Sorry I did agree with you that charity are better now then in like the 80's or 90's
and you are right about we can't just go kill people because we have too much people.
But we (humans) do that to animals
by saying we should just kill some spieces of animals because it only cost us money.
Thatwas my actually point.
sorry but my english failure isn't helping in this case.
and you are right about we can't just go kill people because we have too much people.
But we (humans) do that to animals
by saying we should just kill some spieces of animals because it only cost us money.
Thatwas my actually point.
sorry but my english failure isn't helping in this case.

We don't need to kill Panda's, or Tigers or Rhinos just because it costs us money to save them. My point with Panda's is that they are failing because of things that have nothing to do with us, it must be the most depressing job in the world trying to save panda's because they literally block you at every hurdle. I would rather the money that gets donated to saving pandas by organisations like WWF be diverted to a cause where it will make an impact and let localised organisations deal with the panda, or the chinese gvt as the chinese love them so much.
Even if their demise was due to deforestation in Szechuan - I don't see how that is our fault, sat on the otherside of the world.
