just finished reading the entire thread. great stuff going on 
rinaudo: loan move for depth. mediocre player who was never used because we always had CBs available. 600k loan fee
traore: at the time kinda promising LB for depth in a postion we weren´t covered. 500k loan fee
motta: young italian. once very promising italy u21 captain. gamble which failed horribly
. 4,75m fee iirc
anreolli: ??
pazienza: vital part in napoli´s 3rd place team while we finished 7th. signed for depth. wasn´t needed because our CM´s never got injured and giaccherini did very well. 0€
padoin: kinda stroke me as a conte signing tbh. hard worker and versatile. average squad player. imo too expensive: 5m fee
bendtner: just a big guy. something we didn´t have up front till now. free loan
boriello: nothing great but still conte played him ahead of quag and matri pretty much every single time ^^. marotta´s fault i guess. 500k loan fee
so let´s see... opinions differ but that doesn´t look horrible to me. martinez was horrible (although his heavy injury certainly didn´t help) but most of those signings were made for depth or relatively cheap gambles. better to have those guys in your squad than playing storari as CB when some injuries and suspensions get together...
another thing i don´t get: where is that "vidal agreed to join bayern" coming from? just because bild reported something and hoeness was pissed after we got him? i watched an interview with heynkes CLEARLY stating that there was NO agreement and no promise whatsoever. heynkes asked vidal if he would follow him to bayern and vidal was willing to take the next step. so bayern obviously was an option but nothing more... one of marotta´s greatest deals so far. absolute beast... it´s ridiculous to say that "everybody could have closed that deal". haters gonna hate
sacking marotta now would be ridiculous and stupid beyond believe. his problem this mercata was that he started out great and finished on a low. it seems that people already forgot about the great signings at the beginning at the transfer window...
obviously i´m very disappointed about not getting a top striker but it really looks like marotta couldn´t do much about it.
look at the names we got linked to:
higuain: not for sale according to mourinho
van persie: ~30m fee despite being on the last year of his contract. now earning as much as buffon, pirlo, vidal and marchisio combined
suarez: no bad boys
dzeko: not for sale. unfortunately city didn´t buy another striker
cavani: if anything only available for CRAZY money
llorente: willing to join. move denied by crazy president.
jovetic: 30m bid (gentlemens agreement) rejected. not sure if that´s believable...
so what should marotta have done? tbh imo it´s better to not buy a striker than to spend 10-15m on someone like pazzini or giroud. so whom would you have bought? and please spare me the "if he had offerd xxm for xyz earlier we would have gotten him. he was ours to lose". i really can´t hear it anymore. wild speculations, nothing more.
again: i´m as disappointed as anyone else because we missed out on the top striker but apart from that marotta did great. we needed all those players for depth (lol at people not wanting isla). one could argue that he didn´t do well on the selling front (and i kinda agree) but tbh i have no idea how to sell players like iaquinta and martinez ^^
//edit:
- great post red
- yes, marotta should really stop talking about top players... or stop talking to the media at all
What's the stroy behind Rinaudo, Traore, Motta, Andreolli, Pacienza, Padoin, Bendtner,Borriello......................
traore: at the time kinda promising LB for depth in a postion we weren´t covered. 500k loan fee
motta: young italian. once very promising italy u21 captain. gamble which failed horribly
anreolli: ??
pazienza: vital part in napoli´s 3rd place team while we finished 7th. signed for depth. wasn´t needed because our CM´s never got injured and giaccherini did very well. 0€
padoin: kinda stroke me as a conte signing tbh. hard worker and versatile. average squad player. imo too expensive: 5m fee
bendtner: just a big guy. something we didn´t have up front till now. free loan
boriello: nothing great but still conte played him ahead of quag and matri pretty much every single time ^^. marotta´s fault i guess. 500k loan fee
so let´s see... opinions differ but that doesn´t look horrible to me. martinez was horrible (although his heavy injury certainly didn´t help) but most of those signings were made for depth or relatively cheap gambles. better to have those guys in your squad than playing storari as CB when some injuries and suspensions get together...
another thing i don´t get: where is that "vidal agreed to join bayern" coming from? just because bild reported something and hoeness was pissed after we got him? i watched an interview with heynkes CLEARLY stating that there was NO agreement and no promise whatsoever. heynkes asked vidal if he would follow him to bayern and vidal was willing to take the next step. so bayern obviously was an option but nothing more... one of marotta´s greatest deals so far. absolute beast... it´s ridiculous to say that "everybody could have closed that deal". haters gonna hate
sacking marotta now would be ridiculous and stupid beyond believe. his problem this mercata was that he started out great and finished on a low. it seems that people already forgot about the great signings at the beginning at the transfer window...
obviously i´m very disappointed about not getting a top striker but it really looks like marotta couldn´t do much about it.
look at the names we got linked to:
higuain: not for sale according to mourinho
van persie: ~30m fee despite being on the last year of his contract. now earning as much as buffon, pirlo, vidal and marchisio combined
suarez: no bad boys
dzeko: not for sale. unfortunately city didn´t buy another striker
cavani: if anything only available for CRAZY money
llorente: willing to join. move denied by crazy president.
jovetic: 30m bid (gentlemens agreement) rejected. not sure if that´s believable...
so what should marotta have done? tbh imo it´s better to not buy a striker than to spend 10-15m on someone like pazzini or giroud. so whom would you have bought? and please spare me the "if he had offerd xxm for xyz earlier we would have gotten him. he was ours to lose". i really can´t hear it anymore. wild speculations, nothing more.
again: i´m as disappointed as anyone else because we missed out on the top striker but apart from that marotta did great. we needed all those players for depth (lol at people not wanting isla). one could argue that he didn´t do well on the selling front (and i kinda agree) but tbh i have no idea how to sell players like iaquinta and martinez ^^
//edit:
- great post red
- yes, marotta should really stop talking about top players... or stop talking to the media at all
