channels, plays 1-2s easily and has keen eye for the final pass. He is bit too much of a non direct ball hog at times, doesnt realise it quickly, plus inconsistent at times, but can be ironed out with a persistent coach. But he is pretty much as creative central AM/playmaker in the hole as a player can get these days, in a time where these players get pushed to wide positions or lower CM position, as he has been in Reals tactical set up.




Elegant mofo, no way will Real get rid of him, and if they do, expect bidding war with EPL teams.
yeah im not denying he is a great player. i simply said Arda is better and would suit this team better. now people said they would take Arda because he isnt an true AM, despite the fact that he can play there, but would still take Isco who didnt play AM at all last season. thats the only reason i brought that up.

and there is no way Isco is available, while Arda indeed is, for a good price too (40M)
 

da_ledgeaun

The Juve Freak
Jun 2, 2007
6,611
SIMPLE: Because Real play 4-3-3, wide forwards or CMs for attacking midfielders/playmakers available.

Isco is the very definition of AM, little slower central attacking playmaker with brilliant technique (dude just floats by players, seen him live, and its sick how impressive he looks up close), dribbling and good vision who attacks the channels, plays 1-2s easily and has keen eye for the final pass. He is bit too much of a non direct ball hog at times, doesnt realise it quickly, plus inconsistent at times, but can be ironed out with a persistent coach. But he is pretty much as creative central AM/playmaker in the hole as a player can get these days, in a time where these players get pushed to wide positions or lower CM position, as he has been in Reals tactical set up.




Elegant mofo, no way will Real get rid of him, and if they do, expect bidding war with EPL teams.
we got Morata to convince him if there is a bidding war!!

Man,Isco behind Morata and Mandzu!!!! Faptastic
 

GarfielD

Senior Member
May 21, 2009
13,424
even with 100m we will not get them. psg and real dont want to sell and i guess isco and veratti dont want to leave either.
i think we changed enough already this summer with losing 2 starters in pirlo and tevez. would be a pretty bad idea to sell another one. i think we should integrate dybala/mandzukic/khedira first before making more changes.... we also need to think about replacing buffon barzagli evra lichtsteiner and maybe moratta in the next 1-2 years. hopefully we can find a good oppertunity for an AM this summer and than we are set. sell pogba next year and sign 2 good defenders a midfielder and maybe a wc striker if moratta leaves.
I agree that we shouldnt sell Pogba, i was talking about a scenario if that happens.

I dont agree that Isco and Verrati wont like to come here, especially Verrati. The money will be a problem though, i agree that 100m would not be enough for both.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 73)