should liverpool be allowed into next seasons Champions league (6 Viewers)

Dec 26, 2004
10,656
#61
++ [ originally posted by jaecole ] ++


You could also as easily argue that the Champions League shows a teams true quality. When every game matters. Rather than a dragged out league campaign in which you can suffer for many many reasons. Comparing Udinese to Liverpool is a little off. Udinese suck and couldn't do anything in such a competition. Much like every other Italian team excluding Milan and Juve. The difference with smaller English teams is although they might suck, they will work their ass off for it. Like Leeds and Liverpool have shown us.
If Grecee can win the European Championship, nothing will prevent Udinese from wining the CL if only they had Liverpool's luck and fitness and Grecee player's discipline and boring deffensive 6-4-0 tactic...
 

Buy on AliExpress.com

Bjerknes

"Top Economist"
Mar 16, 2004
116,229
#62
++ [ originally posted by jaecole ] ++


That is what it stated on the website. A mistake perhaps, but nonetheless according to the BBC atleast, thats how it was.
But if that were true we wouldn't have to discuss this topic because Liverpool would already be in. CL winners do not get free entry into next year's competition.
 

Bjerknes

"Top Economist"
Mar 16, 2004
116,229
#63
++ [ originally posted by jaecole ] ++


You could also as easily argue that the Champions League shows a teams true quality. When every game matters. Rather than a dragged out league campaign in which you can suffer for many many reasons. Comparing Udinese to Liverpool is a little off. Udinese suck and couldn't do anything in such a competition. Much like every other Italian team excluding Milan and Juve. The difference with smaller English teams is although they might suck, they will work their ass off for it. Like Leeds and Liverpool have shown us.
Erm, don't forget about Inter Jae.

And Udinese is very good side with a very good coach. But an even better fit for the Champions League would be Sampdoria. Novellino is a brilliant tactician and they have one of the best defensive records in Serie A this year. If any team other than the big three in Italy could progress past the second round, I could actually see Sampdoria progressing through as well. Of course the group stage draw would have to be kind to them, sort of like Liverpool's this year. ;)
 

jaecole

Senior Member
Apr 7, 2005
3,017
#64
++ [ originally posted by Andy ] ++


Erm, don't forget about Inter Jae.

And Udinese is very good side with a very good coach. But an even better fit for the Champions League would be Sampdoria. Novellino is a brilliant tactician and they have one of the best defensive records in Serie A this year. If any team other than the big three in Italy could progress past the second round, I could actually see Sampdoria progressing through as well. Of course the group stage draw would have to be kind to them, sort of like Liverpool's this year. ;)
I don't doubt those teams quality, but I don't think they can compete at the top level of Europe. Those teams may be better than the English counterparts but I've never seen Italian teams put in that much workrate. Mostly down to the style of their game of course but it is an advantage on a European stage.

I didn't forget Inter.
 

jaecole

Senior Member
Apr 7, 2005
3,017
#65
++ [ originally posted by Andy ] ++


But if that were true we wouldn't have to discuss this topic because Liverpool would already be in. CL winners do not get free entry into next year's competition.
I'm not telling you it's true. I'm telling you that is what was stated on the offical UEFA website. Their mistake perhaps, but even so. We'll see what happens.
 

swag

L'autista
Administrator
Sep 23, 2003
84,788
#66
++ [ originally posted by baggio ] ++
Personally, i feel Liverpool deserve the right to defend their title. Its hard to imagine the tournament kicking off without a title holder.
I can imagine just about every professional and collegiate sports tournament known to humanity, save for maybe the World Cup...
 

Bjerknes

"Top Economist"
Mar 16, 2004
116,229
#67
++ [ originally posted by jaecole ] ++


I don't doubt those teams quality, but I don't think they can compete at the top level of Europe. Those teams may be better than the English counterparts but I've never seen Italian teams put in that much workrate. Mostly down to the style of their game of course but it is an advantage on a European stage.

I didn't forget Inter.
Well I don't think a team like Everton will be able to compete at the top levels of Europe either, even though their work rate is indeed high. Another aspect of football that can take teams further than expected is their tactics, just like Liverpool. Sampdoria plays a solid defensive game that shuts down the center of the pitch and strikes hard on the counter. Just the way they play could cause some teams some unexpected trouble. Extra workrate is indeed something good to have, however it's not everything. Personally I would favor the tactical part of the game, but that's just me.
 

swag

L'autista
Administrator
Sep 23, 2003
84,788
#68
++ [ originally posted by jaecole ] ++
You could also as easily argue that the Champions League shows a teams true quality. When every game matters. Rather than a dragged out league campaign in which you can suffer for many many reasons.
But it's also a construct where one or two bad referee calls can easily mean the difference between not making it through the elimination rounds and winning the cup.

There's a reason why baseball's World Series is up to 7 games, for example. Imperfect, but it's a far fairer alternative than just two games - under the guise of "every game matters". Or even worse, in the case of the CL Final, just one game.

You can't sleaze your way to the top of the EPL table with a series of bad ref calls, escaping unfortunate injuries and disqualifications, etc., over 38 games.

Udinese suck and couldn't do anything in such a competition.
I'd take Udinese over Liverpool in a two-game match anyday, though. ;)
 

swag

L'autista
Administrator
Sep 23, 2003
84,788
#69
++ [ originally posted by Dan ] ++
I think they should definetly re-introduce the 2nd group stage. That really filtered out the less able teams.
You know, I agree with you, Dan. I feel it filtered out more of the luck, etc., than going to the elimination rounds right away ... eventhough all the clubs are for the rest period of fewer matches.

Simple probabilities. If you flip a coin and 8 times out of 10 it will come up heads, tails has greater chances of coming up the overall winner out of two tosses when compared to four.
 

gray

Senior Member
Moderator
Apr 22, 2003
30,260
#70
++ [ originally posted by swag ] ++
Simple probabilities. If you flip a coin and 8 times out of 10 it will come up heads, tails has greater chances of coming up the overall winner out of two tosses when compared to four.
Rubbish! :D
 

loyada

Senior Member
Feb 6, 2005
1,532
#71
A few seasons ago Real Madrid won the CL but finished 5th and which point the Spanish FA promptly threw Zaragoza, the 4th place team, into the UEFA cup and Real Madrid in CL.

How did this affect Zaragoza? They lost out on large sums of revenue through not being in the Champions League which I'm sure must have hurt.

So I think UEFA will not change the rule as then. Spanish FA made a painful decision to chose between Real Madrid (the CL champions) and Zaragoza (the 4th place team).

So the FA should stop the nonsense and make a decision like Spanish FA.
it would be unfair to the spanish if UEFA change the rule
 

Azzurri7

Pinturicchio
Moderator
Dec 16, 2003
72,692
#72
++ [ originally posted by Dan ] ++
Liverpool should not be allowed in the CL next season.

Sorry, but if you cant hack it in your own domestic league and make the fourth place, you do not deserve to be there next season. Plus, picture how ****ing unfair and harsh it would be to little everton to have their champions league dream cut down because it happened to be a season where another english team which was too rubbish to beat them in their own domestic league takes their difficultly earned spot.

The rules were created in this instance, to stop teams from just only focusing on the CL once safety has been reached in their own domestic leagues. 'Pool fans should be satisfied anyway that they actually won it- hell, If juventus won it I know I wouldnt care.
Well Said D.
 

Dr-Juve

Senior Member
Mar 11, 2004
1,833
#74
++ [ originally posted by Dan ] ++
Liverpool should not be allowed in the CL next season.

Sorry, but if you cant hack it in your own domestic league and make the fourth place, you do not deserve to be there next season. Plus, picture how ****ing unfair and harsh it would be to little everton to have their champions league dream cut down because it happened to be a season where another english team which was too rubbish to beat them in their own domestic league takes their difficultly earned spot.

The rules were created in this instance, to stop teams from just only focusing on the CL once safety has been reached in their own domestic leagues. 'Pool fans should be satisfied anyway that they actually won it- hell, If juventus won it I know I wouldnt care.
:thumb:
 
Feb 26, 2005
591
#75
My hometown team, Bendel Insurance, once went wild on the contintent. They brought home the bacon: The West African Football Union (WAFU) Cup. The first time a Nigerian club had done so in 20 odd years. The downside was that their league form suffered. Badly. They slid all the way to the bottom of the table and were set for relegation. The Nigerian FA then made a stunning decision: No team would be relegated that season. Bendel Insurance was saved and has never plumbed such depths since then.
 
Feb 26, 2005
591
#76
However, Everton and Liverpool are big rivals in the same city. The last time the FA subbed one city rival for another it caused hatred that's lasted to this day. I'm talking about Arsenal and Spurs. But that decision was a little easier cos Arsenal had an influential chairman, and we'd shown loyalty to the then Football League from the day it was born. Unlike some people:D
 

Chxta

Onye kwe, Chi ya ekwe
Nov 1, 2004
12,088
#77
The rules were stated from the onset, so I don't see what all the fuss is about Pool not being there next season.
 

Chxta

Onye kwe, Chi ya ekwe
Nov 1, 2004
12,088
#78
Look at it this way...

The World Cup qualifying tournament is seen as a part of the World Cup (FIFA borrowing UEFA's policy as regards the European Championship), which is why the champions have to qualify...
Using that logic, last season's league competition should also be the qualifying tournament for this season's Champion's League...

So Pool should go back and try to qualify through the laid down route!
 

Débora_BR

Junior Member
Apr 9, 2004
377
#79
++ [ originally posted by chxta ] ++
Look at it this way...

The World Cup qualifying tournament is seen as a part of the World Cup (FIFA borrowing UEFA's policy as regards the European Championship), which is why the champions have to qualify...
No, Its different. FIFA changed their rules because of the TVS. Imagine how much Comenbol (South American version of UEFA) would lost if Brazil dindt play in the qualifying.

Its about money... :fero:
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 6)