Simone Zaza (12 Viewers)
- Thread starter Salvatore
- Start date
Llorente is not sold yet, and right now we have 4 players ( Morata - Mandzukic - Llorente- Zaza ) who play the same position and in the best case scenario, only one of them should be playing.
Can't see the logic behind spending 35+ mil for two backup
when we should be looking for an AM.
Can't see the logic behind spending 35+ mil for two backup
when we should be looking for an AM.
U want to tell me matri, anelka, vucinic and quagliarella were all the same type of players?
Llorente will be sold.
So we are left with morata, mandzukic, zaza. Those are the only cfs we will have. If we dont get a #10 i bet both morata and mandzukic will start so u want to tell me we will have too many players?
?
Even if Llorente it leaves us with 3 players who cost us roughly 60 mil for one position, and could've been in the market for an AM or winger if we didn't spent a combined 39 mil for Mandzukic and freaking Zaza ?
What would you prefer we spent that 35mil for a class AM and have Llorente as a backup for Morata or have Pereyra or Vidal start as AM ?
What would you prefer we spent that 35mil for a class AM and have Llorente as a backup for Morata or have Pereyra or Vidal start as AM ?
source?
I don't think that we have a fixed buyback option at all otherwise it would be made official. probably first refusal.
if he has another good season why should sass sell him for peanuts, they are no charity club and would demand at least 30 mil IMO, no matter how good our relations are
@zaza deal: don't like it, 18 mil and 2,2 net wages if i remember correctly, that's a mayor transfer for fifth? choice striker, when we could have let him stay at sass with a tidy 6,5 mil profit on a player who never wore the juve jersey...
hope he proves me wrong like Pereyra who justified his price tag in the end.
I don't think that we have a fixed buyback option at all otherwise it would be made official. probably first refusal.
if he has another good season why should sass sell him for peanuts, they are no charity club and would demand at least 30 mil IMO, no matter how good our relations are
@zaza deal: don't like it, 18 mil and 2,2 net wages if i remember correctly, that's a mayor transfer for fifth? choice striker, when we could have let him stay at sass with a tidy 6,5 mil profit on a player who never wore the juve jersey...
hope he proves me wrong like Pereyra who justified his price tag in the end.
God, this is like clockwork. Absolutely more precise than a Swiss watch.
And the same players that get lambasted in July are lauded in May. Again.
And the same posters will suddenly disappear. Again.
But hey. A lot of these posters weren't around in 2002 when Juve signed Di Vaio for 7 million , and then redeemed him the following year for 14. Even though they already had Del Piero, Trezeguet, and Zalayeta on the club.
Cheese, come on brotha.
We will have the best attack in Italy, easily. Depth everyone else is going to envy.
MAYBE we aren't in the market because we haven't found an AM that is either affordable or available? If you were in charge of the club you'd overpay for an AM and have 1 striker to play 3 competitions. Do you not see the weakness in your argument?
We will have the best attack in Italy, easily. Depth everyone else is going to envy.
MAYBE we aren't in the market because we haven't found an AM that is either affordable or available? If you were in charge of the club you'd overpay for an AM and have 1 striker to play 3 competitions. Do you not see the weakness in your argument?