That list is neverending because you mention Baggio like 10 times.
Baggio who Moggi had no hand in buying.
Actually, Kohler, Dino Baggio, Conte, Del Piero, Peruzzi Moggi had NO hand in buying. Because they were all signed before 94, when Moggi came. Actually Ferrara and Deschamps came around 94, so not sure if they were done deals already when he came, or he signed them (Likely he signed Ferrara because he was boss in Napoli while Ferrara was there).
And you are just namedropping btw, without considering wether or not they are good deals at all. I liked Di Vaio, but how was he a good deal? Way overpriced and was decent, but not good enough. You have hardly analysed several of those deals.
And Moggi was good in deals, but you know the list of flops is pretty much aslong as the one you mentionned? You have to acknowledge the mistakes with the great stuff, if you want to make a clear picture.
Baggio who Moggi had no hand in buying.
Actually, Kohler, Dino Baggio, Conte, Del Piero, Peruzzi Moggi had NO hand in buying. Because they were all signed before 94, when Moggi came. Actually Ferrara and Deschamps came around 94, so not sure if they were done deals already when he came, or he signed them (Likely he signed Ferrara because he was boss in Napoli while Ferrara was there).
And you are just namedropping btw, without considering wether or not they are good deals at all. I liked Di Vaio, but how was he a good deal? Way overpriced and was decent, but not good enough. You have hardly analysed several of those deals.
And Moggi was good in deals, but you know the list of flops is pretty much aslong as the one you mentionned? You have to acknowledge the mistakes with the great stuff, if you want to make a clear picture.
We payed 33m eur for the 29, soon to be 30, right back Thuram.
Now, no doubt that Thuram was a great player but if this board has so much money then they'll also buy great players.
Dunno why Thuram's transfer is so special and why should Moggi be credited for this transfer.
